Ultimate tensile strength of loblolly pine strands using stochastic finite element method
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to predict the failure strength of different orientation of wood strands from different growth ring positions under tension loading. Stochastic models were constructed to account for the uncertainty of material properties. The Tsai–Hill criteria were used to predict the ultimate tensile strength (UTS). The UTS results from experimental testing were used to validate the results from models. The difference of UTS between experimental and SFEM ranged from 0.09 to 11.09%. Different stress distributions were found for different orientation strand models, whereas uniform stress distribution was found for homogeneous models. The magnitude of the stress distribution was greater for strands from the growth ring number 11–20. Sensitivity analysis showed that grain orientation and growth ring number influenced the UTS of strands. UTS of strands from growth ring number 1–10 showed strength indexes (Xt, Yt, and S) as dominant factor, whereas UTS of strands from growth ring number 11–20 showed both strength indexes and stress components (σ1, σ2, and τ12) as dominant factors.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Tree Root and Stability Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Larson PR, Kretschmann DE, Clark A III, Isebrands JG (2001) In: Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-129. USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI
2. Bendtsen BA (1978) Forest Prod J 28(10):61
3. Cave ID, Walker JCF (1994) Forest Prod J 44(5):43
4. Panshin AJ, Zeeuw CD (1980) Textbook of wood technology. McGraw Hill, New York
5. Smith RW, Briggs DG (1986) In: Proceedings of cooperative technical workshop. Forest Products Research Society, Madison, WI, pp 1–11
6. Jeong GY, Zink-Sharp A, Hindman DP (2009) Wood Fiber Sci J 41(1):51
7. Jeong GJ (2008) Tensile properties of loblolly pine strands using digital image correlation and stochastic finite element method. Jeong, Blacksburg, VA
8. Kasal B, Leichti RJ (2005) Prog Struct Eng Mater 7(1):310.1002/pse.185 ↗
9. Chakraborty S, Dey SS (2000) Shock Vibration 7(5):30910.1155/2000/730364 ↗
10. Chung DB, Gutiérrez MA, Borst RD (2005) Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(12–16):142710.1016/j.cma.2004.03.021 ↗
11. Clouston P, Lam F (2002) Compos Sci Technol 62:138110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00086-6 ↗
12. Eiermann M, Ernst OG, Ullmann E (2005) In: Proceedings of conference on scientific computing (Algoritmy 2005), 13–18 March 2005, Vysoke Tatry, Podbanske, pp 1–10
13. Ghanem RG, Spans PD (1991) Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach. Springer-Verlag, Berlin10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6 ↗
14. Ghanem RG (1999) ASME J Heat Transfer 121:29010.1115/1.2825979 ↗
15. Kaminski M (2002) Eng Comput 19(7):85410.1108/02644400210444348 ↗
16. Kleiber M, Hien T (1992) The stochastic finite element method basic perturbation technique and computer implementation. Wiley, New York
17. Wang YT, Lam F (1998) J Comput Mater Sci 11:15710.1016/S0927-0256(97)00214-0 ↗
18. Clouston P (2007) Holzforschung 61:39410.1515/HF.2007.052 ↗