Model and analysis of size-stiffening in nanoporous cellular solids
Source abstract
Abstract
The size of the struts in nanoporous cellular solids typically has a secondary influence on the stiffness of the solids, but it leads to significant stiffening when it is on the same order as the higher-order material parameter. We examined this size-dependence using the higher-order finite-element method (FEM) in this study. Mathematical analysis showed that the displacement field that satisfies the conventional Lame equation can serve as a displacement field template in higher-order FEM. Benchmarking studies showed that results from simulations of beam bending and rod torsion using this FEM approach were in good agreement with results from analytical solutions and experiments. Using this approach, we showed that the stiffness of cellular solids is strongly affected by the cellular arrangement and the density when the cell size is on the order of the higher-order material parameter and that the stiffening behavior in nanoporous polyimide can be explained using higher-order theory. The FEM results also showed that a porous solid with half the weight can be engineered to become as stiff as a fully dense solid if the porous microarchitecture is tailored to take advantage of higher-order stiffening.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Cellular and Composite Structures · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Ashby MF (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston
2. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1982) Proc R Soc Lond 382:4310.1098/rspa.1982.0088 ↗
3. Andrews EW, Gioux G, Onck P, Gibson LJ (2001) Int J Mech Sci 43:70110.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-6 ↗
4. Han SH, Do JS, Kader MA, Lee JH, Lee MH, Nah CW (2004) Polym Adv Technol 15:37010.1002/pat.477 ↗
5. Takeichi T, Zuo M, Ito A (1999) High Perform Polym 11:110.1088/0954-0083/11/1/001 ↗
6. Tekoglu C, Onck PR (2005) J Mater Sci 40:5911. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-5042-510.1007/s10853-005-5042-5 ↗
7. Lam DCC, Chong ACM, Yang F, Wang J, Tong P (2003) J Mech Phys Solids 51:147710.1016/S0022-5096(03)00053-X ↗
8. McFarland AW, Colton JS (2005) J Micromech Microeng 15:106010.1088/0960-1317/15/5/024 ↗
9. Fleck NA, Muller GM, Ashby MF, Hutchinson JW (1994) Acta Metall Mater 42:47510.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-9 ↗
10. Lam DCC, Chong ACM (1999) J Mater Res 14:378410.1557/JMR.1999.0512 ↗
11. Ma O, Clarke DR (1995) J Mater Res 10:85310.1557/JMR.1995.0853 ↗
12. Nix WD (1989) Metall Trans A 20:221710.1007/BF02666659 ↗
13. Poole WJ, Ashby MF, Fleck NA (1996) Scr Mater 34:55910.1016/1359-6462(95)00524-2 ↗
14. Stolken JS, Evans AG (1998) Acta Metall Mater 46:510910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00153-0 ↗
15. Ashby MF (1970) Philos Mag 21:39910.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
16. Chong ACM, Yang F, Lam DCC, Tong P (2001) J Mater Res 14:105210.1557/JMR.2001.0146 ↗
17. Lam DCC, Keung LH, Tong P (2008) J Mater Sci Eng A (submitted)
18. Cermal EA (1976) Continuum physics. Academic Press, New York
19. Fleck NA, Hutchinson JW (1993) J Mech Phys Solids 41:182510.1016/0022-5096(93)90072-N ↗
20. Fleck NA, Hutchinson JW (1997) Adv Appl Mech 33:29510.1016/S0065-2156(08)70388-0 ↗
21. Toupin RA (1962) Arch Ration Mech Anal 11:38510.1007/BF00253945 ↗
22. Koiter WT (1964) Proc K Ned Akad Wet (B) 67:17
23. Mindlin RD (1964) Arch Ration Mech Anal 16:5110.1007/BF00248490 ↗
24. Mindlin RD (1965) Int J Solids Struct 1:41710.1016/0020-7683(65)90006-5 ↗
25. Yang F, Chong ACM, Lam DCC, Tong P (2002) Int J Solids Struct 39:273110.1016/S0020-7683(02)00152-X ↗