journal article·2009-08

Resin hardness and interlaminar shear strength of a glass-fibre/vinylester composite cured with high intensity ultraviolet (UV) light

A. Di Pietro, Paul Compston

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Experimental results on properties achieved for bulk vinylester resin and a glass-fibre/vinylester composite cured through exposure to high intensity UV light, was reported. An epoxy vinylester resin was formulated ratio by weight of phosphine oxide-based photoinitiator. The bulk resin was poured into a 10 mm diameter cylindrical mould to a depth of 8 mm. The mould was placed under a high-intensity UV spotlight. The diameter of the aperture at the tip of the guide was 1 mm and the distance from the tip to the surface of the resin was 20 mm. Rockwell hardness testing for polymers was conducted according to ASTM D 785-89. A composite laminate for interlaminar shear testing was made by hand lay-up unidirectional E-glass fibres. Test samples were cut from the laminate using a watercooled diamond saw. The shear strength result and the observed fracture behavior support a conclusion that a high degree of cure and mechanical performance can be attained with high intensity UV curing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Photopolymerization techniques and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Endruweit A, Johnson MS, Long AC (2006) Polym Compos 27:11910.1002/pc.20166 ↗
2. Studer K, Decker C, Beck E, Schwalm R (2003) Prog Org Coat 48:9210.1016/S0300-9440(03)00120-6 ↗
3. Compston P, Schiemer J, Cvetanovska A (2008) Compos Struct 86:2210.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.012 ↗
4. Bannister M (2001) Compos Part A 32:90110.1016/S1359-835X(01)00008-2 ↗
5. Li G, Ghebreyesus A (2006) Compos Struct 72:10510.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.020 ↗
6. Britnell DJ, Tucker N, Smith GF, Wong SSF (2003) J Mater Process Technol 138:31110.1016/S0924-0136(03)00091-8 ↗
7. Compston P, Dexter D (2008) J Mater Sci 43:5017. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2701-310.1007/s10853-008-2701-3 ↗
8. Crivello JV, Narayan R, Sternstein SS (1997) J App Polym Sci 64:207310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970613)64:11<2073::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
9. Cvetanovska A, Compston P (2004) J Mater Sci 39:1791. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000016186.59458.a110.1023/B:JMSC.0000016186.59458.a1 ↗
10. Compston P, Jar P-YB, Burchill PJ, Takahashi K (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61:32110.1016/S0266-3538(00)00226-8 ↗
11. Freidrich K, Walter R, Carlsson LA, Smiley AJ, Gillespie JW (1989) J Mater Sci 24:3387. doi: 10.1007/BF0113907010.1007/BF01139070 ↗
12. Di Pietro A, Compston P, Gresham R, Hovland G (2008) In: Subic A et al (eds) Meeting the challenges to sustainable mobility. RMIT University Publishing (ISBN 9781921426155), Victoria, Australia