Analysis of scratch-induced damages in multi-layer packaging film systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Scratch-induced damages on multi-layer polymeric packaging films are investigated using laser confocal microscopy. Films were tested using a modified version of the standardized linearly increasing load scratch test (ASTM D7027-05/ISO 19252:2008), which has been successfully demonstrated to correlate field data of commercial films with lab data. Scratch test results show clear distinction between the two model film systems on both the interior and exterior surfaces. Microscopy was performed to investigate the feasibility of utilizing this methodology as a tool for packaging film structure evaluation by determining the effect each layer has on the resistance of scratch damages. It is shown that the film exhibiting superior scratch performance also possesses significantly better stress distribution through its layers during the scratch test, as well as better layer adhesion during severe deformation. The scratch test is capable of discerning film mechanical integrity in a layer-by-layer fashion.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Chu J, Xiang C, Sue HJ, Hollis RD (2000) Polym Eng Sci 40(4):944. doi: 10.1002/pen.1122210.1002/pen.11222 ↗
2. Liang YN, Li SZ, Li DF, Li S (1996) Wear 199(1):66. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(96)07218-310.1016/0043-1648(96)07218-3 ↗
3. Vingsbo O, Hogmark S (1984) Wear 100(1–3):489. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(84)90028-010.1016/0043-1648(84)90028-0 ↗
4. Wong M, Lim G, Moyse A, Reddy J, Sue H-J (2004) Wear 256(11–12):1214. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2003.10.02710.1016/j.wear.2003.10.027 ↗
5. Wong M, Moyse A, Lee F, Sue HJ (2004) J Mater Sci 39(10):3293. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026930.12462.3d10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026930.12462.3d ↗
6. Xiang C, Sue HJ, Chu J, Coleman B (2001) J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 39(1):47. doi: 10.1002/1099-0488(20010101)39:1<47:aid-polb50>3.0.co;2-210.1002/1099-0488(20010101)39:1<47::AID-POLB50>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
7. Xiang C, Sue HJ, Chu J, Masuda K (2001) Polym Eng Sci 41(1):23. doi: 10.1002/pen.1070510.1002/pen.10705 ↗
8. Browning R, Lim GT, Moyse A, Sun L, Sue H-J (2006) Polym Eng Sci 46(5):601. doi: 10.1002/pen.2050710.1002/pen.20507 ↗
9. Moghbelli E, Browning RL, Boo WJ, Hahn SF, Feick LJE, Sue HJ (2008) Tribol Int 41(5):425. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2007.09.00810.1016/j.triboint.2007.09.008 ↗
10. Jardret V, Morel P (2003) Prog Org Coat 48(2–4):322. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2003.02.00210.1016/j.porgcoat.2003.02.002 ↗
11. Browning R, Jiang H, Moyse A, Sue H-J, Iseki Y, Ohtani K, Ijichi Y (2008) J Mater Sci 43(4):1357. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2283-510.1007/s10853-007-2283-5 ↗
12. Bucaille JL, Felder E (2002) Philos Mag A 82(10):200310.1080/01418610208235712 ↗
13. Jiang H, Lim GT, Reddy JN, Whitcomb JD, Sue HJ (2007) J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 45(12):1435. doi: 10.1002/polb.2116910.1002/polb.21169 ↗
14. Pelletier H, Gauthier C, Schirrer R (2008) Proc IME J J Eng Tribol 222(3):22110.1243/13506501JET334 ↗
15. Bucaille JL, Felder E, Hochstetter G (2001) Wear 249(5–6):422. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00538-510.1016/S0043-1648(01)00538-5 ↗
16. Bucaille JL, Felder E, Hochstetter G (2004) J Tribol 126(2):372. doi: 10.1115/1.164553510.1115/1.1645535 ↗
17. Bull SJ, Rickerby DS (1990) Surf Coat Technol 42(2):149. doi: 10.1016/0257-8972(90)90121-r10.1016/0257-8972(90)90121-R ↗
18. Demirci I, Gauthier C, Schirrer R (2005) Thin Solid Films 479(1–2):207. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.19410.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.194 ↗
19. Lim G, Wong M, Reddy J, Sue H (2005) J Coat Technol Res 2(5):361. doi: 10.1007/s11998-005-0004-z10.1007/s11998-005-0004-z ↗
20. Lim GT, Reddy JN, Sue HJ (2005) In: ACS symposium series, vol 912. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 166–180. doi: 10.1021/bk-2005-0912.ch01010.1021/bk-2005-0912.ch010 ↗
21. Lu YC, Shinozaki DM (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 396(1–2):77. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.12.045
22. Rodrigo A, Ichimura H (2001) Surf Coat Technol 148(1):8. doi: 10.1016/s0257-8972(01)01329-910.1016/S0257-8972(01)01329-9 ↗
23. Xie Y, Hawthorne HM (2002) Surf Coat Technol 155(2–3):121. doi: 10.1016/s0257-8972(02)00064-610.1016/S0257-8972(02)00064-6 ↗
24. Hare B, Moyse A, Sue H-J (2011) Packaging Technol Sci. doi: 10.1002/pts.96210.1002/pts.962 ↗
25. ASTM (2005) In: ASTM International, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken. doi: 10.1520/D7027-05E0110.1520/D7027-05E01 ↗
26. ISO (2008) In: Determination of scratch properties. 19252. International Standards Organization, International Book of ISO Standards, Philadelphia
27. Li K, Ni BY, Li JCM (1996) J Mater Res 11(6):1574. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1996.019710.1557/JMR.1996.0197 ↗
28. Zhang SL, Li JCM (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 344(1–2):182. doi: 10.1016/s0921-5093(02)00409-410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00409-4 ↗
29. Jiang H, Browning R, Sue H-J (2009) Polymer 50(16):4056. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.06.06110.1016/j.polymer.2009.06.061 ↗
30. Jiang H, Browning R, Whitcomb J, Ito M, Shimouse M, Chang T, Sue HJ (2010) Tribol Lett 37(2):159. doi: 10.1007/s11249-009-9505-810.1007/s11249-009-9505-8 ↗