Effects of atmospheric corrosion on fatigue properties of a medium carbon steel
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of atmospheric corrosion on fatigue properties were examined using a medium carbon steel, corroded in various atmospheres. Three different places, having various atmospheric conditions, were selected for the corrosion tests: (i) an industrial area, (ii) near the ocean, and (iii) beside a river in a hot spring region. A water and/or air electrochemical cell corroded the carbon steel to rust that had several forms, depending on the atmosphere. The form of the corrosion was distinguished visually and by spectroscopy. Strong oxidation occurred in all samples with the formation of rust. In addition, a more severe chemical reaction with chlorine was detected near the ocean although carbon was obtained in the industrial area. On the other hand, a high level of sulfur reacted with the sample near the river. Such chemical reactions gave rise to different corrosion mechanisms leading to different corrosion surfaces. A rough corrosion face with corrosion pits was obtained in two of the samples (industrial area and near the ocean), while a smooth surface was produced for the sample near the river. The change of the surface morphology clearly affected the fatigue strength, e.g., the rougher the sample surface, the lower the fatigue strength. On the basis of the corrosion system, details of the fracture and fatigue characteristics are discussed in the present work.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Karpenko GV, Litvin AK, Tkachev VI, Soshko AI (1975) Mater Sci 9:36710.1007/BF00715624 ↗
2. Moiseeva LS, Rashevskaya NS (2002) Russ J Appl Chem 75:162510.1023/A:1022223617203 ↗
3. Fukuzumi T, Komazaki S, Misawa T (2002) Iron Steel Inst Jpn 88:31
4. Brass AM, Chêne J (2006) Corros Sci 48:322210.1016/j.corsci.2005.11.004 ↗
5. McEvily AJ, Wei RP (1971) In: International corrosion conference series; NACE-2, 14–18 June 1971, p 38110.7901/2169-3358-1971-2-18 ↗
6. Magnin T, Chambreuil A, Chateau JP (1996) Int J Fract 79:14710.1007/BF00032932 ↗
7. Endo K, Komai K, Matsuda Y (1981) Bull Jpn Soc Mech Eng 24:131910.1299/jsme1958.24.1319 ↗
8. Komai K, Shikida T, Endo K (1985) Bull Jpn Soc Mech Eng 28:57110.1299/jsme1958.28.571 ↗
9. Dawson DB, Pelloux RM (1974) Met Trans 5:72310.1007/BF02644669 ↗
10. DuQuesnay DL, Underhill PR, Britt HJ (2003) Int J Fatigue 25:37110.1016/S0142-1123(02)00168-8 ↗
11. Dmytrakh IM, Pluvinage G, Qilafku G (2001) Mater Sci 37:18410.1023/A:1013202607619 ↗
12. Medved JJ, Breton M, Irving PE (2004) Int J Fatigue 26:7110.1016/S0142-1123(03)00069-0 ↗
13. Tokaji K, Ogawa T, Hwang JU, Kobayashi Y, Harada Y (1996) J Therm Spray Technol 5:26910.1007/BF02645877 ↗
14. Endo K, Komai K, Nkamuro N (1970) Bull Jpn Soc Mech Eng 13:83710.1299/jsme1958.13.837 ↗
15. Chitty JA, Pertuz A, Hintermann H, Puchi ES (1999) J Mater Eng Perform 8:8310.1361/105994999770347205 ↗
16. Erven KA, Matlock DK, Krauss G (1991) J Heat Treat 9:2710.1007/BF02833244 ↗
17. Gol’dshtein YE, Zaslavskii AY, Guseva ZF (1973) Met Sci Heat Treat 15:28610.1007/BF00660321 ↗
18. Blokhin VK, Narusova EY, Livanova OV, Filippov GA (2003) Met Sci Heat Treat 45:1010.1023/A:1023935827144 ↗
19. Hanaki S, Goto H, Yamashita M, Uchida H (2006) J Soc Mater Sci, Jpn 55:101110.2472/jsms.55.1011 ↗
20. Callister WD Jr (2007) Materials science and engineering, 7th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, p 237
21. Suresh S (2004) Fatigue of materials, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 157
22. Schoch W, Spahn H (1971) In: International corrosion conference series; NACE-2, 14–18 June 1971, p 5210.7901/2169-3358-1971-2-18 ↗
23. Shibata T (2006) J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 55:97910.2472/jsms.55.979 ↗