journal article·2014-02

Hot working behavior of a WE54 magnesium alloy

M. Lentz, S. Gall, F. Schmack, H. M. Mayer, W. Reimers

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 49· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The plastic deformation and recrystallization behavior of the commercial magnesium alloys WE54 was analyzed using the strain rates 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 5 s−1 in the temperature range from 400 to 550 °C. The dependence of the flow stress on the temperature and the strain rate was modeled using the Garofalo hyperbolic sine equation. Thereby, the activation energy for plastic deformation of 224 kJ mol−1 was determined considering the flow stress at a strain of 0.5. The analysis revealed a stress exponent of 3.2. Furthermore, processing maps were generated by plotting the efficiency of power dissipation and the instability parameter considering different instability criteria as a function of the temperature and the strain rate. Depending on these parameters the extent of the recrystallization and the localization of the nucleation varied, significantly. At 400 °C, the recrystallization is very limited and was observed at grain boundaries (GB), shear bands (SB), and twin boundaries (TW). Increasing temperatures result in an increased recrystallized fraction, while lower strain rates promote grain boundary nucleation and reduce the amount of SBN and TW. The prediction of the processing map was verified by large scale extrusion trials, which proof that the evaluation of hot compression data can provide an effective tool to establish viable processing parameters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Garofalo F (1963) Trans Metall Soc A.I.M.E 227:351
2. McQueen HJ, Ryan ND (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 322:4310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01117-0 ↗
3. Slooff FA, Zhou J, Duszczyk J, Katgerman L (2008) J Mater Sci 43:7165. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3014-210.1007/s10853-008-3014-2 ↗
4. Slooff FA, Dzwonczyk JS, Zhou J, Duszczyk J, Katgerman L (2010) Mater Sci Eng 527:73510.1016/j.msea.2009.08.070 ↗
5. Gall S, Huppmann M, Mayer HM, Müller S, Reimers W (2013) J Mater Sci 48:473. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6761-z10.1007/s10853-012-6761-z ↗
6. Al-Samman T, Gottstein G (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 490:41110.1016/j.msea.2008.02.004 ↗
7. Galiyev A, Kaibyshev R, Gottstein G (2001) Acta Mater 49:119910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00020-9 ↗
8. Galiyev A, Kaibyshev R, Sakai T (2003) Mater Sci Forum 419–422:50910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.419-422.509 ↗
9. Prasad YVRK, Gegel HL, Doraivelu SM, Malas JC, Morgan JT, Lark KA, Barker DR (1984) Metall Trans A 15:188310.1007/BF02664902 ↗
10. Prasad YVRK (2003) J Mater Eng Perform 12:63810.1361/105994903322692420 ↗
11. Prasad YVRK, Rao KP, Hort N, Kainer KU (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 502:2510.1016/j.msea.2008.10.041 ↗
12. Prasad BK, Narayan SP, Modi OP, Ramakrishnan N, Kumar AM, Sachdev AK (2012) Int J Mater Res 103:510.3139/146.110730 ↗
13. Carsí M, Rieiro I, Jiménez JA, Peñalba F, Ruano OA (2003) J Mater Process Technol 143–144:41610.1016/S0924-0136(03)00414-X ↗
14. Evangelista E, Spigarelli S (2002) Metall Mater Trans 33A:37310.1007/s11661-002-0098-1 ↗
15. Murty SVSN, Rao BN (1998) Mater Sci Eng A 254:7610.1016/S0921-5093(98)00764-3 ↗
16. Murty SVSN, Rao BN (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 267:15910.1016/S0921-5093(99)00122-7 ↗
17. Rajput SK, Dikovits M, Chaudhari GP, Poletti C, Warchomicka F, Pancholi V, Nath SK (2013) Mater Sci Eng. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.08057
18. Poletti C, Six J, Hochegger M, Degischer HP, Ilie S (2011) Steel Res Int 82:71010.1002/srin.201000276 ↗
19. Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H, Switzer E, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Wirth CJ, Windhagen H (2005) Biomaterials 26:355710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049 ↗
20. Witte F, Hort N, Vogt C, Cohen S, Kainer KU, Willumeit R, Feyerabend F (2008) Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 12:6310.1016/j.cossms.2009.04.001 ↗
21. Wang G, Ge S, Shen Y, Wang H, Dong Q, Zhang Q, Gao J, Wang Y (2012) Mater Sci Eng C 32:219010.1016/j.msec.2012.05.050 ↗
22. Beladi H, Barnett MR (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 452–453:30610.1016/j.msea.2006.10.125 ↗
23. Tang W, Chen R, Han E (2005) Mater Sci Forum 488–489:26910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.488-489.269 ↗
24. Goetz RL, Semiatin SL (2001) J Mater Eng Perform 10:71010.1361/105994901770344593 ↗
25. Watanabe H, Tsutsui H, Mukai T, Kohzu M, Tanabe S, Higashi K (2001) Int J Plast 17:38710.1016/S0749-6419(00)00042-5 ↗
26. Agnew SR, Duygulu Ö (2005) Int J Plast 21:116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
27. Anyanwu IA, Kamado S, Kojima Y (2001) Mater Trans JIM 42:121210.2320/matertrans.42.1212 ↗
28. Frost HJ, Ashby MF (2012) The plasticity and creep of metals and ceramics version of deformation-mecahnism maps. Cambridge University, Cambridge. http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/defmech/
29. Myshlyaev MM, McQueen HJ, Mwembela A, Konopleva E (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 337:12110.1016/S0921-5093(02)00007-2 ↗
30. Stanford N, Barnett MR (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 496:39910.1016/j.msea.2008.05.045 ↗
31. Bauser M, Sauer G, Siegert K (2001) Strangpressen. Aluminium Verlag, Düsseldorf
32. Feltham P (1956) Metal Treatment 23:440