Phase transformations and segregation in Fe–Ni alloys and nanoalloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Ordering and segregation properties of Fe–Ni alloys and nanoalloys are investigated by means of Metropolis Monte Carlo (MMC) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The model is based on an embedded atom potential which, according to thermodynamic integration, only stabilizes those phases that are observed experimentally. This stability is confirmed by MMC and the same phases are found stable in truncated octahedral nanoparticles containing no more than 201 atoms. At given composition, Ni segregates at {100} and nanoparticle surfaces on the Fe-rich side of the phase diagram, Fe segregates at intermediate compositions and no significant trend is predicted on the Ni-rich side. A BCC to L10 transition is observed to occur at a Ni fraction close to 0.32, both in bulk alloys and in nanoparticles. The transition gives rise to a change in the nanoparticle aspect ratio by a factor 21/2. Using MD, by varying temperature, it was possible to monitor a BCC to FCC transition in solid solution nanoparticles reversibly.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Wackerie T (2010) Magn IEEE Trans 46:32610.1109/TMAG.2010.2040465 ↗
2. http://perform60.net/
3. Howald RA (2003) Metal Mater Trans 34A:175910.1007/s11661-003-0142-9 ↗
4. Cacciami G, De Keyzer J, Ferro R, Klotz UE, Lacaze J, Wollants P (2006) Intermetallics 14:131210.1016/j.intermet.2005.11.028 ↗
5. Michin Y, Mehl MJ, Papaconstantopoulos DA (2005) Acta Mater 53:402910.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.001 ↗
6. Acet M, Schneider T, Wasserman EF (1995) J Phys IV 5:C2–C105
7. Kadau K, Griener M, Entl P, Kreth M (2003) Phase Trans 76:35510.1080/0141159021000051433 ↗
8. Krauss G (1999) Mater Sci Eng A273–275:4010.1016/S0921-5093(99)00288-9 ↗
9. Cayron C, Barcelo F, de Carlan Y (2010) Acta Mater 58:139510.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.046 ↗
10. Battacharya K, Conti S, Zanzotto G, Zimmer J (2004) Nature 58:1395
11. Hornbogen E (1992) Phys Status Solidi 172:16110.1002/pssb.2221720116 ↗
12. Zhao X, Lianf Y, Hu Z (1996) Nanostruct Mater 7:31310.1016/0965-9773(96)00008-6 ↗
13. Lu R, Cao A, Kang F, Wang W, Wei J, Gu J, Wang K, Wu D (2007) J Phys Chem C 111:1147510.1021/jp0730803 ↗
14. Zhurkin EE, Hou M (2000) J Phys Condens Matter 12:673510.1088/0953-8984/12/30/306 ↗
15. Bonny G, Pasianot RC, Malerba L (2009) Philos Mag 89:345110.1080/14786430903299337 ↗
16. Bonny G, Pasianot RC, Malerba L (2009) Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17:02501010.1088/0965-0393/17/2/025010 ↗
17. Mendelev MI, Han A, Srolovitz DJ, Ackland GJ, Sun DY, Asta M (2003) Philos Mag A83:397710.1080/14786430310001613264 ↗
18. Voter AF, Chen SP (1987) Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 82:17510.1557/PROC-82-175 ↗
19. Howald RA (2003) Metall Mater Trans A34:175910.1007/s11661-003-0142-9 ↗
20. Rossiter PL, Jago RA (1984) Materials research symposium proceedings. North-Holland, Amsterdam, p 409
21. Rossiter L, Lawrence PJ (1984) Philos Mag A49:53510.1080/01418618408236554 ↗
22. Reuter KB, Williams DB, Goldstein JI (1989) Metall Trans 20:71910.1007/BF02667589 ↗
23. Yang CW, Williams DB, Goldstein JI (1997) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:294310.1016/S0016-7037(97)00132-4 ↗
24. Cowley JM (1950) Phys Rev 77:66910.1103/PhysRev.77.669 ↗
25. Atanasov IS, Hou M (2009) Eur Phys J D52:51
26. Atanasov IS, Hou M (2009) Surf Sci 603:263910.1016/j.susc.2009.06.018 ↗
27. Taylor A (1961) X-ray metallography. Wiley, New York, p 965
28. Roussel JM, Tréglia G, Legrand B (2011) Solid State Phenom 172–174:100810.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.172-174.1008 ↗
29. Hosseini AA, Jones TP (1989) Phys Status Solidi 113:5710.1002/pssa.2211130107 ↗
30. Hsiao R, Mauri D (2000) Appl Surf Sci 157:18510.1016/S0169-4332(99)00571-1 ↗