journal article·2007-07

Investigation on influence of sodium- or strontium-modification on corrosion-resistance of Al–11.7%Si alloy

Hengcheng Liao, Guangming Dong, Guoxiong Sun

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Weight loss test in 4% sulfuric acid aqueous solution bath and salt spray test with 5% NaCl aqueous solution were used to evaluate the corrosion resistance of Al–11.7 wt%Si alloys with no modification, sodium modification, or strontium modification. SEM and optical microscopy were used to, respectively, observe the surface and depth corrosion morphologies of the alloys. The results showed that the corrosion-resistance of the alloy with no modification was the best, followed by the Sr-modified alloy, with the Na-modified alloy showing the worst results. Up to 360 h duration in 4% sulfuric acid aqueous solution bath, all the three alloys showed uniform corrosion characteristics. However, after 360 h duration, pitting corrosion became the typical characteristic of the modified alloys and it resulted in a considerable increase in percentage weight loss. After 480 h, the depth of the pitting holes in the Sr-modified alloy was larger than that in the Na-modified alloy, but the transverse corrosion channels in the former were far less than those in the latter. After this duration, the well-developed transverse corrosion channels in the Na-modified alloy became interconnected inch by inch, which led to severe exfoliation corrosion, so the percentage weight loss of the Na-modified alloy rose abruptly.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Chien CW, Lee SL, Lin JC, Jahn MT (2002) Mater Lett 52(4–5):33410.1016/S0167-577X(01)00418-9 ↗
2. Edwards WM, Thomson RC, Barnes SJ, Barnes SI (2002) Mater Sci Forum 396–402(2):62510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.396-402.625 ↗
3. Liu L, Samuel AM, Samuel FH, Doty HW, Valtierra S (2004) J Mater Sci 39(1):21510.1023/B:JMSC.0000007747.43275.34 ↗
4. Nogita K, McDonald SD, Dahle AK (2003) Mater Trans 44(4):69210.2320/matertrans.44.692 ↗
5. Liao H, Sun G (2004) Mater Sci Technol 20(4):52110.1179/026708304225016626 ↗
6. Liao H, Sun Yu, Sun G (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 335(1–2):6210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01949-9 ↗
7. Liao H, Ding Yi, Sun G (2002) Acta Metall Sinica 38(3):24510.1007/s101140200171 ↗
8. Bereket G, Yurt A (2001) Corros Sci 43(6):117910.1016/S0010-938X(00)00135-9 ↗
9. Sankaran KK, Perez R, Jata KV (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 297(1–2):22310.1016/S0921-5093(00)01216-8 ↗
10. Long X-Q, Jin W-H (2001) J Civil Aviat Univ China 19(3):55
11. Voevodinb N, Jeffcoatec C, Simonb L, Khobaibb M, Donleya M (2001) Surf Coat Technol 140(1):2910.1016/S0257-8972(01)01000-3 ↗
12. Lu G, Guang S, Chen H, Lin D (2005) Chinese J Nonferrous Met 15(5):734
13. Aballe A, Bethencourt M, Botana FJ, Cano MJ, Marcos M (2001) Corros Sci 43(9):165710.1016/S0010-938X(00)00166-9 ↗
14. Wang H, Wu J, Wang J, Wang H, Fang Z (2003) Electrochemistry 9(1):60
15. Zhang L, Zhou H (2002) Aluminium Fabrication 25(2):38
16. Mondolf LF (1988) In Aluminum alloys, structure and properties. Metallurgy Industry Press, Beijing, p 317 (in Chinese)