journal article·2002-11

The influence of solvent quality on the mechanical properties of thin cast isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) coatings

B. J. Briscoe, A. Akram, M. J. Adams, S. A. Johnson, D. M. Gorman

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 37· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Thin coatings of isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) were cast on glass from solvents of different quality, which was expected to result in different molecular morphologies. The elastic moduli and hardness of the coatings were measured using a nanoindenter. The aim was to examine the viability of this technique for assessing the influence of the morphology on the mechanical properties. The interpretation of the data was complicated by both the influence of the hard substrate and possibly by the plasticising effect of retained solvent in the bulk. Nevertheless, it was reasonable to conclude that a coating cast from a good solvent was stiffer and harder than that from a poor solvent. This is consistent with previous frictional and spectroscopic studies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. M. R. TANT and G. L. WILKES, Polym. Engng. Sci. 21 (1981) 874.10.1002/pen.760211403 ↗
2. L. REBENFELD, P. J. MAKAREWICZ, H.-D. WEIGMANN and G. L. WILKES, J. Macromol. Sci.—Rev. Macromol. Chem. C 15 (1976) 279.10.1080/15321797608065780 ↗
3. S. BISTAC and J. SCHULTZ, Prog. Org. Coatings 310 (1997) 347.10.1016/S0300-9440(97)00093-3 ↗
4. B. J. BRISCOE and A. C. SMITH, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 28 (1983) 3827.10.1002/app.1983.070281222 ↗
5. J. BRANDRUP and E. H. IMMERGUT, in “Polymer Handbook” (Wiley, New York, 1975).
6. K. L. JOHNSON, in “Contact Mechanics” (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).10.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
7. W. C. OLIVER and J. B. PETHICA, US Patent no. 4,848,141, July 1989.
8. W. C. OLIVER and G. M. PHARR, J. Mater. Sci. 7 (1992) 1564.
9. M. J. ADAMS, D. M. GORMAN and S. A. JOHNSON, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 649 (2001) Q7.10.1.
10. B. N. LUCAS and W. C. OLIVER, Metall. Mater. Trans. A— Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 30 (1999) 610.10.1007/s11661-999-0051-7 ↗
11. T. F. PAGE, G. M. PHARR, J. C. HAY, W. C. OLIVER, B. N. LUCAS, E. HERBERT and L. RIESTER, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 522 (1998) 53.10.1557/PROC-522-53 ↗
12. J. MENCIK, D. MUNZ, E. QUANDT, E. R. WEPPELMANN and M. V. SWAIN, J. Mater. Res. 12 (1997) 2475.10.1557/JMR.1997.0327 ↗
13. B. J. BRISCOE and P. S. THOMAS, STLE Trib. Trans. 38 (1995) 2382.10.1080/10402009508983418 ↗
14. L. C. TOWLE, J. Appl. Phys. 42 (1971) 2368.10.1063/1.1660550 ↗
15. B. J. BRISCOE and D. TABOR, J. Adhesion 9 (1978) 145.10.1080/00218467808075110 ↗
16. S. GLASSTONE, K. J. LAIDLER and H. EYRING, in “The Theory of Rate Processes” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941).