journal article·2000-09

Crystal plasticity analysis of stress–assisted martensitic transformation in Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al (wt.%)

M. Grujicic, Y. Zhang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

A new model based on crystal–plasticity, crystallography, thermodynamics, kinetics and statistics is developed for stress–assisted martensitic transformation. The model includes the essential features of the stress–assisted martensitic transformation, such as: nuclei of progressively lower potency are activated in the course of transformation, the martensite phase appears in the form of thin plates, the parent phase exerts a higher resistance toward the growth of a plate in the thickness than in the radial direction, the average plate size decreases while the average plate aspect ratio increases with the extent of transformation, etc. The model is implemented in the commercial finite element code ABAQUS/Standard to analyze the evolution of martensite, materials texture and the resulting equivalent stress–equivalent strain curve during the stress–assisted martensitic transformation under different stress and strain states in a polycrystalline Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al (wt.%) alloy. The equivalent stress–equivalent strain curves and the volume fraction of martensite–equivalent strain curves are found to be mainly controlled by the applied stress state. Conversely, the texture observed in the transformed Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al is found to be primarily controlled by the imposed macroscopic strain state. The validity of the proposed materials constitutive model has been established by demonstrating a reasonable agreement between the model predictions and the available experimental data.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. G. B. Olson, K. Tsuzaki and M. Cohen, Materials Research Symposium Proceedings 57 (1987) 129.10.1557/PROC-57-129 ↗
2. A. G. Evans and R. M. Cannon, Acta Met. 34 (1986) 761.10.1016/0001-6160(86)90052-0 ↗
3. G. B. Olson, in Sagamore Army Materials Research Conference Proceedings, 1987, edited by G. B. Olson, M. Azrin and E. S. Wright, p. 3.
4. M. Grujicic and P. Dang, Mater. Sci. Eng. A224 (1997) 187.10.1016/S0921-5093(96)10540-2 ↗
5. B. Budiansky, J. W. Hutchinson and J. C. Lambropoulos, Int. J. Solids Structures 19 (1983) 337.10.1016/0020-7683(83)90031-8 ↗
6. C. L. Hom and R. M. Mcmeeking, ibid. 26 (1990) 1211.10.1016/0020-7683(90)90057-3 ↗
7. M. Grujicic and N. Sankaran, ibid. 34 (1997) 4421.10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00012-7 ↗
8. N. Sankaran Idem., Int. J. Fracture 83 (1997) 337.10.1023/A:1007345127280 ↗
9. S. Kalidindi, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46 (1998) 267.10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00051-3 ↗
10. R. J. Asaro and A. Needleman, Acta Met. 33 (1985) 923.10.1016/0001-6160(85)90188-9 ↗
11. G. B. Olson and A. L. Roitburd, in “Martensite,” edited by G. B. Olson and W. S. Owen (ASM International, The Materials Information Society, 1992) p. 149.
12. I. W. Chen, Y. H. Chiao and K. Tsuzaki, Acta Met. 33 (1985) 1847.10.1016/0001-6160(85)90007-0 ↗
13. T. W. Duerig, G. T. Terlinde and J. C. Williams, Metal Trans. A 11A (1980) 1987.10.1007/BF02655118 ↗
14. A. G. Crocker, Journal de Physique, Colloque C4, Supplement au no 12 (1982) C4-209.
15. J. C. Williams, in “Titanium Science and Technology, Vol. 3,” edited by R. I. Jaffee and H. M. Burte (1973) p. 1433.
16. J. S. Bowles and J. K. Mackenzie, Acta Met. 2 (1954) 129.10.1016/0001-6160(54)90102-9 ↗
17. Y. Zhang, PhD thesis in Progress, Clemson University, May 1999.
18. Abaqus Standard Theory Manual, Version 5.7, Hibbit, Karlson and Sorensen, Inc., Providence, RI, 1997.
19. J. S. Kallend, U. F. Kocks, A. D. Rollett and J. R. Wenk, popLA: The Preferred Orientation Package from Los Alamos, 1994.