Study on high-temperature naphthenic acid corrosion and erosion-corrosion of aluminized carbon steel
Source abstract
Abstract
High-temperature naphthenic acid corrosion (NAC) and erosion-corrosion (NAEC) behaviors of pack-aluminized carbon steel have been investigated in laboratory to evaluate the resistance of aluminized layer to the NAC and NAEC. A field erosion-corrosion test of 700 days was also performed in an oil refinery. Parallel tests were carried out for carbon steel. It was found that the aluminized steel exhibited a better NAC resistance only at early testing stage than the carbon steel in high total-acid-number (TAN) environment. The NAC resistance degraded rapidly with increasing testing time, and became even worse than that of the carbon steel at final testing stage, accompanying a step-like or lamellar spallation in the aluminized layer. In low TAN environment, the aluminized steel exhibited a much better resistance to both the NAC and NAEC in comparison with the carbon steel. Similarly a good erosion-corrosion resistance was found for the aluminized steel in actual oil-refining environment although relatively serious erosion-corrosion attack simultaneously took place in the aluminized layer. Based on the above results, possible NAC and NAEC mechanisms for the aluminized steel are discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Petroleum Processing and Analysis · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Erosion and Abrasive Machining
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. E. Slavcheva, B. Shone and A. Turnbull, Br. Corros. J. 34 (1999) 125.10.1179/000705999101500761 ↗
2. W. A. Derungs, Corrosion 12 (1956) 617t.10.5006/0010-9312-12.12.41 ↗
3. A. J. Breen, Br. Corros. J. 9 (1974) 197.10.1179/000705974798321134 ↗
4. J. Gutzeit, Mater. Perform. 16 (1977) 24.
5. B. F. Ernesto and H. Brian, Corrosion'83 (1983), Paper No. 99.
6. G. L. Scattergood, R. C. Strong and W. A. Lindaley, Corrosion'87 (1987), Paper No. 197.
7. R. L. Piehl, Mater. Perform. 27 (1988) 37.
8. D. C. Agarwal, U. Brill and U. Heubner, Corrosion'92 (1992), Paper No. 451.
9. E. B. Kibala, H. L. Craig, G. L. Rusk, K. V. Blanchard, T. J. Rose, B. L. Uehlein, R. C. Quinter and M. A. Summers, Mater. Perform. 32 (1993) 50.
10. A. Jayaraman and R. C. Saxena, Corros. Prevent. Control 42 (1995) 123.
11. H. L. Craig, Corrosion'95 (1995), Paper No. 333.10.7556/jaoa.1995.95.8.452A ↗
12. M. J. Zetlmeisl, Corrosion'95 (1995), Paper No. 334.
13. M. J. Zetlmeisl, Corrosion'96 (1996), Paper No. 218.
14. H. L. Craig, Corrosion'96 (1996), Paper No. 603.10.7556/jaoa.1996.96.10.603 ↗
15. B. E. Hopkiason and S. A. Lagoven, Corrosion'97 (1997), Paper No. 502.
16. A. Turnbull, E. Slavcheva and B. Shone, Corrosion 54 (1998) 922.10.5006/1.3284811 ↗
17. R. D. Kane and M. S. Cayard, Mater. Perform. 38 (1999) 48.
18. S. Tebbal, Corrosion'99 (1999), Paper No. 380.
19. Y. M. Gao, J. J. Cheng, G. Yu, H. Y. Yang, D. Z. Cao and Y. J. Zhu, Corros. Sci. Protect. Technol. (in Chinese) 12 (2000) 27.
20. X. Q. Wu, H. M. Jing, Y. G. Zheng, Z. M. Yao and W. Ke, Mater. Corros. 53 (2002) 833.10.1002/1521-4176(200211)53:11<833::AID-MACO833>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗