journal article·2010-06

Rheological and thermal characteristics of a two phase hydrogel system for potential wound healing applications

Thomas J. Smith, James E. Kennedy, Clement L. Higginbotham

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Hydrogels fabricated from single polymers have been extensively investigated for wound healing applications. However, in many cases a single polymer cannot meet divergent demands in terms of both properties and performance. In this work, a two phase hydrogel was prepared by physically imbedding a xerogel in the core of a freeze thawed hydrogel. The outer hydrogel was prepared by freeze thawing poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and poly (acrylic acid) (PAA) while the xerogels were prepared by UV polymerisation of 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NVP). The rheological results indicated that the two phase hydrogels over a period of 2 weeks formed a strong interface and demonstrated greater physical strength. This suggested that the inner gel containing PVP diffused into the PVA/PAA hydrogel, which in turn increased hydrogen bonding, resulting in the overall increase in the stiffness of the gel. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) confirmed hydrogen bonding had occurred between the constituents of the two phase hydrogels. Thermal analysis suggested that T g of each of the samples was above 80 °C, which indicated no impact on the behaviour of the gel at body temperature, but did however, give an indication of the stiffness of the dry polymer.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Tendon Structure and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Winter GD (1962) Nature 193:29310.1038/193293a0 ↗
2. Quinn KJ, Courtney JM, Evans JH, Gaylor JDS, Reid WH (1985) Biomaterials 6:36910.1016/0142-9612(85)90095-X ↗
3. Kane JB, Tomkins RG, Yarmush M, Burke JF (1996) In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (eds) An introduction to materials in medicine. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 360–370
4. Wang PY, Samji NA (1980) Org Coat Plast Chem 42:628
5. Azad AK, Azad N, Chandrkrachang S, Stevens WF (2004) J Biomed Mater Res B 69B:21610.1002/jbm.b.30000 ↗
6. Kichöfen B, Wokalek H, Scheel D, Ruh H (1986) Biomaterials 7:6710.1016/0142-9612(86)90092-X ↗
7. Lopergolo LC, Lugao BA, Catalani LH (2003) Polymer 44:621710.1016/S0032-3861(03)00686-4 ↗
8. Hassan CM, Peppas NA (2000) Adv Polym Sci 153:3710.1007/3-540-46414-X_2 ↗
9. Ward IM, Hadley DW (1993) An introduction to the mechanical properties of solid polymers. Wiley, Chichester
10. Ricciardi R, Christine G, Guylaine D, Françoise L (2003) Polymer 44:337510.1016/S0032-3861(03)00246-5 ↗
11. Peppas NA (1987) In: Peppas NA (ed) Polymers, vol 2. CRS Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–48
12. Huang H, Gu L, Ozaki Y (2006) Polymer 47:393510.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.089 ↗
13. Razzak M, Darwis D, Zainuddin, Sukirno (2001) Radiat Phys chem 62:10710.1016/S0969-806X(01)00427-3 ↗
14. Ramazani-Harandi MJ, Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Yousefi AA, Ershad-Langroudi A, Kabiri K (2006) Polym Test 25:47010.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.01.011 ↗
15. Hernández R, Pérez E, Mijangos C, López DJ (2005) J Appl Polym Sci 46:7066
16. Yaung J-F, Kwei TK (1997) J Appl Polym Sci 69:92110.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980801)69:5<921::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
17. Soppimath KS, Kulkarni AR, Aminabhavi TM (2000) J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 111:2710.1163/156856200743472 ↗