Loss Simulation Analysis and Experimental Verification of Porous Fe3O4 Electromagnetic
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper focuses on the effect of the porosity of Fe 3 O 4 on electromagnetic wave (EMW) loss. The pore structures were based on the Voronoi method by MATLAB, and the electromagnetic fields were constructed based on COMSOL Multiphysics. The energy loss of EMWs with frequencies of 2–18 GHz through Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles with different porosities was simulated and analyzed. Well-defined porous Fe 3 O 4 nanostructures were synthesized by heating FeCl 3 ·6H 2 O, urea, and surfactant (TBAB) in an ethylene glycol solution. Then, the prepared samples were eroded with oxalic acid to obtain different porosities. The electromagnetic parameters of the experimental samples were tested to validate the simulation results. The results showed that increasing the porosity, to some extent, was beneficial to the impedance matching characteristics, thus improving the EMW loss. The simulation results with different porosities and the experimental results with varying pore volumes had some consistency. When the porosity of the digital model was 30.63% and the pore volume of the experimental samples was 0.3102 cm 3 /g, | Z in / Z 0 | was the closest to 1, indicating that the impedance matching was the best. At the same time, it was found that the pore volume of the material can be used to characterize the porosity during the experimental preparation, thus simplifying the data processing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory for Advance Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Surface Engineering, AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing 100024, China
School of Chemistry and Biological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12265310.1016/j.cej.2019.122653 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.05410.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.054 ↗
3. 10.1039/C6RA02359B10.1039/C6RA02359B ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.05110.1016/j.cej.2014.08.051 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.08710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.087 ↗
6. 10.1039/c3ce40221e10.1039/c3ce40221e ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20030448510.1002/adma.200304485 ↗
8. 10.1007/s40820-023-01043-310.1007/s40820-023-01043-3 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0895710.1021/acsnano.1c08957 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20230217210.1002/adfm.202302172 ↗
11. 10.1021/jp302409910.1021/jp3024099 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20046255110.1002/anie.200462551 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl048758u10.1021/nl048758u ↗
14. 10.1021/jp073837q10.1021/jp073837q ↗
15. 10.1021/jp803131u10.1021/jp803131u ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.05810.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.058 ↗
17. 10.1021/cm103441u10.1021/cm103441u ↗
18. 10.1021/jp200418j10.1021/jp200418j ↗
19. 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.09.04510.1016/j.powtec.2014.09.045 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0277710.1021/acs.iecr.9b02777 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10948-018-4766-910.1007/s10948-018-4766-9 ↗
22. 10.1002/pssa.20170103210.1002/pssa.201701032 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp203147q10.1021/jp203147q ↗
24. 10.1007/PL0000947510.1007/PL00009475 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.36170810.1063/1.361708 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0010-4485(98)00063-310.1016/S0010-4485(98)00063-3 ↗
27. 10.1145/116873.11688010.1145/116873.116880 ↗
28. 10.1086/31325010.1086/313250 ↗
29. 10.1080/01621459.1997.1047367010.1080/01621459.1997.10473670 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cad.2018.03.00710.1016/j.cad.2018.03.007 ↗
31. 10.3390/ma1307163510.3390/ma13071635 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.03.03310.1016/j.cplett.2019.03.033 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.508587610.1063/1.5085876 ↗
34. Kumar, T. N.; Mohan, L.; Karakkad, S. In Carbon Nanofiber Based Epoxy Nano Composites-An Innovative Material for Electromagnetic Shielding, AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing, 2019.10.1063/1.5100714 ↗
35. 10.1109/36.4670010.1109/36.46700 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0304-3886(02)00199-710.1016/S0304-3886(02)00199-7 ↗
37. 10.1039/c3ta10664k10.1039/c3ta10664k ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20220992410.1002/adfm.202209924 ↗
39. 10.1039/C4TA02815E10.1039/C4TA02815E ↗
40. 10.1039/C5TA00086F10.1039/C5TA00086F ↗
41. 10.1002/smll.20200350210.1002/smll.202003502 ↗
42. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01323.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01323.x ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.803510.1103/PhysRevB.56.8035 ↗
44. 10.1039/C5NR03176A10.1039/C5NR03176A ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10824610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108246 ↗
46. 10.1007/s40820-021-00727-y10.1007/s40820-021-00727-y ↗
47. 10.1038/126274a010.1038/126274a0 ↗
48. 10.1039/c2jm34273a10.1039/c2jm34273a ↗
49. 10.1039/c3ta00072a10.1039/c3ta00072a ↗
50. 10.1007/s40820-022-00904-710.1007/s40820-022-00904-7 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.03910.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.039 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.04.00510.1016/j.jmst.2022.04.005 ↗
53. 10.1002/adma.20221024310.1002/adma.202210243 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.01810.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.018 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12474310.1016/j.cej.2020.124743 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.169574310.1063/1.1695743 ↗
57. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/05500410.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055004 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.320495810.1063/1.3204958 ↗
59. 10.1021/jp911030n10.1021/jp911030n ↗