Adhesion along metal–polymer interfaces during plastic deformation
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper a numerical study is presented that concentrates on the influence of the interface roughness that develops during plastic deformation of a metal, on the work of adhesion and on the change of interface energy upon contact with a glassy polymer. The polymer coating is described with a constitutive law that mimics the behavior of Poly-Ethylene Terephthalate. It includes an elastic part, a yield stress, softening and hardening with increasing strains. For the interface between the metal and the polymer a mixed-mode (mode I and II) stress-separation law is applied that defines the interface energy and an interaction length scale. At the onset of deformation the surface of the substrate has a self-affine roughness characterized by the so-called Hurst exponent, a correlation length and an rms roughness amplitude, that evolves as a function of increasing strain. The findings are the following: the interface energy decreases until the strain at yield of the polymer coating. Interestingly, after yielding as the polymer starts to soften macroscopically, the decreasing average stress levels result in partial recovery of the interface energy at the interface. At higher strains, when macroscopic hardening develops the recovery of the interface stops and the interface energy decreases. The effect of coating thickness is discussed as well as the physical relevance of various model parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Hertz H (1882) J Reine Angew Math 92:15610.1515/crll.1882.92.156 ↗
2. Archard JF (1957) Proc R Soc London Ser A243:19010.1098/rspa.1957.0214 ↗
3. Greenwood JA, Williamson JBP (1960) Proc R Soc London Ser A295:300
4. Johnson KL (1985) Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
5. Bush AW, Gibson RD, Thomas TR (1975) Wear 35:8710.1016/0043-1648(75)90145-3 ↗
6. Persson BNJ, Bucher F, Chiaia B (2002) Phys Rev B 65(18): 18410610.1103/PhysRevB.65.184106 ↗
7. Hyun S, Pei L, Molinari JF, Robbins MO (2004) Phys Rev E 70(2):02611710.1103/PhysRevE.70.026117 ↗
8. Zhao Y, Wang GC, Lu TM (2001) Characterization of amorphous and crystalline rough surface. Principles and applications. Academic Press10.1016/S1079-4042(01)80055-2 ↗
9. van Tijum R, Vellinga WP, De Hosson JThM (2005) Linking length scales in the mechanical behavior of materials. In: Rudd RE, Balk TJ, Windl W, Bernstein N (eds) MRS Proceedings Volume 882E, EE3.2
10. Wouters O, Vellinga WP, van Tijum R and De Hosson JThM (2005) Acta Mater 53:4043–405010.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.007 ↗
11. van Tijum R, De Hosson JThM (2005) J Mater Sci 40:3503 DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-0414-410.1007/s10853-005-0414-4 ↗
12. Van der Giessen E (1997) Eur J Mech, A/Solids 16(special issue):87
13. Abdul-Baqi A, Van der Giessen E (2002) Int J Solid Struct 39(6):142710.1016/S0020-7683(01)00280-3 ↗
14. Xu XP, Needleman A (1993) Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 1:11110.1088/0965-0393/1/2/001 ↗
15. Persson BNJ, Tosatti E (2001) J Chem Phys 115:559710.1063/1.1398300 ↗
16. Palasantzas G, De Hosson JThM (2003) Phys Rev E 67:021604/1–610.1103/PhysRevE.67.021604 ↗
17. Krim J, Palasantzas G (1995) Int J Mod Phys B 9:59910.1142/S0217979295000239 ↗
18. Meakin P (1998) Fractals, scaling, and growth far from equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Sinha SK, Sirota EB, Garoff S, Stanley HB (1988) Phys Rev B 38:229710.1103/PhysRevB.38.2297 ↗
20. Yang HN, Lu TM (1995) Phys Rev E 51:247910.1103/PhysRevB.51.2479 ↗