Edge effects in compression testing periodic cellular metal sandwich cores
Source abstract
Abstract
Compression testing of cellular sandwich core materials is often complicated by the presence of edge effects, in which the cells on the outside of the specimen deform at lower stresses than those in the bulk. As a result, minimum specimen length-to-cell-size ratios have been established in the literature for metallic foams. Periodic cellular metals (PCMs) are a recently developed class of materials that have received considerable interest due to their greater architectural efficiency and enhanced mechanical properties compared to conventional metal foams. In this study, edge effects of PCM core materials have been measured in compression using a new test platform which evaluates the properties of the core as a stand-alone material. This approach introduces uniform and periodically rigid boundary conditions to the PCM nodes, resulting in the same inelastic buckling failure mechanism that occurs in reference PCM sandwich panels. Edge effects were comparatively small and samples down to 2 × 2 unit cells were found to be representative of bulk-like cores.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Ashby MF (2005) Philos Mag 85:323510.1080/14786430500079892 ↗
2. Wadley HNG (2006) Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 364:3110.1098/rsta.2005.1697 ↗
3. Bouwhuis BA, Hibbard GD (2006) Metall Mater Trans B 37:91910.1007/BF02735014 ↗
4. Suralvo M et al (2008) Scripta Mater 58:24710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.018 ↗
5. Chen C et al (1999) J Mech Phys Solids 47:223510.1016/S0022-5096(99)00030-7 ↗
6. Bastawros A-F et al (2000) J Mech Phys Solids 48:30110.1016/S0022-5096(99)00035-6 ↗
7. Chen C, Fleck NA (2002) J Mech Phys Solids 50:95510.1016/S0022-5096(01)00128-4 ↗
8. Brezny R, Green DJ (1990) J Mater Sci 25:457110.1007/BF01129908 ↗
9. Ashby MF et al (2000) Metal foams – a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 26–72
10. Andrews EW et al (2001) Int J Mech Sci 43:70110.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-6 ↗
11. Onck PR (2001) Int J Mech Sci 43:68110.1016/S0020-7403(00)00042-4 ↗
12. Onck PR (2003) MRS Bull April:27910.1557/mrs2003.81 ↗
13. Sypeck DJ, Wadley HNG (2002) Adv Eng Mater 4:75910.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10<759::AID-ADEM759>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
14. Simone AE, Gibson LJ (1998) Acta Mater 46:310910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00017-2 ↗
15. Ramamurty U, Paul A (2004) Acta Mater 52:86910.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.021 ↗
16. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2001) Int J Solids Struct 38:627510.1016/S0020-7683(01)00103-2 ↗
17. Kooistra GW et al (2004) Acta Mater 52:422910.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.039 ↗
18. Engesser F (1889) Zeitschrift des Architekten und Ingenieur – Vereins zu Hannover 35:455
19. Shanley FR (1947) J Aeronaut Sci 14:26110.2514/8.1346 ↗
20. Wadley HNG et al (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:233110.1016/S0266-3538(03)00266-5 ↗
21. Beer HNG, Johnston ER (1992) Mechanics of materials, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Toronto, pp 570–600
22. Perry SH, Chilver AH (1976) Proc Inst Civ Eng Part 2 – Res Theory 61:109
23. Schmidt LC et al (1982) J Struct Div 108:132410.1061/JSDEAG.0005969 ↗
24. Hanaor A et al (1989) J Struct Eng 115:102110.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:5(1021) ↗
25. Schraad MW (2007) Mech Mater 39:18310.1016/j.mechmat.2006.04.004 ↗
26. Tekoglu C, Onck PR (2005) J Mater Sci 40:591110.1007/s10853-005-5042-5 ↗
27. Öchsner A, Lamprecht K (2003) Mech Res Comm 30:57310.1016/S0093-6413(03)00058-2 ↗
28. Zupan M et al (2003) Int J Mech Sci 45:85110.1016/S0020-7403(03)00136-X ↗