Study on deformation behavior and strain homogeneity during cyclic extrusion and compression
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the plastic deformation behavior and strain homogeneity of the ZK60 Mg alloy during the multi-pass cyclic extrusion and compression (CEC) was simulated using the finite-element method (FEM) with a view to provide an insight into the mechanics of the process. Physical modeling (PM) experiment with same alloy was carried out to verify the results of the numerical simulations. The results show that two vortex flow regions with opposite flow direction are formed inside the cylindrical workpiece during CEC deformation. Although the deformation is inhomogeneous in both end regions of workpiece, a uniform region of equivalent strain exists, and the extent of uniform deformation increased with the increase in workpiece length.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Valiev RZ, Islamgaliev RK, Alexandrov IV (2000) Prog Mater Sci 45:103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-910.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
2. Valiev RZ, Estrin Y, Horita Z, Langdon TG, Zehetbauer MJ, Zhu YT (2006) JOM 58(4):33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0213-710.1007/s11837-006-0213-7 ↗
3. Lin JB, Wang QD, Peng LM, Peng T (2008) Mater Trans 49:1021. doi: https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MC20076610.2320/matertrans.MC200766 ↗
4. Valiev RZ (2007) J Mater Sci 42:1483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1281-310.1007/s10853-006-1281-3 ↗
5. Wang QD, Lin JB, Peng LM, Chen YJ (2008) Acta Metall Sinica 44(1):55
6. Richert J, Richert M (1986) Aluminium 62(8):604
7. Lin JB, Wang QD, Peng LM, Roven HJ (2008) J Alloys Compd. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.03110.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.031 ↗
8. Richert M, Liu Q, Hansen N (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 260:275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00988-510.1016/S0921-5093(98)00988-5 ↗
9. Lee SW, Yeh JW (2005) Metall Mater Trans A 36:2225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0341-710.1007/s11661-005-0341-7 ↗
10. Petrescu D, Savage SC, Hodgson PD (2002) J Mater Process Technol 125–126:361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00301-110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00301-1 ↗
11. Nagasekhar AV, Kim HS (2008) Comput Mater Sci. doi: 10.1016/jcommatsci2008.02.030
12. Zhao WJ, Ding H, Ren YP, Hao SM, Wang J, Wang JT (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 410–411:348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.13410.1016/j.msea.2005.08.134 ↗
13. Dumoulin S, Roven HJ, Werenskiold JC, Valberg HS (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 410–411:248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.10310.1016/j.msea.2005.08.103 ↗
14. Tham YW, Fu MW, Hng HH, Yong MS, Lim KB (2007) J Mater Process Technol 192–193:121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.03010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.030 ↗
15. Gavrus A, Massoni E, Chenot JL (1996) J Mater Process Technol 60:447. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02369-210.1016/0924-0136(96)02369-2 ↗
16. Rosochowski A, Olejnik L (2002) J Mater Process Technol 125–126:309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00339-410.1016/S0924-0136(02)00339-4 ↗
17. MSC.Superform 2005, Command reference manual
18. Richert M, Korbel A (1995) J Mater Process Technol 53:331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(95)01990-V10.1016/0924-0136(95)01990-V ↗
19. Choi I, Horgan CO (1977) J Appl Mech 44:42410.1115/1.3424095 ↗