Modeling of evolving damage in high temperature polymer matrix composites subjected to thermal oxidation
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper describes mechanism-based modeling of damage evolution in high temperature polymer matrix composites (HTPMC) under thermo-oxidative aging conditions. Specifically, a multi-scale model based on micro-mechanics analysis in conjunction with continuum damage mechanics (CDM) is developed to simulate the accelerated fiber–matrix debond growth in the longitudinal direction of a unidirectional HTPMC. Using this approach, one can relate the behavior of composites at the micro-level (representative volume element) to the macro-level (structural element) in a computationally tractable manner. Thermo-oxidative aging is simulated with diffusion-reaction model in which temperature, oxygen concentration, and weight loss effects are considered. For debond growth simulation, a model based on Darcy’s laws for oxygen permeation in the fiber–matrix interface is employed, that, when coupled with polymer shrinkage, provides a mechanism for permeation-controlled debond growth in HTPMC. Benchmark of model prediction with experimental observations of oxidation layer growth is presented, together with a laminate thermo-oxidative life prediction model based on CDM to demonstrate proof-of-concept.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Colin X, Verdu J (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.011 ↗
2. Colin X, Marais C, Verdu J (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.009 ↗
3. Tandon GP, Pochiraju KV, Schoeppner GA (2006) Polym Degrad Stab 91(8):1861. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.11.00810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.11.008 ↗
4. Pochiraju KV, Tandon GP (2006) J Eng Mater Technol 128:107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.212842710.1115/1.2128427 ↗
5. Pochiraju KV, Tandon GP, Schoeppner GA (2008) Mech Time-Depend Mater 12:45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-007-9042-510.1007/s11043-007-9042-5 ↗
6. Wang SS, Chen X (2006) J Eng Mater Technol 128:81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.213237710.1115/1.2132377 ↗
7. Talreja R (1991) Mech Mater 12:165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(91)90061-410.1016/0167-6636(91)90061-4 ↗
8. Talreja R (2006) J Mater Sci 41:6800. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0210-910.1007/s10853-006-0210-9 ↗
9. Crank J (1975) Mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
10. Roy S, Wang Y, Park S, Liechti KM (2006) ASME J Eng Mater Technol 128(1):11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.212795910.1115/1.2127959 ↗
11. Roy S, Wang Y, Park S, Xu D, Liechti KM (2007) J Mech Adv Mater Struct 14:1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1537649060098522710.1080/15376490600985227 ↗
12. Needleman A (1987) J Appl Mech 54:52510.1115/1.3173064 ↗
13. Wise J, Gillen KT, Clough RL (1997) Polymer 38:1929. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00716-110.1016/S0032-3861(96)00716-1 ↗
14. Williams JG (1984) Fracture mechanics of polymers. Ellis Horwood Limited
15. Coleman BD, Gurtin ME (1967) J Chem Phys 47:59710.1063/1.1711937 ↗
16. Smith GF (1982) Quart Appl Math 39:50910.1090/qam/644104 ↗
17. ABAQUS, Version 6.5 (2004) Hibbit, Karlsson, and Sorensen Inc., Providence, Rhode Island