journal article·2008-10

Modeling of evolving damage in high temperature polymer matrix composites subjected to thermal oxidation

Samit Roy, Sushil Singh, Gregory A. Schoeppner

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper describes mechanism-based modeling of damage evolution in high temperature polymer matrix composites (HTPMC) under thermo-oxidative aging conditions. Specifically, a multi-scale model based on micro-mechanics analysis in conjunction with continuum damage mechanics (CDM) is developed to simulate the accelerated fiber–matrix debond growth in the longitudinal direction of a unidirectional HTPMC. Using this approach, one can relate the behavior of composites at the micro-level (representative volume element) to the macro-level (structural element) in a computationally tractable manner. Thermo-oxidative aging is simulated with diffusion-reaction model in which temperature, oxygen concentration, and weight loss effects are considered. For debond growth simulation, a model based on Darcy’s laws for oxygen permeation in the fiber–matrix interface is employed, that, when coupled with polymer shrinkage, provides a mechanism for permeation-controlled debond growth in HTPMC. Benchmark of model prediction with experimental observations of oxidation layer growth is presented, together with a laminate thermo-oxidative life prediction model based on CDM to demonstrate proof-of-concept.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Colin X, Verdu J (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.011 ↗
2. Colin X, Marais C, Verdu J (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.009 ↗
3. Tandon GP, Pochiraju KV, Schoeppner GA (2006) Polym Degrad Stab 91(8):1861. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.11.00810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.11.008 ↗
4. Pochiraju KV, Tandon GP (2006) J Eng Mater Technol 128:107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.212842710.1115/1.2128427 ↗
5. Pochiraju KV, Tandon GP, Schoeppner GA (2008) Mech Time-Depend Mater 12:45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-007-9042-510.1007/s11043-007-9042-5 ↗
6. Wang SS, Chen X (2006) J Eng Mater Technol 128:81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.213237710.1115/1.2132377 ↗
7. Talreja R (1991) Mech Mater 12:165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(91)90061-410.1016/0167-6636(91)90061-4 ↗
8. Talreja R (2006) J Mater Sci 41:6800. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0210-910.1007/s10853-006-0210-9 ↗
9. Crank J (1975) Mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
10. Roy S, Wang Y, Park S, Liechti KM (2006) ASME J Eng Mater Technol 128(1):11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.212795910.1115/1.2127959 ↗
11. Roy S, Wang Y, Park S, Xu D, Liechti KM (2007) J Mech Adv Mater Struct 14:1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1537649060098522710.1080/15376490600985227 ↗
12. Needleman A (1987) J Appl Mech 54:52510.1115/1.3173064 ↗
13. Wise J, Gillen KT, Clough RL (1997) Polymer 38:1929. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00716-110.1016/S0032-3861(96)00716-1 ↗
14. Williams JG (1984) Fracture mechanics of polymers. Ellis Horwood Limited
15. Coleman BD, Gurtin ME (1967) J Chem Phys 47:59710.1063/1.1711937 ↗
16. Smith GF (1982) Quart Appl Math 39:50910.1090/qam/644104 ↗
17. ABAQUS, Version 6.5 (2004) Hibbit, Karlsson, and Sorensen Inc., Providence, Rhode Island