journal article·2009-07

Experimental investigation of mixed-mode fracture behaviour of woven laminated composite

Masood Nikbakht, Naghdali Choupani

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, the mixed-mode interlaminar fracture behaviour of woven carbon-epoxy composite was investigated based on experimental and numerical analyses. A modified version of Arcan specimen was employed to conduct a mixed mode fracture test using a special loading device. A full range of mixed-mode loading conditions including pure mode-I and pure mode-II loading were created and tested. This test method has a simple procedure, clamping/unclamping the specimens are easy to achieve and only one type of specimen is required to generate all loading conditions. Also, finite element analysis was carried out for different loading conditions in order to determine correction factors needed for fracture toughness calculations. Interlaminar fracture toughness was determined experimentally with the modified version of the Arcan specimen under different mixed-mode loading conditions. Results indicated that the interlaminar cracked specimen is tougher in shear loading condition and weaker in tensile loading condition. Response of woven carbon-epoxy composite was also investigated through several criteria and the best criterion was selected. The interlaminar fracture surfaces of the carbon-epoxy composite under different mixed-mode loading conditions are examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Dharmawan F, Simpson G, Herszberg I, John S (2006) Compos Struct 75:32810.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.020 ↗
2. Reeder JR, Crews JR (1990) AIAA J 28:127010.2514/3.25204 ↗
3. Banks-Sills L, Freed Y, Eliasi R, Fourman V (2006) Int J Fract 141:19510.1007/s10704-006-0084-5 ↗
4. Liu C, Huang Y, Lovato ML, Stout MG (1997) Int J Fract 87:24110.1023/A:1007419406590 ↗
5. Kim BW, Mayer AH (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:69510.1016/S0266-3538(02)00258-0 ↗
6. Arcan M, Hashin Z, Voloshin A (1978) Exp Mech 18:14110.1007/BF02324146 ↗
7. Banks-Sills L, Arcan M, Bortman Y (1984) Eng Fract Mech 20(1):14510.1016/0013-7944(84)90122-X ↗
8. Jurf RA, Pipes RB (1982) J Compos Mater 16:38610.1177/002199838201600503 ↗
9. Yoon SH, Hong CS (1990) Exp Mech 30:23410.1007/BF02322816 ↗
10. Choupani N (2008) Mater Sci Technol 478:229
11. Kinloch AJ, Wang Y, Williams JG, Yayla P (1993) Compos Sci Technol 47:22510.1016/0266-3538(93)90031-B ↗
12. Gilchrist MD, Svensson N, Shishoo R (1998) J Mater Sci 33:4049. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100443110454010.1023/A:1004431104540 ↗
13. Stevanovic D, Kalyanasundaram S, Lowe A, Jar PYB (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:194910.1016/S0266-3538(03)00162-3 ↗
14. Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M (1996) Compos Sci Technol 56(4):43910.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
15. Ducept F, Davies P, Gamby D (1997) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 28(8):71910.1016/S1359-835X(97)00012-2 ↗
16. Ducept F, Davies P, Gamby D (2000) Int J Adhes Adhes 20:23310.1016/S0143-7496(99)00048-2 ↗
17. Ducept F, Gamby D, Davies P (1999) Compos Sci Technol 59(4):60910.1016/S0266-3538(98)00105-5 ↗
18. Hashemi S, Kinloch AJ, Williams JG (1990) Compos Sci Technol 37:42910.1016/0266-3538(90)90013-U ↗
19. Kikuchi M, Kuroda M (1992) JSME Int J Ser 1 Solid Mech Strength Mater 35(4):49610.1299/jsmea1988.35.4_496 ↗
20. Naik NK, Reddy KS, Meduri S, Raju NB, Prasad PD, Azad SNM, Ogde PA, Reddy BCK (2002) J Mater Sci 37(14):2983. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101602523210210.1023/A:1016025232102 ↗
21. O’Brien TK (1998) Compos B Eng 29(1):5710.1016/S1359-8368(97)00013-9 ↗
22. Rikards R, Buchholz F-G, Wang H, Bledzki AK, Korjakin A, Richard H-A (1998) Eng Fract Mech 61(3–4):32510.1016/S0013-7944(98)00068-X ↗
23. Warrior NA, Pickett AK, Lourenc NSF (2003) Strain 39(4):15310.1046/j.1475-1305.2003.00088.x ↗
24. American Society for Testing and Materials (1991) Standard D5045-91a, plane-stain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials, annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM, Philadelphia
25. ABAQUS (2004) ABAQUS user’s manual, version 6.5. Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen, HKS Inc, Pawtucket, USA