Temperature and weldline effects on tensile properties of injection moulded short glass fibre PC/ABS polymer composite
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of weldline and temperature on tensile properties of injection moulded PC/ABS blend reinforced with different concentration levels of short glass fibres was investigated between 23 and 100 °C. The weldline was formed in the moulded specimens by direct impingement of two opposing melt fronts. It was found that weldline had no significant effect on tensile modulus with weldline integrity factor in the range of 1–0.98. Tensile modulus for both weld and unweld specimens increased linearly with increasing volume fraction of fibres, ϕf, and decreased linearly with increasing temperature. Tensile strength of both weld and unweld tensile specimens increased non-linearly with increasing ϕf reaching a maximum at ϕf≈ 0.16 for specimens without weldline and ϕf≈ 0.12 for specimens with weldline. A linear dependence with respect to ϕf was found for both weld and unweld tensile strengths for fibre volume fractions in the range 0–0.1. It was found that below the glass transition temperature of the matrix, tensile strength of the composite with and without weldlines decreased linearly with increasing temperature. The weldline integrity factor for tensile strength decreased with increasing ϕf, but showed no significant variation with respect to temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Kelly A, Tyson WR (1965) J Mech Phys Solids 6:13
2. Piggott MR, Ko M, Chuang HY (1993) Compos Sci Technol 48:29110.1016/0266-3538(93)90146-8 ↗
3. Piggott MR (1994) J Compos Mater 28:58810.1177/002199839402800701 ↗
4. Hashemi S, Gilbride MT, Hodgkinson JM (1996) J Mater Sci 31:501710.1007/BF00355900 ↗
5. Din KJ, Hashemi S (1997) J Mater Sci 32:37510.1023/A:1018553400266 ↗
6. Chrysostomou A, Hashemi S (1998) J Mater Sci 33:116510.1023/A:1004365323620 ↗
7. Nabi ZU, Hashemi S (1998) J Mater Sci 33:298510.1023/A:1004362915713 ↗
8. Chrysostomou A, Hashemi S (1998) J Mater Sci 33:449110.1023/A:1004487814709 ↗
9. Fu S-Y, Lauke B, Mader E, Yue C-Y, Hu X (2000) . Compos Part A 31:111710.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-3 ↗
10. Hashemi S (2002) Plast, Rubber Compos 31:31810.1179/146580102225005027 ↗
11. Thomason JL (2002) Compos Sci Technol 62:145510.1016/S0266-3538(02)00097-0 ↗
12. Thomason JL (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61:200710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00062-8 ↗
13. Thomason JL (2002) Compos Part A. 33:33110.1016/S1359-835X(01)00129-4 ↗
14. Cox HL (1952) Br J Appl Phys 3:7210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
15. Krenchel H (1964) Fiber reinforcement. Akad Forlag, Copenhagen
16. Kitagawa M (1977) J Polym Sci 15:1601