journal article·2009-03

Radius ratio effect on high-strain rate properties of syntactic foam composites

E. Woldesenbet, S. Peter

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The high-strain rate compressive properties of syntactic foams are characterized in this study. This study is performed using a pulse-shaped Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar technique. Nine different types of syntactic foams are fabricated with the same matrix resin system but three different size microballoons and three different microballoon volume fractions. The microballoons have the same outer radius of 40 μm, but different internal radii leading to a difference in their densities. The volume fractions of the microballoons in the syntactic foams are maintained at 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6. Analysis is carried out on the effect of the microballoon radius ratio at each volume fraction on the high-strain rate properties. This approach is helpful in separating and categorizing the contribution of matrix and microballoons to the dynamic compressive properties of syntactic foams. The results at high-strain rates are compared to quasi-static strain rate compressive properties of the same material. The results show that there is little or no significant change in both compressive strength and modulus of syntactic foams at all radius ratios when tested at strain rates of 400–500/s compared to quasi-static rates. However, higher dynamic strength and stiffness values are obtained consistently at all radius ratios when tested at 800–1000/s compared to quasi-static values. It is observed that the radius ratio does not affect the syntactic foam properties significantly when tested at the same high-strain rate and volume fraction. Scanning electron microscopy is carried out to understand the fracture modes of the syntactic foams.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids structures and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
2. Ashida K (1995) Handbook of plastic foams: types, properties manufacture and applications. Noyes Publications, NJ
3. Karthikeyan CS, Kishor E, Sankaran (2001) J Reinf Plast Compos 20(11):98210.1177/073168401772678922 ↗
4. Gupta N, Woldesenbet E (2003) Compos Struct 61(4):31110.1016/S0263-8223(03)00060-6 ↗
5. Noor AK, Burton WS, Bert CW (1996) Appl Mech Rev 49(3):15510.1115/1.3101923 ↗
6. Gupta N, Kishore E, Woldesenbet E (2001) J Mater Sci 36(18):448510.1023/A:1017986820603 ↗
7. Corigliana A, Rizzi E, Papa E (2000) Compos Sci Technol 60:216910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00118-4 ↗
8. Narkis M, Puterman M, Kenig S (1980) J Cell Plast 16:32610.1177/0021955X8001600603 ↗
9. Gupta N, Woldesenbet E (2004) J Cell Plast 40:46110.1177/0021955X04048421 ↗
10. Karthikeyan CS, Sankaran S, Jagdish Kumar MN et al (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 81:40510.1002/app.1452 ↗
11. Rizzi E, Papa E, Corignlina A (2000) Int J Solids Struct 37:577310.1016/S0020-7683(99)00264-4 ↗
12. D’Almeida JRM (1999) Compos Sci Technol 59:208710.1016/S0266-3538(99)00066-4 ↗
13. Bunn R, Mottram JT (1993) Composites 24(7):56510.1016/0010-4361(93)90270-I ↗
14. Progelhof RC (1986) in Proceedings of instrumented impact testing of plastics and composite materials, Houston, March 1986. ASTM, p 105
15. Sounik DF, Gansen P, Clemons JL et al (1997) J Mater Manuf 106(5):211
16. Hall W, Guden M, Yu CJ (2000) Scr Mater 34:51510.1016/S1359-6462(00)00460-7 ↗
17. Dannemann A, Lankford J (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 293:15710.1016/S0921-5093(00)01219-3 ↗
18. Mukai T, Kanahashi H, Miyoshi T et al (1999) Scr Mater 40(8):92110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00038-X ↗
19. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Int J Impact Eng 24(3):27710.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
20. Chen W, Lu F, Winfree N (2002) Exp Mech 42(1):6210.1007/BF02411053 ↗
21. Rinde A, Hoge KG (1971) J Appl Polym Sci 15:137710.1002/app.1971.070150608 ↗
22. Baker WE, Togami TC, Weider JC (1998) Int J Impact Eng 21(3):14910.1016/S0734-743X(97)00040-7 ↗
23. Zhao H, Gary G (1998) Int J Impact Eng 21(10):82710.1016/S0734-743X(98)00034-7 ↗
24. Song B, Chen W, Frew DJ (2004) J Compos Mater 38:91510.1177/0021998304040552 ↗
25. Woldesenbet E, Gupta N, Jadhav A (2005) J Mater Sci 40:400910.1007/s10853-005-1910-2 ↗
26. Gupta N, Woldesenbet, Kishore E (2002) J Mater Sci 37(15):319910.1023/A:1016166529841 ↗
27. Kolsky H (1949) Proc Phys Soc B 62:67610.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
28. Jadhav A, Woldesenbet E, Pang SS (2003) Composites Part B 34(4):33910.1016/S1359-8368(03)00003-9 ↗
29. Woldesenbet E, Gupta N, Jadhav A (2005) J Mater Sci 40:400910.1007/s10853-005-1910-2 ↗
30. Woldesenbet E, Vinson JR (1999) AIAA J 37(9):110210.2514/2.820 ↗
31. Woldesenbet E, Vinson JR (2001) J Compos Mater 35(6):50910.1177/002199801772662136 ↗