The strength of glass fibre reinforcement after exposure to elevated composite processing temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
The results of a study on the properties of glass fibres after thermal conditioning at typical engineering thermoplastic processing temperatures are presented. The mechanical performance of rovings and single fibres of well-defined silane sized and water sized E-glass fibre samples was investigated at room temperature after thermal conditioning at temperatures up to 400°C. Thermal conditioning for 15 minutes led to strength degradation of greater than 50% at higher temperatures. The tensile strength of silane coated fibres was relatively stable up to 300°C but exhibited a precipitous drop at higher conditioning temperatures. The water sized fibres exhibited an approximately linear decrease in strength with increasing conditioning temperature. The strength distribution of the water sized fibres could be well represented by a unimodal three parameter Weibull distribution. The strength distributions of the sized fibres were more complicated and required the use of a bimodal Weibull distribution. The results are discussed in terms of the changes in surface coating and bulk glass structure during heat conditioning.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Sato N, Kurauchi T, Sato S, Kamigaito O (1984) J Mater Sci 19:1145. doi: 10.1007/BF0112002310.1007/BF01120023 ↗
2. Sato N, Kurauchi T, Sato S, Kamigaito O (1988) J Compos Mater 22:850. doi: 10.1177/00219983880220090510.1177/002199838802200905 ↗
3. Horst JJ, Spoormaker JL (1997) J Mater Sci 32:3641. doi: 10.1023/A:101863453086910.1023/A:1018634530869 ↗
4. Thomason JL, Vlug MA, Schipper G, Krikor HGLT (1996) Compos Part A 27:1075. doi: 10.1016/1359-835x(96)00066-810.1016/1359-835X(96)00066-8 ↗
5. Thomason JL, Vlug MA (1997) Compos Part A 28:277. doi: 10.1016/s1359-835x(96)00127-310.1016/S1359-835X(96)00127-3 ↗
6. Thomason JL (1999) Compos Sci Technol 59:2315. doi: 10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00083-410.1016/S0266-3538(99)00083-4 ↗
7. Thomason JL, Adzima LJ (2001) Compos Part A 32:313. doi: 10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00124-x10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00124-X ↗
8. Murgatroyd JB (1944) J Soc Glass Technol 28:38810.1017/S0369852100000166 ↗
9. Sakka S (1957) Bulletin of the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto. University 34:316
10. Thomas WF (1960) Phys Chem Glasses 1:4
11. Tool AQ (1948) J Am Ceram Soc 31:17710.1111/j.1151-2916.1948.tb14287.x ↗
12. Feih S, Mouritz AP, Mathys Z, Gibson AG (2007) J Compos Mater 41:2387. doi: 10.1177/002199830707546110.1177/0021998307075461 ↗
13. Feih S, Manatpon K, Mathys Z, Gibson AG, Mouritz AP (2009) J Mater Sci 44:392. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3140-x10.1007/s10853-008-3140-x ↗
14. Piggott MR, Yokom JC (1968) Glass Technol 9:172
15. Militký J, Kovačič J, Rubnerová Vr (2002) Eng Fract Mech 69:1025. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00119-910.1016/S0013-7944(01)00119-9 ↗
16. Zinck P, Mäder E, Gerard JF (2001) J Mater Sci 36:5245. doi: 10.1023/A:101241031560110.1023/A:1012410315601 ↗
17. Feih S, Thraner A, Lilholt H (2005) J Mater Sci 40:1615. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-0661-410.1007/s10853-005-0661-4 ↗
18. Yang L, Thomason JL (2013) J Mater Sci 48:1947. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6960-710.1007/s10853-012-6960-7 ↗
19. Yang L, Thomason JL (2013) J Mater Sci 48:5768. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7369-710.1007/s10853-013-7369-7 ↗
20. Weibull W (1951) J Appl Mech 18:29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
21. Trustrum K, Jayatilaka AD (1979) J Mater Sci 14:1080. doi: 10.1007/BF0056129010.1007/BF00561290 ↗
22. Asloun M, Donnet JB, Guilpain G, Nardin M, Schultz J (1989) J Mater Sci 24:3504. doi: 10.1007/BF0238573210.1007/BF02385732 ↗
23. Zwaag Svd (1989) J Test Eval 17:292. doi: 10.1520/JTE11131J10.1520/JTE11131J ↗
24. Masson JJ, Bourgain E (1992) Int J Fract 55:303. doi: 10.1007/BF0003518810.1007/BF00035188 ↗
25. Thomason JL (2013) Compos Sci Technol 77:74. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.009 ↗
26. Lund MD, Yue Y (2010) J Am Ceram Soc 93:3236. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03879.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03879.x ↗
27. Welch RC, Smith JR, Potuzak M et al (2013) Phys Rev Lett 110:26590110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.265901 ↗
28. Beetz CP Jr (1982) Fibre Sci Technol 16:45. doi: 10.1016/0015-0568(82)90015-x10.1016/0015-0568(82)90015-X ↗
29. Zinck P, Pay MF, Rezakhanlou R, Gerard JF (1999) J Mater Sci 34:2121. doi: 10.1023/A:100457211247010.1023/A:1004572112470 ↗
30. Stoner EG, Edie DD, Durham SD (1994) J Mater Sci 29:6561. doi: 10.1007/BF0035402210.1007/BF00354022 ↗
31. Thomason JL (1995) Composites 26:487. doi: 10.1016/0010-4361(95)96806-H10.1016/0010-4361(95)96806-H ↗