journal article·2007-09-21

Electrokinetic properties of barite nanoparticles suspensions in different electrolyte media

Jian Zhong Hang, Yu Fang Zhang, Li Yi Shi, Xin Feng

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, electrokinetic properties of barite nanoparticles have been investigated in water. A series of systematic zeta potential measurements have been performed to determine the isoelectric point (iep) and potential-determining ions (pdi), and the effect of mono-, di-, and trivalent anions sodium salts such as NaCl, NaNO3, NaCH3COO, Na2SO4, Na2CO3, and Na3PO4 on the zeta potential of barite nanoparticles. Barite nanoparticles yields an isoelectric point at pH 7.8. The zeta potential for the barite nanoparticles has ranged from +15.5 mV at pH ∼ 3 to −19.8 mV at pH ∼ 9.5 at 25 ± 1 °C in water. It is proved that the valency of the ions greatly influence on the electrokinetic behavior of the suspension. Monovalent anions were found to have a weak effect on the zeta potentials. The negative zeta potentials were observed in the presence of di- and trivalent anions. Charge reversal was observed for divalent anions at 1 × 10−2 M and for trivalent anions at 1 × 10−1 M. It was considered that monovalent anions are indifferent ions and di- and trivalent anions are potential-determining ions. A schematic adsorption model which accounts for the adsorption of mono- and multivalent anions in the electrical double layer of barite nanoparticles is proposed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Somasundaran P, Fuerstenau DW (1966) J Phys Chem 70:9010.1021/j100873a014 ↗
2. Ma KS, Pierre AC (1999) Clays Clay Miner 47:52210.1346/CCMN.1999.0470415 ↗
3. Penner D, Lagaly G (2000) Clays Clay Miner 48:24610.1346/CCMN.2000.0480211 ↗
4. Lopez-Quintela MA, Rivas J (1993) J Coll Interf Sci 158:44610.1006/jcis.1993.1277 ↗
5. Joselevich E, Willner I (1994) J Phys Chem 98:762810.1021/j100082a039 ↗
6. Unsworth J, Lunn BA, Innis PC (1993) J Mater Sci Lett 3:13210.1007/BF00819937 ↗
7. Hang JZ, Shi LY (2005) Annual meeting memoir of shanghai particle association, p 96
8. Doğan M, Alkan M, Cakýr Ü (1997) J Coll Interf Sci 192:11410.1006/jcis.1997.4913 ↗
9. Rossi S, Luckham PF, Tadros TF (2002) Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 201:8510.1016/S0927-7757(01)00792-0 ↗
10. Ersoy B, Celik MS (2002) Micropor Mesopor Mater 55:30510.1016/S1387-1811(02)00433-X ↗
11. Yükselen Y, Kaya A (2003) Water Air Soil Pollut 145:15510.1023/A:1023684213383 ↗
12. Alkan M, Demirbas Ö, Doğan M (2005) J Coll Interf Sci 281:24010.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.036 ↗
13. Dobias B (1995) Flotation science and technology. K.A. Matis Dekker, New York, p 207
14. Kulkarni RD, Somasundaran P (1976) Powder Technol 14:27910.1016/0032-5910(76)80076-9 ↗
15. Kulkarni RD, Somasundaran P (1977) Int J Miner Process 4:8910.1016/0301-7516(77)90018-7 ↗
16. Williams DJA, Williams KP (1978) J Coll Interf Sci 65:7910.1016/0021-9797(78)90260-6 ↗
17. Celik MS, Somasundaran P (1980) Coll Surf 1:12110.1016/0166-6622(80)80041-2 ↗
18. Gülgŏnül Í (1995) Master Thesis, Ístanbul Technical University, Mining Faculty, Ístanbul, Turkey (in Turkish)
19. Kelly EG, Spottiswood DJ (1982) Introduction to mineral processing. Wiley, New York, p 99
20. James RO, Davis JA, Leckie JO (1978) J Coll Interf Sci 63:48010.1016/S0021-9797(78)80017-4 ↗
21. Kinniburgh DG (1981) In: Anderson MA (ed) Adsorption of inorganic solid–liquid interfaces. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI, p 104
22. Usui S (1984) Surfactant science series. Dekker, New York, p 15