journal article·2000-07

A comparison of sensitization kinetics in 304 and 316 stainless steels

E. Almanza, L. E. Murr

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

The effects of tensile and cold rolling strain (up to 40%) over a range of grain sizes ranging from 300 μm to 10 μm on sensitization (and desensitization) were observed and compared for 304 and 316 stainless steel having a constant carbon content of 0.05%; at 670°C. Rapid sensitization-desensitization was observed for both materials at the smallest grain size, and plots of degree of sensitization (DOS) data with time, temperature, and tensile strain coupled with chromium diffusivity data for 304 stainless steel allowed activation energies to be calculated from corresponding Arrhenius plots utilizing supplemental data from Beltran, et al. [1] at 625°C and 775°C. Values of 1.9 and 2 kcal/mol were found for unstrained and 20% strained samples for 11 μm grain size while corresponding values at 175 μm grain size were 55 and 32 kcal/mol respectively. Activation energies for unstrained and 10% strained 316 stainless steel for 135 μm grain size were found to be 76 and 64 kcal/mol, respectively. Sensitization was more rapid for cold-rolling versus tensile straining in both stainless steels, and there was no detectable sensitization for the largest grain size regime of the 316 stainless steel up to 10 h aging time at 670°C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. R. Beltran, J. G. Maldonado, L. E. Murr and W. W. W. Fisher, Acta Mater. 45(10) (1997) 4351.10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00106-7 ↗
2. C. L. Briant and A. M. Ritter, Scripta Metall. 13 (1979) 177.10.1016/0036-9748(79)90288-6 ↗
3. Idem., Metall. Trans. 11A (1981) 910.10.1007/BF02648358 ↗
4. A. Bose and P. K. De, Corrosion 43 (1987) 624.10.5006/1.3583841 ↗
5. L. E. Murr, A. H. Advani, S. Shankar and D. G. Atteridge, Mater. Characterization 24 (1990) 135.10.1016/1044-5803(90)90032-F ↗
6. A. H. Advani, L. E. Murr, D. G. Atteridge, R. Chelakara and S. M. Bruemmer, Corrosion 47 (1991) 939.10.5006/1.3585206 ↗
7. A. H. Advani, L. E. Murr, D. G. Atteridge and R. Chelakara, Metall. Trans. 22A (1991) 2917.10.1007/BF02650252 ↗
8. E. A. Trillo, R. Beltran, J. G. Maldonado, R. J. Romero, L. E. Murr, W. W. Fisher and A. H. Advani, Mater. Characterization 35 (1995) 99.10.1016/1044-5803(95)00072-0 ↗
9. E. A. Trillo and L. E. Murr, Acta Mater. 47(1) (1998) 235.10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00322-X ↗
10. J. G. Maldonado, A. H. Advani, L. E. Murr and W. W. Fisher, in “Microstructural Science, Vol. 21,” edited by C. R. Brooks and M. R. Louthan, Jr. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994) p. 23.
11. J. G. Maldonado, L. E. Murr and W. W. Fisher, in Iron and Steel Society Proceedings, 37th MWSP Conf. Proc., ISS XXXIII, 1996, p. 849.
12. L. E. Murr, K. P. Staudhammer and S. S. Hecker, Metall. Trans. 13A (1982) 627.10.1007/BF02644428 ↗
13. K. P. Staudhammer, L. E. Murr and S. S. Hecker, Acta Metall. et Materialia 33 (1983) 267.10.1016/0001-6160(83)90103-7 ↗
14. Standard test method for determining average grain size, Annual Book of Standards, 3.01 (E112-88) (American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1988).
15. A. H. Advani, Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon Graduate Institute, Portland, OR, 1989.
16. S. M. Bruemmer, Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon Graduate Insti-tute, Portland, OR, 1988.
17. T. Thorvaldasson and A. Salwen, Scripta Metall. 18 (1984) 739.10.1016/0036-9748(84)90331-4 ↗
18. R. Beltran, M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at EI Paso, EI Paso, TX, 1996.
19. P. L. Andresen, D. D. Solomon and D. F. Taylor, EPRI NP-1823, Project 1072-1 (Final Report), Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, May, 1981.