Impact properties of glass fibre/impact modifier/polypropylene hybrid composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The impact properties of glass-fibre/impact-modifier/polypropylene (GF/IM/PP) hybrid composites were characterized using a number of impact test methods. For the IM/PP blends, the impact fracture toughness can be measured using linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. For the GF/IM/PP hybrids, due to their non-compliance with LEFM, the essential work of fracture approach was employed. The impact properties of the IM/PP blends increased with IM concentration, while that of the GF/IM/PP hybrids did not change very much with IM content. It was concluded that cavitation of the PP matrix around the IM particles was the major toughening mechanism in the IM/PP blends. However, in the GF/IM/PP hybrids, the toughening effect due to cavitation was suppressed due to the introduction of short glass fibres (≈15 vol%). It is believed that the local stress in the matrix was relieved by fibre/matrix debonding of the relatively weak fibre/matrix interface. Thus, the presence of the IM particles was rendered insignificant in the GF/IM/PP hybrids.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. S. C. Tjong, J. S. Shen and R. K. Y. Li, Polymer 37 (1996) 2309.10.1016/0032-3861(96)85340-7 ↗
2. J. S. Shen and R. K. Y. Li Idem., Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 (1996) 100.10.1002/pen.10390 ↗
3. D. E. Spahr, K. Friedrich, J. M. Schultz and R. S. Bailey, J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990) 4427.10.1007/BF00581104 ↗
4. S. F. Bush, F. Yilmaz and P. F. Zhang, Plast. Rubb. & Compos. Process. Appl. 24 (1995) 139.
5. J. Karger-Kocsis, T. Harmia and T. Czigany, Comp. Sci. Technol. 54 (1995) 287.10.1016/0266-3538(95)00068-2 ↗
6. S. Hashemi and M. Koohgilani, Polym. Eng. Sci. 35 (1995) 1124.10.1002/pen.760351309 ↗
7. L. S. Chen, Y. W. Mai and B. Cotterell, omPolym. Eng. Sci.ibid. 29 (1989) 505.10.1002/pen.760290804 ↗
8. T. Vu-Khanh, J. Thermoplastic Compos. Mater. 4 (1991) 46.10.1177/089270579100400103 ↗
9. P. H. Th. Vollenberg and D. Heikens, J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990) 3089.10.1007/BF00587655 ↗
10. J. Karger-Kocsis, Polymer 20 (1979) 37.10.1016/0032-3861(79)90039-9 ↗
11. J. Karger-Kocsis and V. N. Kuleznev, omPolymer ibid. 23 (1982) 699.10.1016/0032-3861(82)90054-4 ↗
12. C. J. Chou, K. Vijayan, D. Kirby, A. Hittner and E. Baer, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 2521.10.1007/BF01111912 ↗
13. W. Y. Tam, T. Cheung and R. K. Y. Li, Polymer Testing 15 (1996) 363.10.1016/0142-9418(95)00041-0 ↗
14. S. V. Nair, M. L. Shiao and P. D. Garrett, J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 1085.10.1007/BF01197664 ↗
15. W. Y. Chiang, W. D. Yang and B. Pukanszky,Polym. Eng. Sci. 32 (1992) 641.10.1002/pen.760321002 ↗
16. J. G. Williams, “Fracture Mechanics of Polymers” (Ellis Harwood, Chichester, 1984).
17. J. S. Wu, Y. W. Mai and B. Cotterell, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 3373.10.1007/BF00354261 ↗
18. J. S. Wu and Y. W. Mai, Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 (1996) 2275.10.1002/pen.10626 ↗
19. S. Hashemi and J. Mugan, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 3983.10.1007/BF00351218 ↗