DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2025-12

A novel L-BFGS-B optimized machine learning model for predicting tensile strength of SLM-manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloys

B. S Arun, V. N Ajukumar, R Anand Sekhar

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 47
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Metals & alloys

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Armstrong M, Mehrabi H, Naveed N (2022) An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology. J Manuf Process 84:1001–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.06010.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.060 ↗
2. Mobarak MH, Islam MA, Hossain N et al (2023) Recent advances of additive manufacturing in implant fabrication: a review. Appl Surf Sci Adv 18:100462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.10046210.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100462 ↗
3. Wu W, Li X, Liu Q et al (2022) Additive manufacturing of bulk metallic glass: principles, materials and prospects. Mater Today Adv 16:100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.10031910.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100319 ↗
4. Malakizadi A, Bertolini R, Ducobu F et al (2022) Recent advances in modelling and simulation of surface integrity in machining: a review. Procedia CIRP 115:232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.10.07910.1016/j.procir.2022.10.079 ↗
5. Sefene EM (2022) State-of-the-art of selective laser melting process: a comprehensive review. J Manuf Syst 63:250–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.00210.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.002 ↗
6. Vafadar A, Guzzomi F, Rassau A, Hayward K (2021) Advances in metal additive manufacturing: a review of common processes, industrial applications, and current challenges. Appl Sci 11:1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1103121310.3390/app11031213 ↗
7. Gunasekaran J, Sevvel P, John Solomon I (2021) Metallic materials fabrication by selective laser melting: a review. Mater Today Proc 37:252–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.16210.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.162 ↗
8. Yu A, Xu W, Lu X et al (2023) Development and characterizations of graded porous titanium scaffolds via selective laser melting for orthopedics applications. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 33:1755–1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(23)66219-310.1016/S1003-6326(23)66219-3 ↗
9. Narasimhulu A, Shishodia S, Vani VV (2022) Analysis of Ti6Al4V Alloy Prototype Fabricated via Selective Laser Melting. In: Advanced Production and Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.3233/atde22075710.3233/atde220757 ↗
10. Wang X, Keya T, Chou K (2016) Build height effect on the Inconel 718 parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Procedia Manuf 5:1006–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.08910.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.089 ↗
11. Jain S, Corliss M, Tai B, Hung WN (2019) Electrochemical polishing of selective laser melted Inconel 718. Procedia Manuf 34:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.14510.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.145 ↗
12. Macoretta G, Bertini L, Monelli BD, Berto F (2023) Productivity-oriented SLM process parameters effect on the fatigue strength of Inconel 718. Int J Fatigue 168:107384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10738410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107384 ↗
13. Nandhakumar R, Venkatesan K (2023) A process parameters review on selective laser melting-based additive manufacturing of single and multi-material: microstructure, physical properties, tribological, and surface roughness. Mater Today Commun 35:105538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10553810.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105538 ↗
14. Singh N, Hameed P, Ummethala R et al (2020) Selective laser manufacturing of Ti-based alloys and composites: impact of process parameters, application trends, and future prospects. Mater Today Adv 8:100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.10009710.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100097 ↗
15. Oyesola M, Mpofu K, Mathe N et al (2021) Optimization of selective laser melting process parameters for surface quality performance of the fabricated Ti6Al4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114:1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06953-310.1007/s00170-021-06953-3 ↗
16. Yao B, Peng Y, Li Z et al (2024) Process parameter optimization for selective laser melting Ti-6Al-4V with high layer thickness. Mater Today Commun 41:110781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11078110.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110781 ↗
17. Wang L, Ma C, Huang J et al (2017) Microstructure and tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloys manufactured by selective laser melting with optimized processing parameters. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 265:012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/265/1/01201510.1088/1757-899X/265/1/012015 ↗
18. Singla AK, Banerjee M, Sharma A et al (2021) Selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V alloy: process parameters, defects and post-treatments. J Manuf Process 64:161–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.00910.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.009 ↗
19. Svyetlichnyy D (2024) Simulation of the selective laser sintering/melting process of bioactive glass 45S5. Simul Model Pract Theory 136:103009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2024.10300910.1016/j.simpat.2024.103009 ↗
20. Li S, Guo S, Huang H et al (2024) Microstructure and mechanical properties of TC4/TA2 honeycomb structure fabricated by selective laser melting(SLM). J Alloys Compd 1002:175437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17543710.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175437 ↗
21. Wu T, Li C, Sun F et al (2024) Reduction in residual stress and distortion of thin-walled Inconel 718 specimens fabricated by selective laser melting: experiment and numerical simulation. Int J Press Vessels Piping 212:105292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.10529210.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105292 ↗
22. Carter FM, Porter C, Kozjek D et al (2024) Machine learning guided adaptive laser power control in selective laser melting for pore reduction. CIRP Ann 73:149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.04310.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.043 ↗
23. Li J, Yang Z, Qian G, Berto F (2022) Machine learning based very-high-cycle fatigue life prediction of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Fatigue 158:106764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10676410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106764 ↗
24. Xu W, Li X, Zhang J (2022) Multi-feature fusion imaging via machine learning for laser ultrasonic based defect detection in selective laser melting part. Opt Laser Technol 150:107918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10791810.1016/j.optlastec.2022.107918 ↗
25. Shi T, Sun J, Li J et al (2023) Machine learning based very-high-cycle fatigue life prediction of AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Fatigue 171:107585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10758510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107585 ↗
26. Sah AK, Agilan M, Dineshraj S et al (2022) Machine learning-enabled prediction of density and defects in additively manufactured Inconel 718 alloy. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10319310.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103193 ↗
27. Theeda S, Jagdale SH, Ravichander BB, Kumar G (2023) Optimization of process parameters in laser powder bed fusion of SS 316L parts using artificial neural networks. Metals (Basel) 13(5):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1305084210.3390/met13050842 ↗
28. Shen T, Zhang W, Li B (2023) Machine learning-enabled predictions of as-built relative density and high-cycle fatigue life of Ti6Al4V alloy additively manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Today Commun 37:107286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10728610.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107286 ↗
29. Banerjee M, Banerjee A, Mukherjee D, et al (2023) Machine Learning Module for Predicting Tensile Response of SLMed Ti-6Al-4V. In: Advances in Additive Manufacturing and Metal Joining. pp 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7612-4_1810.1007/978-981-19-7612-4_18 ↗
30. Equbal MA, Equbal A, Khan ZA, Badruddin IA (2025) Machine learning in additive manufacturing: a comprehensive insight. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 8:264–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.10.00210.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.10.002 ↗
31. Inayathullah S, Buddala R (2025) Review of machine learning applications in additive manufacturing. Results Eng 25:103676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10367610.1016/j.rineng.2024.103676 ↗
32. Butt MM, Rashid S, Haq M, ul, et al (2025) Machine learning driven prediction and GUI based optimization of quasi-static mechanical properties in SLM fabricated Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-025-01360-010.1007/s12541-025-01360-0 ↗
33. Baturynska I, Semeniuta O, Martinsen K (2018) Optimization of process parameters for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing by combination of machine learning and finite element method: a conceptual framework. Procedia CIRP 67:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.20410.1016/j.procir.2017.12.204 ↗
34. Akbari P, Zamani M, Mostafaei A (2024) Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 91:104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.10432010.1016/j.addma.2024.104320 ↗
35. Sharma R, Raj Paul A, Mukherjee M et al (2023) Forecasting of process parameters using machine learning techniques for wire arc additive manufacturing process. Mater Today Proc 80:248–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.08110.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.081 ↗
36. Liu Q, Wu D (2024) Machine learning and feature representation approaches to predict stress-strain curves of additively manufactured metamaterials with varying structure and process parameters. Mater Des 241:112932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11293210.1016/j.matdes.2024.112932 ↗
37. Maitra V, Shi J, Lu C (2022) Robust prediction and validation of as-built density of Ti-6Al-4V parts manufactured via selective laser melting using a machine learning approach. J Manuf Process 78:183–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.02010.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.020 ↗
38. Cao Y, Chen C, Xu S et al (2024) Machine learning assisted prediction and optimization of mechanical properties for laser powder bed fusion of Ti6Al4V alloy. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.10434110.1016/j.addma.2024.104341 ↗
39. Wang H, Li B, Zhang W, Xuan F (2024) Microstructural feature-driven machine learning for predicting mechanical tensile strength of laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additively manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy. Eng Fract Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10978810.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109788 ↗
40. Bhandari L, Gaur V (2022) A study on defect-induced fatigue failures in SLM Ti6Al4V alloy. Procedia Struct Integrity 42:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.12.06710.1016/j.prostr.2022.12.067 ↗
41. Liu J, Sun Q, Zhou C et al (2019) Achieving Ti6Al4V alloys with both high strength and ductility via selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng, A 766:138319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13831910.1016/j.msea.2019.138319 ↗
42. Sun W, Ma Y, Huang W et al (2020) Effects of build direction on tensile and fatigue performance of selective laser melting Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. Int J Fatigue 130:105260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10526010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105260 ↗
43. Xiao Z, Chen C, Hu Z et al (2020) Effect of rescanning cycles on the characteristics of selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V. Opt Laser Technol 122:105890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.10589010.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105890 ↗
44. Chang K, Liang E, Huang W et al (2020) Microstructural feature and mechanical property in different building directions of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy. Mater Lett 267:127516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12751610.1016/j.matlet.2020.127516 ↗
45. Ren S, Chen Y, Liu T, Qu X (2019) Effect of build orientation on mechanical properties and microstructure of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by selective laser melting. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 50:4388–4409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05322-w10.1007/s11661-019-05322-w ↗
46. Gong H, Dilip JJS, Yang L et al (2017) Influence of small particles inclusion on selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V powder. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 272:012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/272/1/01202410.1088/1757-899X/272/1/012024 ↗
47. Jamshidi P, Aristizabal M, Kong W et al (2020) Selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V: the impact of post-processing on the tensile, fatigue and biological properties for medical implant applications. Materials 13:2813. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1312281310.3390/ma13122813 ↗
48. Mahmud A, Huynh T, Zhou L et al (2021) Mechanical behavior assessment of Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion. Metals 11:1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1111167110.3390/met11111671 ↗
49. Qiu C, Adkins NJE, Attallah MM (2013) Microstructure and tensile properties of selectively laser-melted and of HIPed laser-melted Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng A 578:230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.09910.1016/j.msea.2013.04.099 ↗
50. Li C-L, Hong J-K, Narayana PL et al (2021) Realizing superior ductility of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V through a multi-step heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng, A 799:140367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.14036710.1016/j.msea.2020.140367 ↗
51. Xu W, Lui EW, Pateras A et al (2017) In situ tailoring microstructure in additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V for superior mechanical performance. Acta Mater 125:390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.02710.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.027 ↗
52. Hartunian P, Eshraghi M (2018) Effect of build orientation on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser-melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Manuf Mater Process 2:69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp204006910.3390/jmmp2040069 ↗
53. Cao S, Chu R, Zhou X et al (2018) Role of martensite decomposition in tensile properties of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. J Alloys Compd 744:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.11110.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.111 ↗
54. Yang X, Li Y, Duan M et al (2022) An investigation of ductile fracture behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. J Alloys Compd 890:161926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16192610.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161926 ↗
55. He Y, Ma Y, Zhang W, Wang Z (2022) Anisotropic tensile and fatigue properties of laser powder bed fusion Ti6Al4V under high temperature. Eng Fract Mech 276:108948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10894810.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108948 ↗
56. Peña-Parás L, Rodríguez-Villalobos M, Maldonado-Cortés D et al (2025) Optimization of milling process of AISI 4340 steel for enhanced tool life and surface quality using response surface methodology and bayesian technique. Results Eng 26:105097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10509710.1016/j.rineng.2025.105097 ↗
57. Shen T, Zhang W, Li B (2023) Machine learning-enabled predictions of as-built relative density and high-cycle fatigue life of Ti6Al4V alloy additively manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10728610.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107286 ↗
58. Park H-J, Kim J-S, Nam BW, Kim J-S (2024) ANN-based prediction models for green water events around a FPSO in irregular waves. Ocean Eng 291:116408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.11640810.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116408 ↗
59. Uz MM, Hazar Yoruç AB, Cokgunlu O et al (2022) A comparative study on phenomenological and artificial neural network models for high temperature flow behavior prediction in Ti6Al4V alloy. Mater Today Commun 33:104933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10493310.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104933 ↗
60. Voisin T, Calta NP, Khairallah SA et al (2018) Defects-dictated tensile properties of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Des 158:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.00410.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.004 ↗
61. Liu Y, Wang F, Xu D et al (2023) Microstructure and mechanical properties of laser metal deposited Ti6Al4V alloy with near equiaxed ß grain structure. J Mater Res Technol 22:1935–1947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.06810.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.068 ↗
62. Eyzat Y, Chemkhi M, Portella Q, et al (2019) Characterization and mechanical properties of As-Built SLM Ti-6Al-4V subjected to surface mechanical post-treatment. In: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp 1225–122910.1016/j.procir.2019.03.298 ↗
63. Xiao Z, Chen C, Hu Z et al (2020) Effect of rescanning cycles on the characteristics of selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V. Opt Laser Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.10589010.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105890 ↗
64. Vrancken B, Thijs L, Kruth J-P, Van Humbeeck J (2012) Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting: microstructure and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd 541:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.02210.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.022 ↗
65. Milton S, Rigo O, LeCorre S et al (2021) Microstructure effects on the machinability behaviour of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting and electron beam melting process. Mater Sci Eng A 823:141773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14177310.1016/j.msea.2021.141773 ↗
66. Maitra V, Shi J (2023) Predictability assessment of as-built hardness of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated via laser powder bed fusion. Manuf Lett 35:785–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.11310.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.113 ↗
67. Sarker A, Tran N, Rifai A et al (2019) Rational design of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V implants to control Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Materialia 5:100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10025010.1016/j.mtla.2019.100250 ↗
68. Xu W, Brandt M, Sun S et al (2015) Additive manufacturing of strong and ductile Ti-6Al-4V by selective laser melting via in situ martensite decomposition. Acta Mater 85:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.02810.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.028 ↗
69. Zhou B, Zhou J, Li H, Lin F (2018) A study of the microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V fabricated by SLM under vacuum. Mater Sci Eng A 724:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.03.02110.1016/j.msea.2018.03.021 ↗
70. Galindo-Fernández MA, Mumtaz K, Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo PEJ et al (2018) A microstructure sensitive model for deformation of Ti-6Al-4V describing cast-and-wrought and additive manufacturing morphologies. Mater Des 160:350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.02810.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.028 ↗
71. Ge J, Huang J, Lei Y et al (2020) Microstructural features and compressive properties of SLM Ti6Al4V lattice structures. Surf Coat Technol 403:126419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12641910.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126419 ↗
72. Kurdi A, Basak AK (2021) Micro-mechanical behaviour of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V under compression. Mater Sci Eng A 826:141975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14197510.1016/j.msea.2021.141975 ↗