The role of CSL boundaries for the creep ductility of copper canisters for spent nuclear fuel
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The microstructure, grain size and grain boundary (GB) structure of copper in canisters for encapsulation of spent nuclear fuel have been characterized. Coincident site lattice (CSL) GBs were found to be more common than random high angle GBs. Apart from Σ3, the Σ9 and Σ27 GBs show a higher frequency of occurrence than the other CSL GBs. This effect is more pronounced for the material in the canister lid that is slightly deformed. The high fraction of CSL boundaries of 60–65% is of the same order as for grain boundary engineered material. One critical property for the canister is the creep ductility that is improved by the addition of phosphorus (P) to the copper (Cu-OFP). The structure and segregation energies for P onto CSL boundaries have been determined with quantum mechanical calculations. In comparison to a previous study where literature data for the frequency of occurrence of CSL GBs was used, the absolute values of the segregation energies and the occupancy of P at GBs are significantly increased when using data for the canister copper. The presence of P reduces the amount of creep cavitation, which controls the ductility during brittle creep rupture. The creation of cavities and creep ductility are predicted. The computed creep ductility is slightly higher than in a previous study mainly due to the frequent occurrence of the Σ9 GB, which leads to strong segregation of P. The influence of grain size on the creep ductility has also been analysed. A large reduction in ductility with grain size is found for Cu without P which agrees with observations. For Cu-OFP a reduction in creep ductility for grain sizes up to 300 µm is also predicted, but no further reduction is obtained for still larger grain sizes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Sutton AP, Balluffi RW (1996) Interfaces in crystalline materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford
2. Randle V (2010) Grain boundary engineering: an overview after 25 years. Mater Sci Technol 26:253–26110.1179/026708309X12601952777747 ↗
3. Sandstrom R, Andersson HCM (2008) The effect of phosphorus on creep in copper. J Nucl Mater 372:66–7510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.02.004 ↗
4. Sandstrom R, Andersson HCM (2008) Creep in phosphorus alloyed copper during power-law breakdown. J Nucl Mater 372:76–8810.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.02.005 ↗
5. Sandström R, Wu R (2013) Influence of phosphorus on the creep ductility of copper. J Nucl Mater 441:364–37110.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.020 ↗
6. Sandström R, Wu R, Hagström J (2016) Grain boundary sliding in copper and its relation to cavity formation during creep. Mater Sci Eng A 651:259–26810.1016/j.msea.2015.10.100 ↗
7. Lousada CM, Korzhavyi PA (2022) Single vacancies at Σ5, Σ9 and Σ11 grain boundaries of copper and the geometrical factors that affect their site preference. J Phys Chem Solids 169:110833–11084010.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110833 ↗
8. Sandström R, Lousada CM (2020) The role of binding energies for phosphorus and sulphur at grain boundaries in copper. J Nucl Mater 544:152682–15269110.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152682 ↗
9. Randle V (2004) Twinning-related grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater 52:4067–408110.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.031 ↗
10. Randle V, Buschow KHJ, Cahn RW, Flemings MC, Ilschner B, Kramer EJ, Mahajan S, Veyssière P (2005) Grain boundary engineering, in Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–810.1016/B0-08-043152-6/02035-0 ↗
11. Michiuchi M, Kokawa H, Wang ZJ, Sato YS, Sakai K (2006) Twin-induced grain boundary engineering for 316 austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater 54:5179–518410.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.030 ↗
12. Tan L, Sridharan K, Allen TR, Nanstad RK, McClintock DA (2008) Microstructure tailoring for property improvements by grain boundary engineering. J Nucl Mater 374:270–28010.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.08.015 ↗
13. Reed BW, Kumar M, Minich RW, Rudd RE (2008) Fracture roughness scaling and its correlation with grain boundary network structure. Acta Mater 56:3278–328910.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.019 ↗
14. Tan L, Sridharan K, Allen TR (2007) Effect of thermomechanical processing on grain boundary character distribution of a Ni-based superalloy. J Nucl Mater 371:171–17510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.002 ↗
15. Bechtle S, Kumar M, Somerday BP, Launey ME, Ritchie RO (2009) Grain-boundary engineering markedly reduces susceptibility to intergranular hydrogen embrittlement in metallic materials. Acta Mater 57:4148–415710.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.012 ↗
16. Coleman M, Randle V (2008) Changes in interface parameters and tensile properties in copper as a consequence of iterative processing. Metall Mater Trans A 39:2175–218310.1007/s11661-008-9574-6 ↗
17. Lee DS, Ryoo HS, Hwang SK (2003) A grain boundary engineering approach to promote special boundaries in Pb-base alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 354:106–11110.1016/S0921-5093(02)00919-X ↗
18. Kumar M, Schwartz AJ, King WE (2002) Microstructural evolution during grain boundary engineering of low to medium stacking fault energy fcc materials. Acta Mater 50:2599–261210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00090-3 ↗
19. Yang X, Wang P, Huang M (2022) Grain boundary evolution during low-strain grain boundary engineering achieved by strain-induced boundary migration in pure copper. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14253210.1016/j.msea.2021.142532 ↗
20. Randle V, Owen G (2006) Mechanisms of grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater 54:1777–178310.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.046 ↗
21. Randle V (1999) Mechanism of twinning-induced grain boundary engineering in low stacking-fault energy materials. Acta Mater 47:4187–419610.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3 ↗
22. Hagström J (2023) Microstructure, crystallography and CSL grain boundaries in copper canisters for nuclear waste disposal, SKB TR-23-12, Swedish nuclear waste management company
23. Lousada CM, Korzhavyi PA (2020) Segregation of P and S impurities to A Σ9 grain boundary in Cu. Metals 10:1–810.3390/met10101362 ↗
24. Lousada CM, Korzhavyi PA (2024) Segregation of P and S to frequently occurring grain boundaries of Cu: single atoms and cooperative effects. J Phys Chem Solids 193:112124–11213510.1016/j.jpcs.2024.112124 ↗
25. Lousada CM, Korzhavyi PA (2023) Pathways of hydrogen atom diffusion at fcc Cu: Σ9 and Σ5 grain boundaries vs single crystal. J Mater Sci 44:17004–1701810.1007/s10853-023-09032-y ↗
26. Randle V (2001) The coincidence site lattice and the ‘sigma enigma.’ Mater Charact 47:411–41610.1016/S1044-5803(02)00193-6 ↗
27. Fortes MA (1972) Coincidence site lattices. physica status solidi (b) 54:311–31910.1002/pssb.2220540131 ↗
28. Luo Y-R, Luo Y-R (2007) Comprehensive handbook of chemical bond energies. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420007282 ↗
29. Mishin OV, Gertsman VY, Gottstein G (1997) Distributions of orientations and misorientations in hot-rolled copper. Mater Charact 38:39–4810.1016/S1044-5803(96)00130-1 ↗
30. Li Y, Korzhavyi PA, Sandström R, Lilja C (2017) Impurity effects on the grain boundary cohesion in copper. Phys Rev Mater 1:070602-1–070602-510.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.070602 ↗
31. Wu R, Pettersson N, Martinsson Å, Sandström R (2014) Cell structure in cold worked and creep deformed phosphorus alloyed copper. Mater Charact 90:21–3010.1016/j.matchar.2014.01.007 ↗
32. Henderson PJ, Sandstrom R (1998) Low temperature creep ductility of OFHC copper. Mater Sci Eng A 246:143–15010.1016/S0921-5093(97)00750-8 ↗
33. Rosborg B, Werme L (2008) The Swedish nuclear waste program and the long-term corrosion behaviour of copper. J Nucl Mater 379:142–15310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.025 ↗
34. Lim LC (1987) Cavity nucleation at high temperatures involving pile-ups of grain boundary dislocations. Acta Metall 35:1663–167310.1016/0001-6160(87)90114-3 ↗
35. He J-J, Sandström R, Lü S-R, Korzhavyi P, Zhang J, Qin H-Y, Liu J-B (2025) Predicting grain boundary sliding in metallic materials. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2025.12071810.1016/j.actamat.2025.120718 ↗
36. Sandström R (2024) Cavitation. In: Basic modeling and theory of creep of metallic alloys. Springer Series in Materials Science, p. 185–20310.1007/978-3-031-49507-6_10 ↗
37. Sandstrom R (2012) Basic model for primary and secondary creep in copper. Acta Mater 60:314–32210.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.052 ↗
38. Sandström R (2023) Primary creep at low stresses in copper. Mater Sci Eng A 873:144950–14495810.1016/j.msea.2023.144950 ↗
39. Fleck RG, Cocks GJ, Taplin DMR (1970) The influence of polycrystal grain size upon the creep ductility of copper. Metall Trans 1:3415–342010.1007/BF03037873 ↗
40. Liu T, Xia S, Du D, Bai Q, Zhang L, Lu Y (2019) Grain boundary engineering of large-size 316 stainless steel via warm-rolling for improving resistance to intergranular attack. Mater Lett 234:201–20410.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.111 ↗
41. Souaï N, Bozzolo N, Nazé L, Chastel Y, Logé R (2010) About the possibility of grain boundary engineering via hot-working in a nickel-base superalloy. Scripta Mater 62:851–85410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.02.019 ↗