Research progress on 3D printed geopolymer concrete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Pegna J (1997) Exploratory investigation of solid freeform construction. Autom Constr 5:427–43710.1016/S0926-5805(96)00166-5 ↗
2. S. Lim, R. Buswell, T. Le, R. Wackrow, S. Austin, A. Gibb, T. Thorpe, Development of a Viable Concrete Printing Process, in: Seoul, Korea, 201110.22260/ISARC2011/0124 ↗
3. Bos F, Wolfs R, Ahmed Z, Salet T (2016) Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys Prototyping 11:209–22510.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 ↗
4. Sanjayan JG, Nematollahi B, Xia M, Marchment T (2018) Effect of surface moisture on inter-layer strength of 3D printed concrete. Constr Build Mater 172:468–47510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.232 ↗
5. Han Y, Yang Z, Ding T, Xiao J (2021) Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete. J Clean Prod 278:12388410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884 ↗
6. Cicione A, Kruger J, Walls RS, Van Zijl G (2021) An experimental study of the behavior of 3D printed concrete at elevated temperatures. Fire Saf J 120:10307510.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103075 ↗
7. Zhang Z, Yang F, Liu J-C, Wang S (2020) Eco-friendly high strength, high ductility engineered cementitious composites (ECC) with substitution of fly ash by rice husk ash. Cem Concr Res 137:10620010.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106200 ↗
8. Luukkonen T, Abdollahnejad Z, Yliniemi J, Kinnunen P, Illikainen M (2018) One-part alkali-activated materials: a review. Cem Concr Res 103:21–3410.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.001 ↗
9. Brun F, Gaspar F, Mateus A, Vitorino J, Diz F (2020) Experimental Study on 3D Printing of Concrete with Overhangs. In: Bos FP, Lucas SS, Wolfs RJM, Salet TAM (eds) Second RILEM Int. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Conf. Concr. Digit. Fabr., pp 778–789
10. Liu Z, Li M, Weng Y, Wong TN, Tan MJ (2019) Mixture design approach to optimize the rheological properties of the material used in 3D cementitious material printing. Constr Build Mater 198:245–25510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.252 ↗
11. Guo X, Yang J, Xiong G (2020) Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on rheological properties of 3D printed fly ash based geopolymer. Cem Concr Compos 114:10382010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103820 ↗
12. Panda B, Paul SC, Hui LJ, Tay YWD, Tan MJ (2017) Additive manufacturing of geopolymer for sustainable built environment. J Clean Prod 167:281–28810.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.165 ↗
13. Panda B, Unluer C, Tan MJ (2018) Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3D printing. Cem Concr Compos 94:307–31410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.10.002 ↗
14. Bong SH, Xia M, Nematollahi B, Shi C (2021) Ambient temperature cured ‘just-add- water’ geopolymer for 3D concrete printing applications. Cem Concr Compos 121:10406010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104060 ↗
15. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ, Rangan BV (2004) On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Acids Mater J 101:467–472
16. D. Hardjito, B.V. Rangan, Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Res Rep. GC (2005) 94.10.1080/13287982.2005.11464946 ↗
17. Ranjbar N, Kuenzel C, Spangenberg J, Mehrali M (2020) Hardening evolution of geopolymers from setting to equilibrium: a review. Cem Concr Compos 114:10372910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103729 ↗
18. Nawaz M, Heitor A, Sivakumar M (2020) Geopolymers in construction - recent developments. Constr Build Mater 260:12047210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120472 ↗
19. Gholampour A, Ozbakkaloglu T, Ng CT (2019) Ambient- and oven-cured geopolymer concretes under active confinement. Constr Build Mater 228:11672210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116722 ↗
20. Phoo-Ngernkham T, Maegawa A, Mishima N, Hatanaka S, Chindaprasirt P (2015) Effects of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions on compressive and shear bond strengths of FA-GBFS geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 91:1–810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.001 ↗
21. Aupoil J, Champenois JB, de d’Espinose Lacaillerie JB, Poulesquen A (2019) Interplay between silicate and hydroxide ions during geopolymerization. Cem Concr Res 115:426–43210.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.012 ↗
22. Vinai R, Soutsos M (2019) Production of sodium silicate powder from waste glass cullet for alkali activation of alternative binders. Cem Concr Res 116:45–5610.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.008 ↗
23. Hu W, Nie Q, Huang B, Su A, Du Y, Shu X et al (2018) Mechanical property and microstructure characteristics of geopolymer stabilized aggregate base. Constr Build Mater 191:1120–112710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.081 ↗
24. Nie Q, Hu W, Ai T, Huang B, Shu X, He Q (2016) Strength properties of geopolymers derived from original and desulfurized red mud cured at ambient temperature. Constr Build Mater 125:905–91110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.144 ↗
25. van Deventer JSJ, Provis JL, Duxson P, Lukey GC (2007) Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products. J Hazard Mater 139:506–51310.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.044 ↗
26. Zuhua Z, Xiao Y, Huajun Z, Yue C (2009) Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer. Appl Clay Sci 43(2):218–22310.1016/j.clay.2008.09.003 ↗
27. Wang H, Li H, Yan F (2005) Synthesis and mechanical properties of metakaolinite- based geopolymer. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 268(1):1–610.1016/0927-7757(95)03490-0 ↗
28. Weng L, Sagoe-Crentsil K (2007) Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: Part I—Low Si/Al ratio systems. J mater sci 42(9):2997–300610.1007/s10853-006-0820-2 ↗
29. Ranjbar N, Mehrali M, Kuenzel C, Gundlach C, Pedersen DB, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Spangenberg J (2021) Rheological characterization of 3D printable geopolymers. Cem Concr Res 147:10649810.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106498 ↗
30. Antonić T, Čizmek A, Kosanović C, Subotić B (1993) Dissolution of amorphous aluminosilicate zeolite precursors in alkaline solutions. Part 1. —kinetics of the dissolution. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 89:1817–182210.1039/FT9938901817 ↗
31. Rattanasak U, Chindaprasirt P (2009) Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis of fly ash geopolymer. Miner Eng 22(12):1073–107810.1016/j.mineng.2009.03.022 ↗
32. J. Davidovits, Properties of Geopolymer Cements, First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev State Technical University, Scientific Research Institute on, Ukraine, 1994, pp. 131–149.
33. Hajimohammadi A, Provis JL, Van Deventer JS (2010) Effect of alumina release rate on the mechanism of geopolymer gel formation. Chem Mater 22(18):5199–520810.1021/cm101151n ↗
34. Görhan G, Kürklü G (2014) The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures. Compos Part B Eng 58:371–37710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082 ↗
35. Najafi Kani E, Allahverdi A (2009) Effects of curing time and temperature on strength development of inorganic polymeric binder based on natural pozzolan. J Mater Sci 44:3088–309710.1007/s10853-009-3411-1 ↗
36. Panda B, Singh GB, Unluer C, Tan MJ (2019) Synthesis and characterization of one-part geopolymers for extrusion based 3D concrete printing. J Clean Prod 220:610–61910.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.185 ↗
37. Muthukrishnan S, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2022) Set on demand geopolymer using print head mixing for 3D concrete printing. Cem Concr Compos 128:10445110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104451 ↗
38. Chen Y, Xia K, Jia Z, Gao Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Y (2024) Extending applicability of 3D-printable geopolymer to large-scale printing scenario via combination of sodium carbonate and nano-silica. Cem Concr Compos 145:10532210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105322 ↗
39. Güllü H, Cevik A, Al-Ezzi KMA, Gülsan ME (2019) On the rheology of using geopolymer for grouting: a comparative study with cement-based grout included fly ash and cold bonded fly ash. Constr Build Mater 196:594–61010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.140 ↗
40. Al-Qutaifi S, Nazari A, Bagheri A (2018) Mechanical properties of layered geopolymer structures applicable in concrete 3D-printing. Constr Build Mater 176:690–69910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.195 ↗
41. Panda B, Ruan S, Unluer C, Tan MJ (2020) Investigation of the properties of alkali-activated slag mixes involving the use of nano-clay and nucleation seeds for 3D printing. Compos Part B Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10782610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107826 ↗
42. Muthukrishnan S, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2021) Effect of alkali reactions on the rheology of one-part 3D printable geopolymer concrete. Cem Concr Compos. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10389910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103899 ↗
43. Chougan M, Ghaffar SH, Jahanzat M, Albar A, Mujaddedi N, Swash R (2020) The influence of nano-additives in strengthening mechanical performance of 3D printed multi-binder geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater 250:11892810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118928 ↗
44. Muthukrishnan S, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2023) Rapid early age strength development of in-line activated geopolymer for concrete 3D printing. Constr Build Mater 406:13331210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133312 ↗
45. Li Z, Wang L, Ma G (2020) Mechanical improvement of continuous steel microcable reinforced geopolymer composites for 3D printing subjected to different loading conditions. Compos Part B Eng 187:10779610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107796 ↗
46. Muthukrishnan S, Ramakrishnan S, Sanjayan J (2020) Effect of microwave heating on interlayer bonding and buildability of geopolymer 3D concrete printing. Constr Build Mater 265:12078610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120786 ↗
47. Tramontin Souza M, Simão L, Guzi De Moraes E, Senff L, De Castro Pessôa JR, Ribeiro MJ, Novaes De Oliveira AP (2021) Role of temperature in 3D printed geopolymers: evaluating rheology and buildability. Mater Lett 293:12968010.1016/j.matlet.2021.129680 ↗
48. Ma G, Yan Y, Zhang M, Sanjayan J (2022) Effect of steel slag on 3D concrete printing of geopolymer with quaternary binders. Ceram Int 48:26233–2624710.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.305 ↗
49. Panda B, Tan MJ (2018) Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing. Ceram Int 44(9):10258–1026510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031 ↗
50. Panda B (2019) N.A. Noor Mohamed, Y.W.D. Tay, M.J. Tan, Bond strength in 3D printed geopolymer mortar. In: Wangler T, Flatt RJ (eds) First RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication – Digital Concrete 2018. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 200–20610.1007/978-3-319-99519-9_18 ↗
51. Zhang D-W, Wang D, Lin X-Q, Zhang T (2018) The study of the structure rebuilding and yield stress of 3D printing geopolymer pastes. Constr Build Mater 184:575–58010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.233 ↗
52. Sun C, Xiang J, Xu M, He Y, Tong Z, Cui X (2020) 3D extrusion free forming of geopolymer composites: materials modification and processing optimization. J Clean Prod 258:12098610.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120986 ↗
53. Alrefaei Y, Wang Y-S, Dai J-G (2021) Effect of mixing method on the performance of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes along with polycarboxylate admixture. Cem Concr Compos 117:10391710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103917 ↗
54. Mechtcherine V, Nerella VN, Will F, Näther M, Otto J, Krause M (2019) Large-scale digital concrete construction – CONprint3D concept for on-site, monolithic 3d-printing. Autom Constr 107:10293310.1016/j.autcon.2019.102933 ↗
55. Kawashima S, Wang K, Ferron RD, Kim JH, Tregger N, Shah S (2021) A review of the effect of nanoclays on the fresh and hardened properties of cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res 147:10650210.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106502 ↗
56. Lim JH, Panda B, Pham Q-C (2018) Improving flexural characteristics of 3D printed geopolymer composites with in-process steel cable reinforcement. Constr Build Mater 178:32–4110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.010 ↗
57. Panda B, Chandra Paul S, Jen Tan M (2017) Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material. Mater Lett 209:146–14910.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.123 ↗
58. Ma G, Li Z, Wang L, Bai G (2019) Micro-cable reinforced geopolymer composite for extrusion-based 3D printing. Mater Lett 235:144–14710.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.159 ↗
59. Bong SH, Nematollahi B, Nazari A, Xia M, Sanjayan J (2019) Method of optimisation for ambient temperature cured sustainable geopolymers for 3D printing construction applications. Materials 12:90210.3390/ma12060902 ↗
60. Khan MS, Sanchez F, Zhou H (2020) 3-D printing of concrete: beyond horizons. Cem Concr Res 133:10607010.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106070 ↗
61. Mechtcherine V, Bos FP, Perrot A, da Silva WRL, Nerella VN, Fataei S, Wolfs RJM, Sonebi M, Roussel N (2020) Extrusion-based additive manufacturing with cement-based materials – production steps, processes, and their underlying physics: a review. Cem Concr Res 132:10603710.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106037 ↗
62. Li VC, Bos FP, Yu K, McGee W, Ng TY, Figueiredo SC, Nefs K, Mechtcherine V, Nerella VN, Pan J, van Zijl GPAG, Kruger PJ (2020) On the emergence of 3D printable engineered, strain hardening cementitious composites (ECC/SHCC). Cem Concr Res 132:10603810.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106038 ↗
63. Panda B, Paul SC, Mohamed NAN, Tay YWD, Tan MJ (2018) Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar. Measurement 113:108–11610.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.051 ↗
64. Lu B, Weng Y, Li M, Qian Y, Leong KF, Tan MJ, Qian S (2019) A systematical review of 3D printable cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater 207:477–49010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.144 ↗
65. Wang L, Ma G, Liu T, Buswell R, Li Z (2021) Interlayer reinforcement of 3D printed concrete by the in-process deposition of U-nails. Cem Concr Res 148:10653510.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106535 ↗
66. Mahmood AH, Foster SJ, Castel A (2021) Effects of mixing duration on engineering properties of geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 303:12444910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124449 ↗
67. Palacios M, Puertas F (2011) Effectiveness of mixing time on hardened properties of waterglass-activated slag pastes and mortars. ACI Mater J 108:73
68. Puertas F, González-Fonteboa B, González-Taboada I, Alonso MM, Torres-Carrasco M, Rojo G, Martínez-Abella F (2018) Alkali-activated slag concrete: fresh and hardened behaviour. Cem Concr Compos 85:22–3110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.10.003 ↗
69. Jolin M., Burns D., Bissonnette B., Gagnon F., Bolduc L.-S. Understanding the pumpability of concrete. Shotcrete Undergr Support XI Eng Conf Int. (2009) 193–207.
70. Ricciotti L, Apicella A, Perrotta V, Aversa R (2023) Geopolymer materials for extrusion-based 3D-printing: a review. Polymers 15:468810.3390/polym15244688 ↗
71. Rahul AV, Santhanam M, Meena H, Ghani Z (2019) 3D printable concrete: mixture design and test methods. Cem Concr Compos 97:13–2310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.014 ↗
72. Mechtcherine V, Nerella VN, Kasten K (2014) Testing pumpability of concrete using sliding pipe rheometer. Constr Build Mater 53:312–32310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.037 ↗
73. Lu C, Zhang Z, Shi C, Li N, Jiao D, Yuan Q (2021) Rheology of alkali-activated materials: a review. Cem Concr Compos 121:10406110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104061 ↗
74. Jayathilakage JR, Rajeev P, Sanjayan JG (2020) Yield stress criteria to assess the buildability of 3D concrete printing. Constr Build Mater 240:11798910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117989 ↗
75. Jayathilakage R, Sanjayan J, Rajeev P (2019) Direct shear test for the assessment of rheological parameters of concrete for 3D printing applications. Mater Struct 52:1210.1617/s11527-019-1322-4 ↗
76. Jayathilakage RI, Rajeev P, Sanjayan J (2020) Predication of Strength-Based Failure in Extrusion-Based 3D Concrete Printing. In: Mechtcherine V, Khayat K, Secrieru E (eds) Rheol. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Process. Constr. Mater., pp 391–399
77. Yuan Q, Li Z, Zhou D, Huang T, Huang H, Jiao D, Shi C (2019) A feasible method for measuring the buildability of fresh 3D printing mortar. Constr Build Mater 227:11660010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.326 ↗
78. D. Hardjito, M. Tsen, Strength and Thermal Stability of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar, The 3rd International Conference-ACF/VCA, 2008, pp. 144–150.
79. Freundlich H, Juliusburger F (1935) Thixotropy, influenced by the orientation of anisometric particles in sols and suspensions. Trans Faraday Soc 31:920–92110.1039/tf9353100920 ↗
80. Mewis J, Wagner NJ (2009) Thixotropy. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 147–148:214–22710.1016/j.cis.2008.09.005 ↗
81. Alghamdi H, Nair SAO, Neithalath N (2019) Insights into material design, extrusion rheology, and properties of 3D-printable alkali-activated fly ash-based binders. Mater Des 167:10763410.1016/j.matdes.2019.107634 ↗
82. Guo S, Ma C, Long G, Xie Y (2019) Cleaner one-part geopolymer prepared by introducing fly ash sinking spherical beads: properties and geopolymerization mechanism. J Clean Prod 219:686–69710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.116 ↗
83. Dey D, Srinivas D, Panda B, Suraneni P, Sitharam TG (2022) Use of industrial waste materials for 3D printing of sustainable concrete: a review. J Clean Prod 340:13074910.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130749 ↗
84. Bhattacherjee S, Basavaraj AS, Rahul AV, Santhanam M, Gettu R, Panda B, Schlangen E, Chen Y, Copuroglu O, Ma G, Wang L, Basit Beigh MA, Mechtcherine V (2021) Sustainable materials for 3d concrete printing. Cem Concr Compos 122:10415610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104156 ↗
85. Yu J, Yao J, Lin X, Li H, Lam JYK, Leung CKY, Sham IML, Shih K (2018) Tensile performance of sustainable strain-hardening cementitious composites with hybrid PVA and recycled PET fibers. Cem Concr Res 107:110–12310.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.013 ↗
86. Yang T, Zhu H, Zhang Z, Gao X, Zhang C, Wu Q (2018) Effect of fly ash microsphere on the rheology and microstructure of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes. Cem Concr Res 109:198–20710.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.008 ↗
87. Panda B, Unluer C, Tan MJ (2019) Extrusion and rheology characterization of geopolymer nanocomposites used in 3D printing. Compos Part B Eng 176:10729010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290 ↗
88. Bhowmick A, Ghosh S (2012) Effect of synthesizing parameters on workability and compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Int J Civ Struct Eng 3:168–177
89. A. Lampropoulos, A. Cundy, Effect of alkaline activator, water, superplasticiser and slag contents on the compressive strength and workability of slag-fly ash based geopolymer mortar cured under Ambient Temperature, (2016).
90. Lee NK, Lee HK (2013) Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/ slag concrete manufactured at room temperature. Constr Build Mater 47:1201–120910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.107 ↗
91. Ismail I, Bernal SA, Provis JL, San Nicolas R, Hamdan S, van Deventer JSJ (2014) Modification of phase evolution in alkali-activated blast furnace slag by the incorporation of fly ash. Cem Concr Compos 45:125–13510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.006 ↗
92. Grosseau P, Pourchez J, Guyonnet R (2007) HEC influence on cement hydration measured by conductometry. Cem Concr Res 36:1777–1780
93. Zhang C, Nerella VN, Krishna A, Wang S, Zhang Y, Mechtcherine V, Banthia N (2021) Mix design concepts for 3D printable concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos 122:10415510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104155 ↗
94. Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, Buswell RA, Gibb AGF, Thorpe T (2012) Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater Struct 45:1221–123210.1617/s11527-012-9828-z ↗
95. Malaeb Z, Hachem H, Tourbah A, Maalouf T, Zarwi N, Hamzeh F (2015) 3D concrete printing: machine and mix design. Int J Civ Eng 6:14–22
96. V.N. Nerella, V. Mechtcherine, Studying the printability of fresh concrete for formwork-free concrete onsite 3D printing technology (CONPrint3D), in: J.G. Sanjayan, A. Nazari, B. Nematollahi (Eds.), 3D Concrete Printing Technology, Butterworth-Heinemann2019, pp. 333–347.10.1016/B978-0-12-815481-6.00016-6 ↗
97. Xiao J, Ji G, Zhang Y, Ma G, Mechtcherine V, Pan J, Wang L, Ding T, Duan Z, Du S (2021) Large-scale 3d printing concrete technology: current status and future opportunities. Cem Concr Compos 122:10411510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104115 ↗
98. Gosselin C, Duballet R, Roux Ph, Gaudillière N, Dirrenberger J, Morel Ph (2016) Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete – a new processing route for architects and builders. Mater Des 100:102–10910.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097 ↗
99. Chen Y, Zhang Y, Pang B, Liu Z, Liu G (2021) Extrusion-based 3D printing concrete with coarse aggregate: printability and direction-dependent mechanical performance. Constr Build Mater 296:12362410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123624 ↗
100. Cui H, Yu S, Cao X, Yang H (2022) Evaluation of printability and thermal properties of 3D printed concrete mixed with phase change materials. Energies 15:197810.3390/en15061978 ↗