Review: Recent progress in titanium alloys development via machine learning and high-throughput preparation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Hu M, Tan Q, Knibbe R et al (2023) Recent applications of machine learning in alloy design: a review. Mater Sci Eng R 155:10074610.1016/j.mser.2023.100746 ↗
2. Olson GB (2000) Designing a new material world. Science 288:993–99810.1126/science.288.5468.993 ↗
3. Yartys VA, Lototskyy MV, Akiba E et al (2019) Magnesium based materials for hydrogen based energy storage: past, present and future. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:7809–785910.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.212 ↗
4. Jiao Z, Liu H, Dong Y et al (2025) Self-generating hierarchical lubricious phase for superior high-temperature tribological performance in multi-principal element alloys. Scr Mater 268:11684310.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.116843 ↗
5. Xie M, Ye W, Zhou Q et al (2025) A novel cocrni-based medium-entropy alloy self-lubricating composite with superior wear performance. Rare Met 44:2011–202610.1007/s12598-024-03067-z ↗
6. Zhao H, Zhao C, Xie W et al (2023) Research progress of laser cladding on the surface of titanium and its alloys. Materials 16:325010.3390/ma16083250 ↗
7. Li Y, Fang H, Chen R et al (2023) Optimization of (α + β) microstructure and trade-off between strength and toughness: Based on Mo[eq] and d electron theory in β-Ti alloy. Mater Des 231:11202210.1016/j.matdes.2023.112022 ↗
8. Gorynin IV (1999) Titanium alloys for marine application. Mater Sci Eng A 263:112–11610.1016/S0921-5093(98)01180-0 ↗
9. Zhao Q, Sun Q, Xin S et al (2022) High-strength titanium alloys for aerospace engineering applications: a review on melting-forging process. Mater Sci Eng A 845:14326010.1016/j.msea.2022.143260 ↗
10. Li L, Li MQ, Luo J (2015) Mechanism in the β phase evolution during hot deformation of Ti-5Al-2Sn-2Zr-4Mo-4Cr with a transformed microstructure. Acta Mater 94:36–4510.1016/j.actamat.2015.04.045 ↗
11. Tan C, Deng C, Li S et al (2022) Mechanical property and biological behaviour of additive manufactured TiNi functionally graded lattice structure. Int J Extreme Manuf 4(4):4500310.1088/2631-7990/ac94fa ↗
12. Zhang T, Liu C (2022) Design of titanium alloys by additive manufacturing: a critical review. Adv Powder Mater 1:10001410.1016/j.apmate.2021.11.001 ↗
13. Tan C, Li S, Essa K et al (2019) Laser powder bed fusion of Ti-rich TiNi lattice structures: process optimisation, geometrical integrity, and phase transformations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 141:19–2910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.04.002 ↗
14. Sun FJ, Qu SG, Deng ZH et al (2017) Shear band formation and wear mechanism of titanium alloy powder metallurgy material prepared by HIP using Ti-6Al-4V pre-alloy powder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:4439–444510.1007/s00170-017-1008-4 ↗
15. You D, Jiang X, Cheng X et al (2017) Bayesian kriging modeling for spatiotemporal prediction in squeeze casting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:355–36910.1007/s00170-016-9078-2 ↗
16. Hua D, Zhou Q, Shi Y et al (2023) Revealing the deformation mechanisms of <110> symmetric tilt grain boundaries in CoCrNi medium-entropy alloy. Int J Plast 171:10383210.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103832 ↗
17. Schleder GR, Padilha ACM, Acosta CM et al (2019) From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review. J Phys Mater 2:3200110.1088/2515-7639/ab084b ↗
18. Menon D, Ranganathan R (2022) A generative approach to materials discovery, design, and optimization. ACS Omega 7:25958–2597310.1021/acsomega.2c03264 ↗
19. Liu Y, Niu C, Wang Z et al (2020) Machine learning in materials genome initiative: a review. J Mater Sci Technol 57:113–12210.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.067 ↗
20. Wang Y, Jiao Z, Shi Y et al (2025) Investigation on the wear performance of CoCrNi matrix self-lubricating composites at cryogenic temperature. Surf Coat Technol 500:13190610.1016/j.surfcoat.2025.131906 ↗
21. Liu X, Xu P, Zhao J et al (2022) Material machine learning for alloys: applications, challenges and perspectives. J Alloy Compd 921:16598410.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165984 ↗
22. Juan Y, Dai Y, Yang Y et al (2021) Accelerating materials discovery using machine learning. J Mater Sci Technol 79:178–19010.1016/j.jmst.2020.12.010 ↗
23. Hart GLW, Mueller T, Toher C et al (2021) Machine learning for alloys. Nat Rev Mater 6:730–75510.1038/s41578-021-00340-w ↗
24. Rajendra P, Girisha A, Gunavardhana Naidu T et al (2022) Advancement of machine learning in materials science. Mater Today Proc 62:5503–550710.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.238 ↗
25. Liu Y, Zhao T, Ju W et al (2017) Materials discovery and design using machine learning. J Materiomics 3:159–17710.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.002 ↗
26. Fang S, Xiao X, Xia L et al (2003) Relationship between the widths of supercooled liquid regions and bond parameters of Mg-based bulk metallic glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids 321:120–12510.1016/S0022-3093(03)00155-8 ↗
27. Ward L, O’Keeffe SC, Stevick J et al (2018) A machine learning approach for engineering bulk metallic glass alloys. Acta Mater 159:102–11110.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.002 ↗
28. Brown P, Zhuang H (2023) Quantum machine-learning phase prediction of high-entropy alloys. Mater Today 63:18–3110.1016/j.mattod.2023.02.014 ↗
29. Pei Z, Yin J, Hawk JA et al (2020) Machine-learning informed prediction of high-entropy solid solution formation: beyond the hume-rothery rules. npj Comput Mater 6(1): 50.10.1038/s41524-020-0308-7 ↗
30. Rao Z, Tung PY, Xie R et al (2022) Machine learning-enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science 378:78–8510.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
31. Li Z, Nash WT, O’Brien SP et al (2022) A generative adversarial network model for design and discovery of multi principal element alloys. J Mater Sci Technol 125:81–9610.1016/j.jmst.2022.03.008 ↗
32. Li J, Xie B, Fang Q et al (2021) High-throughput simulation combined machine learning search for optimum elemental composition in medium entropy alloy. J Mater Sci Technol 68:70–7510.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.008 ↗
33. Wang C, Fu H, Jiang L et al (2019) A property-oriented design strategy for high performance copper alloys via machine learning. npj Comput Mater 5(1): 1–8.10.1038/s41524-019-0227-7 ↗
34. Jiang L, Wang C, Fu H et al (2022) Discovery of aluminum alloys with ultra-strength and high-toughness via a property-oriented design strategy. J Mater Sci Technol 98:33–4310.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.011 ↗
35. Feng X, Wang Z, Jiang L et al (2023) Simultaneous enhancement in mechanical and corrosion properties of Al-Mg-Si alloys using machine learning. J Mater Sci Technol 167:1–1310.1016/j.jmst.2023.04.072 ↗
36. Guan B, Chen C, Xin Y et al (2024) Predicting the Hall-Petch slope of magnesium alloys by machine learning. J Magnes Alloy 12:4436–444210.1016/j.jma.2023.07.005 ↗
37. Ghorbani M, Boley M, Nakashima PNH et al (2023) A machine learning approach for accelerated design of magnesium alloys. Part A: Alloy data and property space. J Magnes Alloy 11:3620–363310.1016/j.jma.2023.09.035 ↗
38. Ghorbani M, Boley M, Nakashima PNH et al (2023) A machine learning approach for accelerated design of magnesium alloys. Part B: Regression and property prediction. J Magnes Alloy 11:4197–420510.1016/j.jma.2023.09.010 ↗
39. Suh JS, Suh B, Lee SE et al (2022) Quantitative analysis of mechanical properties associated with aging treatment and microstructure in Mg-Al-Zn alloys through machine learning. J Mater Sci Technol 107:52–6310.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.045 ↗
40. Chen Y, Wang S, Xiong J et al (2023) Identifying facile material descriptors for charpy impact toughness in low-alloy steel via machine learning. J Mater Sci Technol 132:213–22210.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.051 ↗
41. Geng X, Mao X, Wu H et al (2022) A hybrid machine learning model for predicting continuous cooling transformation diagrams in welding heat-affected zone of low alloy steels. J Mater Sci Technol 107:207–21510.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.038 ↗
42. Lu Z, Ma D, Liu X et al (2024) High-throughput and data-driven machine learning techniques for discovering high-entropy alloys. Commun Mater 5:7610.1038/s43246-024-00487-3 ↗
43. Huang E, Lee W, Singh SS et al (2022) Machine-learning and high-throughput studies for high-entropy materials. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 147:10064510.1016/j.mser.2021.100645 ↗
44. Qin Z, Wang Z, Wang Y et al (2021) Phase prediction of Ni-base superalloys via high-throughput experiments and machine learning. Mater Res Lett 9:32–4010.1080/21663831.2020.1815093 ↗
45. Zhuang X, Antonov S, Li W et al (2023) Alloying effects and effective alloy design of high-Cr CoNi-based superalloys via a high-throughput experiments and machine learning framework. Acta Mater 243:11852510.1016/j.actamat.2022.118525 ↗
46. Zhang F, Huang K, Zhao K et al (2023) Directed energy deposition combining high-throughput technology and machine learning to investigate the composition-microstructure-mechanical property relationships in titanium alloys. J Mater Process Technol 311:11780010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117800 ↗
47. Zhu C, Li C, Wu D et al (2021) A titanium alloys design method based on high-throughput experiments and machine learning. J Mater Res Technol 11:2336–235310.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.055 ↗
48. Sui S, Chew Y, Hao Z et al (2022) Effect of cyclic heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of laser aided additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo alloy. Adv Powder Mater 1:10000210.1016/j.apmate.2021.09.002 ↗
49. Zhang J, Song B, Cai C et al (2022) Tailorable microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted TiB/Ti-6Al-4V composite by heat treatment. Adv Powder Mater 1:10001010.1016/j.apmate.2021.10.001 ↗
50. Butler KT, Davies DW, Cartwright H et al (2018) Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559:547–55510.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
51. Domingos P (2012) A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun ACM 55:78–8710.1145/2347736.2347755 ↗
52. Raschka S (2020) Model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection in machine learning. Cornell University Library, arXiv.org, Ithaca, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1811.12808.10.48550/arxiv.1811.12808 ↗
53. Zou C, Li J, Wang W et al (2021) Integrating data mining and machine learning to discover high-strength ductile titanium alloys. Acta Mater 202:211–22110.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.056 ↗
54. Huang G, Guo Y, Chen Y et al (2023) Application of machine learning in material synthesis and property prediction. Materials 16:597710.3390/ma16175977 ↗
55. Yin J, Rao Z, Wu D et al (2024) Interpretable predicting creep rupture life of superalloys: enhanced by domain-specific knowledge. Adv Sci 11:230798210.1002/advs.202307982 ↗
56. Lee K, Ayyasamy MV, Delsa P et al (2022) Phase classification of multi-principal element alloys via interpretable machine learning. npj Comput Mater 8:2510.1038/s41524-022-00704-y ↗
57. Niu Y, Hong Z, Wang Y et al (2023) Machine learning-based beta transus temperature prediction for titanium alloys. J Mater Res Technol 23:515–52910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.019 ↗
58. Ridzuan F, Wan Zainon WMN (2019) A review on data cleansing methods for big data. Procedia Comput Sci 161:731–73810.1016/j.procs.2019.11.177 ↗
59. Konovalenko I, Maruschak P, Prentkovskis O et al (2018) Investigation of the rupture surface of the titanium alloy using convolutional neural networks. Materials 11:246710.3390/ma11122467 ↗
60. Verdonck T, Baesens B, óskarsdóttir M et al (2024) Special issue on feature engineering editorial. Mach Learn 113(7):3917–392810.1007/s10994-021-06042-2 ↗
61. Xue D, Xue D, Yuan R et al (2017) An informatics approach to transformation temperatures of NiTi-based shape memory alloys. Acta Mater 125:532–54110.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.009 ↗
62. Zhang H, Fu H, He X et al (2020) Dramatically enhanced combination of ultimate tensile strength and electric conductivity of alloys via machine learning screening. Acta Mater 200:803–81010.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.068 ↗
63. Gewers FL, Ferreira GR, Arruda HFD et al (2022) Principal component analysis. ACM Comput Surv 54:1–3410.1145/3447755 ↗
64. Sun Y, Zeng W, Zhao Y et al (2012) Modeling the correlation of composition-processing-property for TC11 titanium alloy based on principal component analysis and artificial neural network. J Mater Eng Perform 21:2231–223710.1007/s11665-012-0162-y ↗
65. Greener JG, Kandathil SM, Moffat L et al (2022) A guide to machine learning for biologists. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 23:40–5510.1038/s41580-021-00407-0 ↗
66. Priya KS (2021) Linear regression algorithm in machine learning through matlab. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 9:989–99510.22214/ijraset.2021.39410 ↗
67. Tang Y, Wan Y, Wang Z et al (2022) Machine learning and python assisted design and verification of Fe–based amorphous/nanocrystalline alloy. Mater Des 219:11072610.1016/j.matdes.2022.110726 ↗
68. Zou H, Tian Y, Zhang L et al (2024) Integrating machine learning and calphad method for exploring low-modulus near-β-Ti alloys. Rare Met 43:309–32310.1007/s12598-023-02333-w ↗
69. Ebrahimi M, Mohammadi-Dehcheshmeh M, Ebrahimie E et al (2019) Comprehensive analysis of machine learning models for prediction of sub-clinical mastitis: Deep learning and gradient-boosted trees outperform other models. Comput Biol Med 114:10345610.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103456 ↗
70. Kang J, Niu Y, Zhou Y et al (2023) Wear resistance prediction of AlCoCrFeNi-x (Ti, Cu) high-entropy alloy coatings based on machine learning. Metals 13:93910.3390/met13050939 ↗
71. Xu M, Watanachaturaporn P, Varshney PK et al (2005) Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data. Remote Sens Environ 97:322–33610.1016/j.rse.2005.05.008 ↗
72. Sudrajat R, Irianingsih I, Krisnawan D (2017) Analysis of data mining classification by comparison of C4.5 and ID algorithms. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 166:1203110.1088/1757-899X/166/1/012031 ↗
73. Myles AJ, Feudale RN, Liu Y et al (2004) An introduction to decision tree modeling. J Chemom 18:275–28510.1002/cem.873 ↗
74. Yu J, Zhang D, Li H et al (2020) Detection of internal holes in additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V part using laser ultrasonic testing. Appl Sci 10:36510.3390/app10010365 ↗
75. Douard A, Grandvallet C, Pourroy F et al (2018) An example of machine learning applied in additive manufacturing, IEEE 1746–1750.10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607275 ↗
76. Khanzadeh M, Chowdhury S, Marufuzzaman M et al (2018) Porosity prediction: Supervised-learning of thermal history for direct laser deposition. J Manuf Syst 47:69–8210.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.001 ↗
77. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–3210.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
78. Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhang J (2012) New machine learning algorithm: Random forest. Inf Comput Appl 7473:246–252
79. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–14010.1023/A:1018054314350 ↗
80. Ziegler A, König IR (2014) Mining data with random forests: current options for real-world applications. Wires Data Min Knowl Discov 4:55–6310.1002/widm.1114 ↗
81. Gong H, Fan Q, Zhang H et al (2024) Data-driven mapping-relationship mining between hardness and mechanical properties of dual-phase titanium alloys via random forest and statistical analysis. Rare Met 43:829–84110.1007/s12598-023-02445-3 ↗
82. Zhang W, Li P, Wang L et al (2024) Prediction of the yield strength of as-cast alloys using the random forest algorithm. Mater Today Commun 38:10852010.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108520 ↗
83. Smola AJ, Schölkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14:199–22210.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
84. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–29710.1023/A:1022627411411 ↗
85. Battineni G, Chintalapudi N, Amenta F (2019) Machine learning in medicine: performance calculation of dementia prediction by support vector machines (SVM). IMU 16:100200
86. Yan C, Shen X, Guo F (2018) An improved support vector regression using least squares method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57:2431–244510.1007/s00158-017-1871-5 ↗
87. Fan W, Si F, Ren S et al (2019) Integration of continuous restricted Boltzmann machine and SVR in NOx emissions prediction of a tangential firing boiler. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 195:10387010.1016/j.chemolab.2019.103870 ↗
88. Chen D, Liu Y, Feng W et al (2021) In-situ prediction of α-phase volume fraction in titanium alloy using laser ultrasonic with support vector regression. Appl Acoust 177:10792810.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107928 ↗
89. Crick F (1989) The recent excitement about neural networks. Nature 337:129–13210.1038/337129a0 ↗
90. Wu Y, Feng J (2018) Development and application of artificial neural network. Wirel Pers Commun 102:1645–165610.1007/s11277-017-5224-x ↗
91. Durodola JF (2022) Machine learning for design, phase transformation and mechanical properties of alloys. Prog Mater Sci 123:10079710.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100797 ↗
92. Ding S, Li H, Su C et al (2013) Evolutionary artificial neural networks: a review. Artif Intell Rev 39:251–26010.1007/s10462-011-9270-6 ↗
93. Bataineh M, Marler T (2017) Neural network for regression problems with reduced training sets. Neural Netw 95:1–910.1016/j.neunet.2017.07.018 ↗
94. Oh JM, Narayana PL, Hong J et al (2021) Property optimization of TRIP Ti alloys based on artificial neural network. J Alloy Compd 884:16102910.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161029 ↗
95. Sun Y, Zeng W, Han Y et al (2011) Optimization of chemical composition for TC11 titanium alloy based on artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Comput Mater Sci 50:1064–106910.1016/j.commatsci.2010.11.002 ↗
96. Zhang P (1993) Model selection via multifold cross validation. Ann Statist 21:299–31310.1214/aos/1176349027 ↗
97. Arlot S, Celisse A (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statist Surv 4:40–7910.1214/09-SS054 ↗
98. Cheng J, Dekkers JCM, Fernando RL (2021) Cross-validation of best linear unbiased predictions of breeding values using an efficient leave-one-out strategy. J Anim Breed Genet 138:519–52710.1111/jbg.12545 ↗
99. Tao Q, Xu P, Li M et al (2021) Machine learning for perovskite materials design and discovery. npj Comput Mater 7:3134.10.1038/s41524-021-00495-8 ↗
100. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statist Sci 1:54–75