Feasibility study of gypsum as an electrode binder for building structural batteries: hydration process, electrochemical and mechanical properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Singh VP, Kumar M, Srivastava RS et al (2021) Thermoelectric energy harvesting using cement-based composites: a review. Mater Today Energy 21:100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2021.10071410.1016/j.mtener.2021.100714 ↗
2. Salami BA, Oyehan TA, Tanimu A et al (2022) Cement-based batteries design and performance: a review. Environ Chem Lett 20(3):1671–1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01389-x10.1007/s10311-022-01389-x ↗
3. Fang C, Zhang D (2021) Portland cement electrolyte for structural supercapacitor in building application. Constr Build Mater 285:122897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12289710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122897 ↗
4. Brzezińska D (2018) Ventilation system influence on hydrogen explosion hazards in industrial lead-acid battery rooms. Energies 11(8):2086. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1108208610.3390/en11082086 ↗
5. An Z, Shi T, Du X et al (2024) Experimental study on the internal short circuit and failure mechanism of lithium-ion batteries under mechanical abuse conditions. J Energy Storage 89:111819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.11181910.1016/j.est.2024.111819 ↗
6. Ma J, Huang P, Bai Z (2024) Numerical study on the critical characteristics of internal short-circuit hot spot in lithium-ion batteries. Process Saf Environ 185:1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.00510.1016/j.psep.2024.04.005 ↗
7. Xiao J, Li J, Xu Z (2020) Challenges to future development of spent lithium ion batteries recovery from environmental and technological perspectives. Environ Sci Technol 54(1):9–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b0372510.1021/acs.est.9b03725 ↗
8. Chen Y, Dou A, Zhang Y (2021) A review of recycling status of decommissioned lithium batteries. Front Mater 8:634667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.63466710.3389/fmats.2021.634667 ↗
9. Wu Y, Zhong L (2023) An integrated energy analysis framework for evaluating the application of hydrogen-based energy storage systems in achieving net zero energy buildings and cities in Canada. Energ Convers Manag 286:117066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.11706610.1016/j.enconman.2023.117066 ↗
10. Liu K, Tian J, Chen J et al (2022) Low-Carbon retrofitting path of existing public buildings: a comparative study based on green building rating systems. Energies 15(22):8724. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1522872410.3390/en15228724 ↗
11. Ma MinDa MMD, Cai WeiGuang CWG, Wu Yong WY (2019) China act on the energy efficiency of civil buildings (2008): a decade review. Sci Total Environ 651(P1):42–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.11810.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.118 ↗
12. Ji X, Pan T, Fu C et al (2024) Hydration, microstructure and mechanical properties of cement-based materials with heat-modified autoclaved aerated concrete waste. Constr Build Mater 419:135482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13548210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135482 ↗
13. Meng Q, Chung DDL (2010) Battery in the form of a cement-matrix composite. Cement Concrete Comp 32(10):829–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.08.00910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.08.009 ↗
14. Byrne A, Holmes N, Norton B (2015) Cement based batteries and their potential for use in low power operations. Mat Sci Eng r 96(1):012073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/96/1/01207310.1088/1757-899X/96/1/012073 ↗
15. Zhang EQ, Tang L (2021) Rechargeable concrete battery. Buildings 11(3):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings1103010310.3390/buildings11030103 ↗
16. Li T, Tier L (2023) Review of research on conductive cement-based material. Adv Eng Forum 50:31–38. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-vsgE2c10.4028/p-vsgE2c ↗
17. Sanjuán MÁ, Estévez E, Argiz C (2019) Alkali ion concentration estimations in cement paste pore solutions. APPS 9(5):992. https://doi.org/10.3390/app905099210.3390/app9050992 ↗
18. Pan JW, Feng YT, Wang JT et al (2012) Modeling of alkali-silica reaction in concrete: a review. Front Struct Civ Eng 6:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-012-0141-210.1007/s11709-012-0141-2 ↗
19. Plusquellec G, Nonat A (2016) Interactions between calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) and calcium chloride, bromide and nitrate. Cement Concr Res 90:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.002 ↗
20. Elakneswaran Y, Nawa T, Kurumisawa K (2009) Electrokinetic potential of hydrated cement in relation to adsorption of chlorides. Cement Concr Res 39(4):340–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.006 ↗
21. Lee JH, Kim HH, Kim GS et al (2010) Evaluation of surface acid and base properties of LiFePO4 in aqueous medium with pH and its electrochemical properties. J Phys Chem C 114(10):4466–4472. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp908555210.1021/jp9085552 ↗
22. Mao L, Li L, Kim B (2022) Modelling of multi-species transport in concrete under the action of external electric field: Influence of the overpotential at electrode–electrolyte interfaces. J Electroanal Chem 907:116079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.11607910.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116079 ↗
23. Bakshi P, Pappu A, Bharti DK (2025) Life cycle assessment for calcination process of flue gas desulfurization gypsum and transformation into β-CaSO4·0.5 H2O. Sustain Chem Environ 9:100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scenv.2025.10021410.1016/j.scenv.2025.100214 ↗
24. Prakasan S, Palaniappan S, Gettu R (2020) Study of energy use and CO2 emissions in the manufacturing of clinker and cement. J Inst Eng (India) Ser A 101:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-019-00409-410.1007/s40030-019-00409-4 ↗
25. Ding X, Huang W, Li Y et al (2023) Study on retarding feature and retardation mechanism of various retarding materials on gypsum as a construction material: a review. J Build Eng 72:106569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10656910.1016/j.jobe.2023.106569 ↗
26. Kai R, Na C, Shuyuan Z et al (2021) Low-carbon sustainable composites from waste phosphogypsum and their environmental impacts. Crystals 11(7):719–719. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1107071910.3390/cryst11070719 ↗
27. Krejsová J, Schneiderová Heralová R, Doleželová M et al (2019) Environmentally friendly lightweight gypsum-based materials with waste stone dust. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part l J Mater Des Appl 233(3):258–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071982616310.1177/1464420719826163 ↗
28. Singh NB, Middendorf B (2007) Calcium sulphate hemihydrate hydration leading to gypsum crystallization. Prog Cryst Growth Ch 53(1):57–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.01.00210.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.01.002 ↗
29. Mokaripoor E, Kazeminezhad I, Daneshtalab R (2024) Improving the electrochemical properties of LTO/rGO nanocomposite using PVDF: PMMA as a binary composite binder in Li-ion batteries. J Energy Storage 84:110812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.11081210.1016/j.est.2024.110812 ↗
30. Seo SB, Song Y, Choi YR et al (2024) Double-walled carbon nanotubes as effective conducting agents for lithium iron phosphate cathodes. Carbon 218:118731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11873110.1016/j.carbon.2023.118731 ↗
31. Cheng L, Sun Q (2017) Discharge capacity estimation for lithium-ion battery packs with cells in parallel connection based on current prediction of in-pack cells. Energ Technol 5(8):1250–1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20160054910.1002/ente.201600549 ↗
32. Zheng Y, Ouyang M, Lu L et al (2015) Understanding aging mechanisms in lithium-ion battery packs: From cell capacity loss to pack capacity evolution. J Power Sourc 278:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.105 ↗
33. Hsieh HW, Wang CH, Huang AF et al (2021) Green chemical delithiation of lithium iron phosphate for energy storage application. Chem Eng J 418:129191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.12919110.1016/j.cej.2021.129191 ↗
34. Lynge ME, van der Westen R, Postma A et al (2011) Polydopamine–a nature-inspired polymer coating for biomedical science. Nanoscale 3(12):4916–4928. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1NR10969C10.1039/C1NR10969C ↗
35. Celik-Kucuk A, Abe T (2023) Electrochemical properties and performance of a flexible polysiloxane-based ionic conductor as a binder for LiFePO4 cathode. J Power Sourc 581:233478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23347810.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233478 ↗
36. Cao S, Shi L, Miao M et al (2019) Solution-processed flexible paper-electrode for lithium-ion batteries based on MoS2 nanosheets exfoliated with cellulose nanofibrils. Electrochim Acta 298:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.06710.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.067 ↗
37. Gupta V, Alam F, Verma P et al (2021) Additive manufacturing enabled, microarchitected, hierarchically porous polylactic-acid/Lithium iron phosphate/carbon nanotube nanocomposite electrodes for high performance Li-Ion batteries. J Power Sourc 494:229625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22962510.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229625 ↗
38. Wolf A, Flegler A, Prieschl J et al (2021) Centrifugation based separation of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and carbon black for lithium-ion battery recycling. Chem Eng Process 160:108310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2021.10831010.1016/j.cep.2021.108310 ↗
39. Zhang S, Yuan W, Wang Y et al (2024) Early-stage lifetime prediction for lithium-ion batteries: linear regression-ensemble learning hybrid model based on impedance spectroscopy geometry. J Power Sourc 617:235153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23515310.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235153 ↗
40. Lee J, Park BN (2024) Inducing and understanding pseudocapacitive behavior in an electrophoretically deposited lithium iron phosphate li-metal battery as an electrochemical test platform. J Phys Chem Lett 15(27):7095–7102. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0171710.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01717 ↗
41. Zavalis TG, Klett M, Kjell MH et al (2013) Aging in lithium-ion batteries: model and experimental investigation of harvested LiFePO4 and mesocarbon microbead graphite electrodes. Electrochim Acta 110:335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.08110.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.081 ↗
42. Song Z, Hou J, Li X et al (2020) The sequential algorithm for combined state of charge and state of health estimation of lithium-ion battery based on active current injection. Energy 193:116732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.11673210.1016/j.energy.2019.116732 ↗
43. Watanabe Y, Ugata Y, Ueno K et al (2023) Does Li-ion transport occur rapidly in localized high-concentration electrolytes? Phys Chem Chem Phys 25(4):3092–3099. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP05319E10.1039/D2CP05319E ↗
44. Xu H, Ma K, Liu Z et al (2024) New insights into the growth characteristics and crystal morphology of α-hemihydrate gypsum induced by organic acid crystallization agents during PG conversion. Constr Build Mater 436:136898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13689810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136898 ↗
45. Rendel PM, Gavrieli I, Wolff-Boenisch D et al (2018) Towards establishing a combined rate law of nucleation and crystal growth–the case study of gypsum precipitation. J Cryst Growth 485:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.12.03710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.12.037 ↗
46. JC/T 698–2010, Gypsum block [S]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=YHRUfPYi6NPMHjrG0yQbhOe_ImAzEDmgcJkKDEQ-LYMZr2BCBqoTO-KnZ-RlwBT7Gkfu8chb3OvTrgJ-h43oNVlDP8jEJd2NMhfploV_Aknk91kupw6JcM30GnSMylEhuQImtrvMkk6N5h_xtqeS02GfORu6us_YvAcum-FZ5C-2S4g-UWkWOyppJPzgl1IH&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
47. JG/T 169–2016, General technical requarements of light weight panel used for building partition [S]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=YHRUfPYi6NP0e45N36z-9W8TCjxd-mq-U2Wo1VyDuL9jQfaS7NorBFqQIy-JO6BnQw4Vu0UhOlfAu2fTlDEPW4boHwzwFfiuPVN8kcXOPQxU5AP1YAF5UrX7iLuEp2Y-NWvKTmBLedNn1LbZ2GgpVgTLJnK6L1Q_WEyB_4m0rT5aUfecwW52kZtzLjpJvJ_x&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
48. JC/T 799–2007, Decorative gypsum board [S]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=YHRUfPYi6NPW6Yxeh3Kzn2w-fMVzcJ6kt3JCfM-PctIlmukokCQeKyHZOu63GBzjTUxNEWAwLTZ8dGZkkcGGkcloUAygcCVjpfpuSbmdHfotasGI_m8Q8jkJ0KEql-JUyuhfTxhZWrIavJhYVcwaH3raAxwhI6EsYwHP7TaRaxHreL7p0T3eS3NQp8HaSpf6&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
49. Yin L, Liu S, Yin D et al (2024) Development of rechargeable cement-based batteries with carbon fiber mesh for energy storage solutions. J Energy Storage 93:112181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.11218110.1016/j.est.2024.112181 ↗
50. Yao Y, Zhang Z, Liu H et al (2022) A new in-situ growth strategy to achieve high performance graphene-based cement material. Constr Build Mater 335:127451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12745110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127451 ↗
51. Prałat K, Brych-Dobrowolska M (2023) The influence of hydroxyethylmethyl cellulose on the heat released during the hydration of modified gypsum materials. J Mater Civ Eng 35(6):04023123. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1475710.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-14757 ↗
52. Bai Y, Lu Y, Zhang D (2023) Preparation of nano-carbon black and silica fume modified foam concrete: compressive strength, pore structure and electromagnetic property. Constr Build Mater 369:130553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13055310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130553 ↗
53. Ba H, Li J, Ni W et al (2023) Effect of calcium to silicon ratio on the microstructure of hydrated calcium silicate gels prepared under medium alkalinity. Constr Build Mater 379:131240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13124010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131240 ↗
54. Yin L, Liu S, Yin D et al (2024) Development of rechargeable cement-based batteries with carbon fiber mesh for energy storage solutions. J Energy Stor 93:112181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.11218110.1016/j.est.2024.112181 ↗
55. Jiang Y, Yue JL, Guo Q et al (2018) Highly porous Mn3O4 micro/nanocuboids with in situ coated carbon as advanced anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Small 14(19):1704296. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20170429610.1002/smll.201704296 ↗