Investigation of microstructural and magnetic property evolution in mechanically milled Co–Zr metallic ribbon
Source abstract
Abstract
Zr2Co11 has emerged as a promising candidate for rare-earth-free magnetic materials with the exceptional energy products in thin-film nanocomposites. Despite this, its potential in bulk magnet form remains largely unexplored. Powder metallurgy offers a promising route to fabricate these alloys in bulk magnet form with controlled microstructure and soft and hard magnetic phase distribution essential for optimizing magnetic properties. This study investigates the effects of mechanical milling on the microstructure, and magnetic properties of a metallic ribbon having composition of Co85Zr15, aiming toward development of novel permanent magnet material. The microstructure and phase composition of both the as-cast ribbon and the milled powder samples were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD). The as-cast ribbon predominantly consists of the hard magnetic Zr2Co11 phase along with a soft magnetic Zr6Co23 phase. TEM analysis confirmed that mechanical milling reduced the ribbon to fine particles with an average size of 11 nm after 14 h of milling. With the increase in milling duration, the saturation magnetization was found to increase whereas the coercivity was found to decreases. This study shows that milling has a significant impact on the exchange coupling between soft and hard magnetic phases at nanoscale. To rationalize the experimental observations, first-principles calculations were performed considering rhombohedral structure of Zr2Co11 to estimate the change in the total magnetic moments in the unit cell as a function of isotropic compression/expansion, as well as to examine the effect of off-stoichiometry and defect formation. The ball milling process parameters were optimized to achieve particle sizes close to the critical size of the soft and hard magnetic phases (~ 11 nm) required for effective magnetic coupling between the two so as to manifest the exchange spring behavior in nanocomposite magnets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Gutfleisch O, Willard MA, Brück E et al (2011) Magnetic materials and devices for the 21st century: stronger, lighter, and more energy efficient. Adv Mater 23:821–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.20100218010.1002/ADMA.201002180 ↗
2. Liu S, Kuhl GE (2000) Development of new high temperature and high performance permanent magnet materials. No. UDR-tr-2000-0009.10.21236/ADA382940 ↗
3. Cui J, Kramer M, Zhou L et al (2018) Current progress and future challenges in rare-earth-free permanent magnets. Acta Mater 158:118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2018.07.04910.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2018.07.049 ↗
4. Bauer D, Diamond D, Li J et al (2010) U.S. Department of Energy Critical Materials Strategy. https://doi.org/10.2172/100084610.2172/1000846 ↗
5. Minerals Information Center N MINERAL COMMODITY SUMMARIES 2017
6. MineralPrices.com. https://mineralprices.com/. Accessed 3 April 2025
7. Li D, Pan DS, Li SJ, Zhang ZD (2015) Recent developments of rare-earth-free hard-magnetic materials. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 59:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11433-015-5760-X10.1007/S11433-015-5760-X ↗
8. Park J, Hong Y-K, Haskew TA, et al (2016) Rare-earth free permanent magnets and permanent magnet synchronous motors. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Alabama. https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/2672
9. Niarchos D, Giannopoulos G, Gjoka M et al (2015) Toward rare-earth-free permanent magnets: a combinatorial approach exploiting the possibilities of modeling, shape anisotropy in elongated nanoparticles, and combinatorial thin-film approach. JOM 67:1318–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11837-015-1431-710.1007/S11837-015-1431-7 ↗
10. Ronning F, Bader S (2014) Rare earth replacement magnets. J Phys Condens Matter 26:060301. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/6/06030110.1088/0953-8984/26/6/060301 ↗
11. Sellmyer DJ, Balamurugan B, Zhang WY et al (2013) Advances in Rare-Earth-Free Permanent Magnets. In: Proceedings of the 8th Pacific rim international congress on advanced materials and processing, pp 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48764-9_21210.1007/978-3-319-48764-9_212 ↗
12. Yamamoto S, Gallage R, Ogata Y et al (2013) Quantitative understanding of thermal stability of α′′-Fe16N2. Chem Commun 49:7708–7710. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC43590C10.1039/C3CC43590C ↗
13. Balamurugan B, Das B, Zhang WY et al (2014) Hf–Co and Zr–Co alloys for rare-earth-free permanent magnets. J Phys Condens Matter 26:064204. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/6/06420410.1088/0953-8984/26/6/064204 ↗
14. Gabay AM, Zhang Y, Hadjipanayis GC (2001) Cobalt-rich magnetic phases in Zr–Co alloys. J Magn Magn Mater 236:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00446-210.1016/S0304-8853(01)00446-2 ↗
15. Zhao X, Nguyen MC, Zhang WY, et al (2014) Exploring the structural complexity of intermetallic compounds by an adaptive genetic algorithm. Phys Rev Lett 112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.112.04550210.1103/PHYSREVLETT.112.045502 ↗
16. Demczyk BG, Cheng SF (1991) Structures of Zr2Co11 and HfCo7 intermetallic compounds. J Appl Crystallogr 24:1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188989100733110.1107/S0021889891007331 ↗
17. Saito T (2003) Microstructures and magnetic properties of Co-Zr system alloys. Mater Trans 44:1713–1716. https://doi.org/10.2320/MATERTRANS.44.171310.2320/MATERTRANS.44.1713 ↗
18. Zhang WY, Li XZ, Valloppilly S et al (2013) Magnetism of rapidly quenched rhombohedral Zr2Co11-based nanocomposites. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:135004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/46/13/13500410.1088/0022-3727/46/13/135004 ↗
19. Ivanova GV, Shchegoleva NN, Gabay AM (2007) Crystal structure of Zr2Co11 hard magnetic compound. J Alloys Compd 432:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2006.05.12210.1016/J.JALLCOM.2006.05.122 ↗
20. Liu XJ, Zhang HH, Wang CP, Ishida K (2009) Experimental determination and thermodynamic assessment of the phase diagram in the Co–Zr system. J Alloys Compd 482:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2009.04.03210.1016/J.JALLCOM.2009.04.032 ↗
21. Okamoto H (2011) Co-Zr (cobalt-zirconium). J Phase Equilib Diffus 32:169–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11669-010-9838-X10.1007/S11669-010-9838-X ↗
22. Kneller EF, Hawig R (1991) The exchange-spring magnet: a new material principle for permanent magnets. IEEE Trans Magn 27:3588–3600. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.10293110.1109/20.102931 ↗
23. Martínez Sánchez H, Zamora Alfonso LE, Trujillo Hernandez JS, Pérez Alcázar GA (2019) Evidence of exchange coupling in τ-MnAlC/FeCo system. J Magn Magn Mater 473:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMMM.2018.10.06910.1016/J.JMMM.2018.10.069 ↗
24. Bajorek A, Łopadczak P, Prusik K, Zubko M (2021) Correlation between Microstructure and Magnetism in Ball-Milled SmCo5/?-Fe (5%wt. ?-Fe) Nanocomposite Magnets. Materials 14:805. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA1404080510.3390/MA14040805 ↗
25. Zhang J, Takahashi YK, Gopalan R, Hono K (2005) Sm (Co,Cu)5/Fe exchange spring multilayer films with high energy product. Appl Phys Lett 86:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1889238/92980510.1063/1.1889238/929805 ↗
26. Ishrak F, Lastovich M, Malakar A et al (2024) Aluminum/SmCo5 composites for structural and magnetic applications. J Mater Sci 59:16981–16992. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-024-10208-310.1007/S10853-024-10208-3 ↗
27. Fan X, Jin Q, Yang Z et al (2025) High permeability and low magnetic loss of Fe–Si/BN soft magnetic composites with layered structure. J Mater Sci 60(9):8015–8025. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-025-10937-Z10.1007/S10853-025-10937-Z ↗
28. Huang TX, Yan Q, Chen FG et al (2024) Reducing the annealing heating rate sensitivity of Fe83.5Si3B10P2Cu1.5 soft magnetic nanocrystalline alloy by adjusting the melt spinning cooling rate. J Mater Sci 59:19707–19715. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-024-10333-Z10.1007/S10853-024-10333-Z ↗
29. Pang N, Ye F, Jiang Y (2018) Cryogenic ball milling synthesis of L10-Mn55Ga45/FeCo composites with effective exchange coupling and enhanced maximum energy products. Mater Lett 231:167–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATLET.2018.08.03110.1016/J.MATLET.2018.08.031 ↗
30. Lu W, Niu J, Wang T et al (2016) Low-energy mechanically milled τ-phase MnAl alloys with high coercivity and magnetization. J Alloys Compd 675:163–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2016.03.09810.1016/J.JALLCOM.2016.03.098 ↗
31. An S, Li X, Li W et al (2021) Coercivity enhancement of SmCo/FeCo nanocomposite magnets by doping eutectic Sm-Zn alloy. Mater Lett 284:128965. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATLET.2020.12896510.1016/J.MATLET.2020.128965 ↗
32. Balasubramanian B, Das B, Skomski R et al (2013) Novel nanostructured rare-earth-free magnetic materials with high energy products. Adv Mater 25:6090–6093. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.20130270410.1002/ADMA.201302704 ↗
33. Gutfleisch O (2000) Controlling the properties of high energy density permanent magneticmaterials by different processing routes. J Phys D Appl Phys 33:R157. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/33/17/20110.1088/0022-3727/33/17/201 ↗
34. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
35. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
36. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
37. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
38. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
39. Juhás P, Davis T, Farrow CL, Billinge SJL (2013) PDFgetX3: a rapid and highly automatable program for processing powder diffraction data into total scattering pair distribution functions. J Appl Crystallogr 46:560–566. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188981300519010.1107/S0021889813005190 ↗
40. Ramezani M, Neitzert T (2012) Mechanical milling of aluminum powder using planetary ball milling process. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 55:790–798
41. Suryanarayana C (2004). Mechanical alloying and milling. Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/978020302064710.1201/9780203020647 ↗
42. Shen Y, Huang MQ, Turgut Z, et al (2012) Effect of milling time on magnetic properties and structures of bulk Sm-Co/α-(Fe, Co) nanocomposite magnets. J Appl Phys 111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3673413/37085410.1063/1.3673413/370854 ↗
43. Burzo E, Grössinger R, Hundegger P et al (1991) Magnetic properties of ZrCo5.1−xFex alloys. J Appl Phys 70:6550–6552. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34990410.1063/1.349904 ↗
44. Zhao X, Ke L, Nguyen MC, et al (2015) Structures and magnetic properties of Co-Zr-B magnets studied by first-principles calculations. J Appl Phys 117. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922984/14008624/243902_1_ACCEPTED_MANUSCRIPT.PDF10.1063/1.4922984/14008624/243902_1_ACCEPTED_MANUSCRIPT.PDF ↗
45. Oraon A, Adhikary T, Das GP et al (2022) Combined experimental and DFT studies of Co82Zr12V6-xBx melt-spun ribbons to investigate structure and magnetic properties. J Magn Magn Mater 547:168940. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMMM.2021.16894010.1016/J.JMMM.2021.168940 ↗
46. Shokrollahi H (2009) The magnetic and structural properties of the most important alloys of iron produced by mechanical alloying. Mater Des 30:3374–3387. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2009.03.03510.1016/J.MATDES.2009.03.035 ↗
47. Jin YL, Zhang WY, Skomski R, et al (2014) Phase composition and nanostructure of Zr2Co11-based alloys. J Appl Phys 115. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4867226/95434910.1063/1.4867226/954349 ↗