Exploring three-point bending response of novel aluminum foam sandwich beams fabricated by melt route
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Palomba G, Epasto G, Crupi V (2022) Lightweight sandwich structures for marine applications: a review. Mech Adv Mater Struct 29:4839–4864. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.194144810.1080/15376494.2021.1941448 ↗
2. Ma Q, Rejab MRM, Siregar JP, Guan Z (2021) A review of the recent trends on core structures and impact response of sandwich panels. J Compos Mater 55:2513–2555. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199832199073410.1177/0021998321990734 ↗
3. Wang E, Yao R, Li Q, Hu X, Sun G (2024) Lightweight metallic cellular materials: A systematic review on mechanical characteristics and engineering applications. Int J Mech Sci 270:108795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10879510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108795 ↗
4. Baroutaji A, Sajjia M, Olabi A-G (2017) On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: Recent advances and future developments. Thin-Walled Struct 118:137–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.05.01810.1016/j.tws.2017.05.018 ↗
5. Kabir K, Vodenitcharova T, Hoffman M (2014) Response of aluminium foam-cored sandwich panels to bending load. Compos Pt B Eng 64:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.003 ↗
6. Crupi V, Montanini R (2007) Aluminium foam sandwiches collapse modes under static and dynamic three-point bending. Int J Impact Eng 34:509–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.10.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.10.001 ↗
7. Latour M, D’Aniello M, Landolfo R, Rizzano G (2021) Experimental and numerical study of double-skin aluminium foam sandwich panels in bending. Thin-Walled Struct 164:107894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.10789410.1016/j.tws.2021.107894 ↗
8. Wang Z, Hong B, Xian G, Xin M, Huang S, Shen H (2024) Quasi-static and low-velocity impact behaviors of steel-aluminum foam sandwich beams. Structures 64:106549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10654910.1016/j.istruc.2024.106549 ↗
9. Zhang J, Huang W, Yuan H, Wu X (2023) Failure behavior of a sandwich beam with GLARE face-sheets and aluminum foam core under three-point bending. Thin-Walled Struct 183:110438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.11043810.1016/j.tws.2022.110438 ↗
10. Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Liu N et al (2023) Three-point bending performances of integral-forming aluminum foam sandwich. Mater Des 229:111889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11188910.1016/j.matdes.2023.111889 ↗
11. Latour M, Sato A, D’Aniello M, Landolfo R, Rizzano G (2025) Flexural response of metallurgically bonded steel-aluminium foam-steel panels and composite beam. Eng Struct 322:119114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11911410.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119114 ↗
12. Zu G, Song B, Zhong Z, Li X, Mu Y, Yao G (2012) Static three-point bending behavior of aluminum foam sandwich. J Alloys Compd 540:275–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.06.07910.1016/j.jallcom.2012.06.079 ↗
13. Li Z, Zheng Z, Yu J, Qian C, Lu F (2014) Deformation and failure mechanisms of sandwich beams under three-point bending at elevated temperatures. Compos Struct 111:285–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.005 ↗
14. Yang S, Luo H, Wang L, Mu Y, Wu L (2024) Effect of core structure on the quasi-static bending behaviors and failure mechanisms of aluminum foam sandwiches at elevated temperatures. Mater Charact 208:113638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2024.11363810.1016/j.matchar.2024.113638 ↗
15. Wang L, Luo H, Yang S, Cui S, Wu L (2024) Achieving metallurgical bonding in steel faceplate/aluminum foam sandwich via hot pressing and foaming processes: interfacial microstructure evolution and tensile behaviour. J Mater Process Technol 334:118636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2024.11863610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2024.118636 ↗
16. Ashby MF, Evans T, Fleck NA, Hutchinson J, Wadley H, Gibson L (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 42–54
17. Rakow JF, Waas AM (2005) Size effects and the shear response of aluminum foam. Mech Mater 37:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.12.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2003.12.002 ↗
18. Triawan F, Kishimoto K, Adachi T, Inaba K, Nakamura T, Hashimura T (2012) The elastic behavior of aluminum alloy foam under uniaxial loading and bending conditions. Acta Mater 60:3084–3093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.01310.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.013 ↗
19. Triawan F, Kishimoto K, Adachi T et al (2011) Elastic bending behavior of aluminum alloy foam. Proc Eng 10:2994–2999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.49610.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.496 ↗
20. Wang L, Luo H, Yang S, Wu L, Wu J (2023) Compressive behavior and energy absorption analysis of casting skin-wrapped aluminum foams. Mater. Today Commun 36:106839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10683910.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106839 ↗
21. Mu Y, Yao G, Liang L, Luo H, Zu G (2010) Deformation mechanisms of closed-cell aluminum foam in compression. Scr Mater 63:629–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.04110.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.041 ↗