Optimizing corrosion behaviours of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy through cold rolling and artificial ageing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Williams JC, Edgar AS (2003) Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems. Acta Mater 51:5775–5799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.02310.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.023 ↗
2. Tang J, Wang J, Teng J, Zeng RC (2021) Effect of Zn content on the dynamic softening of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys during hot compression deformation. Vacuum 184:109941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10994110.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109941 ↗
3. Zou Y, Wu XD, Tang SB, Zhu QQ, Song H, Cao LF (2020) Co-precipitation of T’ and η’ phase in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Mater Charact 169:110610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11061010.1016/j.matchar.2020.110610 ↗
4. Mei L, Chen XP, Wang C, Xie J, Liu Q (2021) Good combination of strength and corrosion resistance in an Al-Cu-Mg alloy processed by a short-cycled thermomechanical treatment. Mater Charact 181:111469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11146910.1016/j.matchar.2021.111469 ↗
5. Zuo JR, Hou LG, Shi JT, Cui H, Zhuang LZ, Zhang JS (2017) Enhanced plasticity and corrosion resistance of high strength Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy processed by an improved thermomechanical processing. J Alloys Compd 716:220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.04710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.047 ↗
6. Guo C, Zhang HT, Li SS, Chen RX, Nan YF, Li L, Wang P, Li BM et al (2021) Evolution of microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of Al–4Mg–2Zn–0.3Ag (wt%) alloy processed by T6 or thermomechanical treatment. Corro Sci 188:109551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.10955110.1016/j.corsci.2021.109551 ↗
7. Zou Y, Cao LF, Wu XD, Wang YC, Sun X, Song H, Couper MJ (2020) Effect of ageing temperature on microstructure, mechanical property and corrosion behavior of aluminum alloy 7085. J Alloys Compd 823:153792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15379210.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153792 ↗
8. Wang YC, Liu MW, Xiao WL, Zhao WT, Ma CL (2020) Effects of multi-stage aging treatments on the precipitation behavior and properties of 7136 aluminum alloy. J Alloys Compd 814:152256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15225610.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152256 ↗
9. Wang YC, Cao LF, Wu XD, Tong X, Liao B, Huang GJ, Wang ZA (2020) Effect of retrogression treatments on microstructure, hardness and corrosion behaviors of aluminum alloy 7085. J Alloys Compd 814:152264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15226410.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152264 ↗
10. Sun XY, Zhang B, Lin HQ, Zhou Y, Sun L, Wang JQ, Han EH, Ke W (2013) Correlations between stress corrosion cracking susceptibility and grain boundary microstructures for an Al–Zn–Mg alloy. Corros Sci 77:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.03210.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.032 ↗
11. Jiang L, Zhang ZH, Fu HD, Huang SY, Zhuang DW, Xie JX (2022) Corrosion behavior and mechanism of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy based on the characterization of the secondary phases. Mater Charact 189:111974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11197410.1016/j.matchar.2022.111974 ↗
12. Ren YF, Wan TJ, Xu YS, Zhang K, Zhang MY, Li JH (2024) Effects of stress aging treatment on the microstructure, mechanical properties and electrochemical corrosion behavior of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 997:174686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17468610.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174686 ↗
13. Zhang ZG, Ma XW, Zhang CS, Chu GN, Meng ZJ, Zhao GQ, Chen L (2022) Effect of stress-aging treatment on the mechanical and corrosion properties of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater Sci Eng 838:142791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14279110.1016/j.msea.2022.142791 ↗
14. Adrien J, Maire E, Estevez R, Ehrstrom JC, Warner T (2004) Influence of the thermomechanical treatment on the microplastic behaviour of a wrought Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Acta Mater 52:1653–1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.00910.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.009 ↗
15. Zhang M, Shuai GL, Wang YQ, Li Z, Zhang DT, Yu HZ, Li L (2022) Corrosion behaviors at different temperature based on the ultrafine-grained structure of Al–Fe alloy. Mater Lett 311:131508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13150810.1016/j.matlet.2021.131508 ↗
16. Chen Y, Tang YC, Zhang HA, Hu N, Gao N, Starink MJ (2019) Microstructures and hardness prediction of an ultrafine-grained Al-2024 Alloy. Metals 9:1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/met911118210.3390/met9111182 ↗
17. Williamson GK, Smallman RE (1956) III. Dislocation densities in some annealed and cold-worked metals from measurements on the X-ray debye-scherrer spectrum. Philos Mag 1:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643560823807410.1080/14786435608238074 ↗
18. Velázquez-Carrillo OA, García-Pastor FA (2021) Thermal stability of microstructure, mechanical properties, formability parameters and crystallographic texture in an Al-7075 alloy processed by accumulative roll bonding. J Mater Res Technol 11:2208–2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.04110.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.041 ↗
19. Fuster V, Druker AV, Baruj A, Malarría J, Bolmaro R (2015) Characterization of phases in an Fe–Mn–Si–Cr–Ni shape memory alloy processed by different thermomechanical methods. Mater Charact 109:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2015.09.02610.1016/j.matchar.2015.09.026 ↗
20. Ding LP, Zhao L, Weng YY, Schryvers D, Liu Q, Idrissi H (2021) Atomic-scale investigation of the heterogeneous precipitation in the E (Al18Mg3Cr2) dispersoid of 7075 aluminum alloy. J Alloys Compd 851:156890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15689010.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156890 ↗
21. Li XZ, Chen X, Zheng JX, Xu XS, Chen B (2024) Atomic-level characterization of η-twins with non-homogeneous nucleation on the E(Al18Mg3Cr2) phase in 7075 alloy: TEM observations and DFT calculations. J Alloys Compd 976:173148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17314810.1016/j.jallcom.2023.173148 ↗
22. Meyrick G, Powell GW (1973) Phase transformations in metals and alloys. Annu Rev Mater Sci 3:327–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.03.080173.00155110.1146/annurev.ms.03.080173.001551 ↗
23. Xiong YD, Robson JD, Yao YC, Zhong XL, Guarracino F, Bendo A, Jin ZL, Hashimoto T et al (2023) Effects of heat treatments on the microstructure and localized corrosion behaviors of AA7075 aluminum alloy. Corros Sci 221:111361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2023.11136110.1016/j.corsci.2023.111361 ↗
24. Garner A, Euesden R, Yao YC, Aboura Y, Zhao H, Donoghue J, Curioni M, Gault B et al (2021) Multiscale analysis of grain boundary microstructure in high strength 7xxx Al alloys. Acta Mater 202:190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.02110.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.021 ↗
25. Peng XY, Li Y, Xu GF, Huang JW, Yin ZM (2018) Effect of precipitate state on mechanical properties, corrosion behavior, and microstructures of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloy. Met Mater Int 24:1046–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-018-0057-z10.1007/s12540-018-0057-z ↗
26. Moghanni-Bavil-Olyaei H, Arjomandi J, Hosseini M (2017) Effects of gallium and lead on the electrochemical behavior of Al–Mg–Sn–Ga–Pb as anode of high rate discharge battery. J Alloys Compd 695:2637–2644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.17610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.176 ↗
27. McCafferty E (2005) Validation of corrosion rates measured by the Tafel extrapolation method. Corros Sci 47:3202–3215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.04610.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.046 ↗
28. Fu J, Cui K (2022) Effect of Mn content on the microstructure and corrosion resistance of Al–Cu–Mg–Mn alloys. J Alloys Compd 896:162903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16290310.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162903 ↗
29. Brunner JG, Birbilis N, Ralston KD, Virtanen S (2012) Impact of ultrafine-grained microstructure on the corrosion of aluminium alloy AA2024. Corros Sci 57:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.01610.1016/j.corsci.2011.12.016 ↗
30. Feng L, Pan QL, Wei LL, Huang ZQ, Liu ZM (2015) Through-thickness inhomogeneity of localized corrosion in 7050–T7451 Al alloy thick plate. J Cent South Univ 22:2423–2434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2769-210.1007/s11771-015-2769-2 ↗
31. Laxman Mani Kanta P, Srivastava PC, Venkateswarlu K, Paswan S, Mahato B, Das G, Sivaprasad K, Gopala Krishna K (2017) Corrosion behavior of ultrafine-grained AA2024 aluminum alloy produced by cryorolling. Int J Miner Metall Mater 24:1293–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-017-1522-210.1007/s12613-017-1522-2 ↗
32. Bonora PL, Andrei M, Eliezer A, Gutman EM (2002) Corrosion behaviour of stressed magnesium alloys. Corros Sci 44:729–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00101-910.1016/S0010-938X(01)00101-9 ↗
33. Guo C, Wang H, Guo YQ, Chen YF, Ke YJ, Zhang HT, Liu XG, Nagaumi H (2024) Regulating corrosion resistance of Al–4.5Mg–2.0Zn–0.3Ag alloy via non-isothermal ageing combined with cold rolling. Corros Sci 229:111878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2024.11187810.1016/j.corsci.2024.111878 ↗
34. Dos Santos SL, Antunes RA, Santos SF (2015) Influence of injection temperature and pressure on the microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of a AlSiCu alloy processed by HPDC. Mater Des 88:1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.09510.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.095 ↗
35. Li JF, Jia ZQ, Li CX, Birbilis N, Cai C (2009) Exfoliation corrosion of 7150 Al alloy with various tempers and its electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in EXCO solution. Mater Corros 60:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20080510210.1002/maco.200805102 ↗
36. Moreira AH, Benedetti AV, Sumodjo PTA, Garrido JA, Cabot PL (2002) Electrochemical behaviour of heat-treated Al–Zn–Mg alloys in chloride solutions containing sulphate. Electrochim Acta 47:2823–2831. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00169-X10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00169-X ↗
37. Liu Y, Wang Z, Ke W (2014) Study on influence of native oxide and corrosion products on atmospheric corrosion of pure Al. Corros Sci 80:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.11.02710.1016/j.corsci.2013.11.027 ↗
38. Xiong HQ, Zhou YX, Kong CL, Yu HL (2022) Effect of retrogression treatment with different heating rates on microstructure, strength and corrosion behaviors of 7050 alloy. Materials Charact 186:111819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11181910.1016/j.matchar.2022.111819 ↗
39. Tao JQ, Xiang L, Zhang YP et al (2022) Corrosion behavior and mechanical performance of 7085 aluminum alloy in a humid and hot marine atmosphere. Materials 15:7503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1521750310.3390/ma15217503 ↗
40. Zhao GY, Wen QH, Fang M, Xiao Z (2024) Effects of high temperature pre-precipitation on mechanical and corrosion behavior of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Alloy Compd 983:173738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17373810.1016/j.jallcom.2024.173738 ↗
41. Feng JQ, Wang YB, Tao FX, Li YK, He KZ, Xu ZB, Tang HQ, Wang ZD (2024) Effect of tensile cracks on the corrosion protection properties of anodic oxide films on 5083 Al alloy. J Alloys Compd 997:174950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17495010.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174950 ↗
42. Tian RZ, Wang ZT (2000) Aluminum Alloy and Its Processing Manual. Central South University Press, Changsha
43. Rao YQ, Wang Q, Oka D, Ramachandran CS (2020) On the PEO treatment of cold sprayed 7075 aluminum alloy and its effects on mechanical, corrosion and dry sliding wear performances thereof. Surf Coat Technol 383:125271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.12527110.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125271 ↗
44. Zhang Z, Deng YL, Ye LY, Wu WB, Wang FQ, Jiang KD, Guo XB (2020) Influence of aging treatments on the strength and localized corrosion resistance of aged Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 846:156223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15622310.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156223 ↗
45. Shao P, Xiao H, Liu K, Chen X, Hou MY, Zhang QB, Qiao C, Huang S (2024) Influence of annealing temperature on the mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of Ti–5.5Al–2.0Zr–1.5Sn–0.5Mo–1.5Nb alloy. Arabian J Chem 17:105790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2024.10579010.1016/j.arabjc.2024.105790 ↗
46. Akiyama E, Zhang ZG, Watanabe Y, Tsuzaki K (2008) Effects of severe plastic deformation on the corrosion behavior of aluminum alloys. J Solid State Electrochem 13:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-007-0496-910.1007/s10008-007-0496-9 ↗
47. Liu YR, Pan QL, Li H, Huang ZQ, Ye J, Li MJ (2019) Revealing the evolution of microstructure, mechanical property and corrosion behavior of 7A46 aluminum alloy with different ageing treatment. J Alloys Compd 792:32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.32410.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.324 ↗
48. Lin Y, Lu CG, Wei CY, Zheng ZQ (2018) Effect of aging treatment on microstructures, tensile properties and intergranular corrosion behavior of Al-Cu-Li alloy. Materials Charact 141:163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.0410.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.04 ↗
49. Wang KX, Yin DF, Zhao YC, Atrens A, Zhao MC (2020) Microstructural evolution upon heat treatments and its effect on corrosion in Al–Zn–Mg alloys containing Sc and Zr. J Mater Res Technol 9:5077–5089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.02510.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.025 ↗
50. Wang YC, Yin LT, Jin Y, Pan JS, Leygraf C (2017) Numerical simulation of micro-galvanic corrosion in Al alloys: steric hindrance effect of corrosion product. J Electrochem Soc 164:1035–1043. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0871714jes10.1149/2.0871714jes ↗
51. Li CY, Fan XL, Cui LY, Zeng RC (2020) Corrosion resistance and electrical conductivity of a nano ATO-doped MAO/methyltrimethoxysilane composite coating on magnesium alloy AZ31. Corros Sci 168:108570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10857010.1016/j.corsci.2020.108570 ↗
52. Zhang HT, Guo C, Li SS, Li BM, Nagaumi H (2022) Influence of cold pre-deformation on the microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of Zn-bearing 5xxx aluminum alloy. J Mater Res Technol 16:1202–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.08010.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.080 ↗