Injectability study and rheological evaluation of Pluronic-derived thermosensitive hydrogels containing mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for bone regeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Moreira CDF et al (2019) Injectable chitosan/gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite hydrogels for potential bone regeneration: in vitro and in vivo analyses. Int J Biol Macromol 132:811–82110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.237 ↗
2. Amirthalingam S et al (2021) Combinatorial effect of nano whitlockite/nano bioglass with FGF-18 in an injectable hydrogel for craniofacial bone regeneration. Biomater Sci 9:2439–245310.1039/D0BM01496F ↗
3. Liao J et al (2017) Injectable alginate hydrogel cross-linked by calcium gluconate- loaded porous microspheres for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Omega. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b0049510.1021/acsomega.6b00495 ↗
4. Cai Z et al (2021) Anti-Inflammatory and prochondrogenic in situ-formed injectable hydrogel crosslinked by strontium-doped bioglass for cartilage regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:59772–5978610.1021/acsami.1c20565 ↗
5. Vitale-Brovarone C et al (2018) Hybrid injectable platforms for the in situ delivery of therapeutic ions from mesoporous glasses. Chem Eng J 340:103–11310.1016/j.cej.2018.01.073 ↗
6. Sang X, Zhao X, Yan L, Jin X, Wang X (2022) Thermosensitive hydrogel loaded with primary chondrocyte- derived exosomes promotes cartilage repair by regulating macrophage polarization in osteoarthritis. Tissue Eng Regen Med 19:629–64210.1007/s13770-022-00437-5 ↗
7. Chatterjee S, Hui PC, Kan C (2018) Thermoresponsive hydrogels and their biomedical applications: special insight into their applications in textile based transdermal therapy. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1005048010.3390/polym10050480 ↗
8. Moreira CDF et al (2018) Nanostructured chitosan/gelatin/bioactive glass in situ forming hydrogel composites as a potential injectable matrix for bone tissue engineering. Mater Chem Phys 218:304–31610.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.07.039 ↗
9. Deliormanlı AM, Türk M (2020) Flow behavior and drug release study of injectable Pluronic F - 127 hydrogels containing bioactive glass and carbon - based nanopowders. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 30:1184–119610.1007/s10904-019-01346-2 ↗
10. Zambanini T et al (2021) Holmium-containing bioactive glasses dispersed in poloxamer 407 hydrogel as a theragenerative composite for bone cancer treatment. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1406145910.3390/ma14061459 ↗
11. Gyles D, Diniz L, Otávio J, Silva C, Ribeiro-costa RM (2017) A review of the designs and prominent biomedical advances of natural and synthetic hydrogel formulations. Eur Polym J 88:373–39210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.01.027 ↗
12. Klouda L (2015) Thermoresponsive hydrogels in biomedical applications a seven-year update. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.05.01710.1016/j.ejpb.2015.05.017 ↗
13. Kjøniksen A, Calejo MT, Zhu K, Nystr B, Sande SA (2014) Stabilization of pluronic gels in the presence of different polysaccharides. J Appl Polym Sci 40465:1–8
14. Hom WL, Bhatia SR (2017) Significant enhancement of elasticity in alginate-clay nanocomposite hydrogels with PEO-PPO-PEO copolymers. Polymer (Guildf) 109:170–17510.1016/j.polymer.2016.12.058 ↗
15. Yang J, Yeom J, Woo B, Hoffman AS, Kwang S (2014) In situ -forming injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine. Prog Polym Sci 39:1973–198610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.006 ↗
16. Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 9:4457–448610.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
17. Barabadi Z et al (2016) Fabrication of hydrogel based nanocomposite scaffold containing bioactive glass nanoparticles for myocardial tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 69:1137–114610.1016/j.msec.2016.08.012 ↗
18. Mosqueira L et al (2021) Strontium-releasing sol–gel bioactive glass spheres and their ability to stimulate osteogenic differentiation in osteoporotic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Res 36:459–47410.1557/s43578-020-00046-9 ↗
19. Nawaz Q et al (2018) Synthesis and characterization of manganese containing mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6070-410.1007/s10856-018-6070-4 ↗
20. Liu M et al (2017) Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Bone Res. https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2017.1410.1038/boneres.2017.14 ↗
21. Jones JR (2009) New trends in bioactive scaffolds: the importance of nanostructure. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:1275–128110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.003 ↗
22. Utech S, Boccaccini AR (2016) A review of hydrogel-based composites for biomedical applications: enhancement of hydrogel properties by addition of rigid inorganic fillers. J Mater Sci 51:271–31010.1007/s10853-015-9382-5 ↗
23. Won D, Kim M, Tae G (2015) Colloids and surfaces B: biointerfaces systemic modulation of the stability of pluronic hydrogel by a small amount of graphene oxide. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 128:515–52110.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.03.002 ↗
24. Gioffredi E et al (2016) Pluronic F127 hydrogel characterization and biofabrication in cellularized constructs for tissue engineering applications. Procedia CIRP 49:125–13210.1016/j.procir.2015.11.001 ↗
25. Moreira CDF, Carvalho SM, Mansur HS, Pereira MM (2016) Thermogelling chitosan-collagen-bioactive glass nanoparticle hybrids as potential injectable systems for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 58:1207–121610.1016/j.msec.2015.09.075 ↗
26. Chen S et al (2020) Biodegradable zinc-containing mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Mater Today Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.10006610.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100066 ↗
27. Boonlai W, Tantishaiyakul V, Hirun N, Sangfai T, Suknuntha K (2018) Thermosensitive poloxamer 407/Poly(Acrylic Acid) hydrogels with potential application as injectable drug delivery system. AAPS PharmSciTech 19:2103–211710.1208/s12249-018-1010-7 ↗
28. Radivojša M, Grabnar I, Grabnar PA (2013) Thermoreversible in situ gelling poloxamer-based systems with chitosan nanocomplexes for prolonged subcutaneous delivery of heparin: design and in vitro evaluation. Eur J Pharm Sci 50:93–10110.1016/j.ejps.2013.03.002 ↗
29. Boffito M et al (2016) Novel polyurethane-based thermosensitive hydrogels as drug release and tissue engineering platforms: design and in vitro characterization. Polym Int. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.508010.1002/pi.5080 ↗
30. Xin C, Lihong W, Qiuyuan L, Hongzhuo L (2014) Injectable long-term control-released in situ gels of hydrochloric thiothixene for the treatment of schizophrenia: preparation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm 469:23–3010.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.04.044 ↗
31. Hoppe A, Güldal NS, Boccaccini AR (2011) A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
32. Zheng K, Boccaccini AR (2017) Sol-gel processing of bioactive glass nanoparticles: a review. Adv Coll Interface Sci 249:363–37310.1016/j.cis.2017.03.008 ↗
33. Thommes M et al (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–106910.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
34. Zheng Y et al (2016) In vitro study of calcium phosphate layers on hydroxyapatite ceramics surface mineralized in different solutions. Ceram Int 42:1660–166510.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.119 ↗
35. Li Y, Chen X, Ning C, Yuan B, Hu Q (2015) Facile synthesis of mesoporous bioactive glasses with controlled shapes. Mater Lett 161:605–60810.1016/j.matlet.2015.09.057 ↗
36. Nawaz A, Bano S, Yasir M, Wadood A, Ur Rehman MA (2020) Ag and Mn-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles incorporated into the chitosan/gelatin coatings deposited on PEEK/bioactive glass layers for favorable osteogenic differentiation and antibacterial activity. Mater Adv 1:1273–128410.1039/D0MA00325E ↗
37. Yap LS, Yang MC (2016) Evaluation of hydrogel composing of Pluronic F127 and carboxymethyl hexanoyl chitosan as injectable scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 146:204–21110.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.094 ↗
38. Xie Y, Tang J, Lu Z, Sun Z, An L (2013) Effects of poly(Propylene Oxide)–Poly(Ethylene Oxide)–Poly(Propylene Oxide) triblock copolymer on the gelation of poly(Ethylene Oxide)–poly(Propylene Oxide)–poly(Ethylene Oxide) aqueous solutions. J Macromol Sci Part B 52:1183–119710.1080/00222348.2012.758524 ↗
39. Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Mencarelli G, Giorgioni G, Palmieri GF (2011) Thermosensitive self-assembling block copolymers as drug delivery systems. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym302077910.3390/polym3020779 ↗
40. Matanović MR, Kristl J, Grabnar PA (2014) Thermoresponsive polymers: Insights into decisive hydrogel characteristics, mechanisms of gelation, and promising biomedical applications. Int J Pharm 472:262–27510.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.06.029 ↗
41. Boucenna I, Royon L, Colinart P, Guedeau-Boudeville MA, Mourchid A (2010) Structure and thermorheology of concentrated pluronic copolymer micelles in the presence of laponite particles. Langmuir 26:14430–1443610.1021/la102744c ↗
42. Carlfors J, Edsman K, Petersson R, Jörnving K (1998) Rheological evaluation of Gelrite® in situ gels for ophthalmic use. Eur J Pharm Sci 6:113–11910.1016/S0928-0987(97)00074-2 ↗
43. Dou Q, Karim AA, Loh XJ (2016) Modification of thermal and mechanical properties of PEG-PPG-PEG copolymer (F127) with MA-POSS. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym809034110.3390/polym8090341 ↗
44. Zhang M, Djabourov M, Bourgaux C, Bouchemal K (2013) Nanostructured fluids from pluronic® mixtures. Int J Pharm 454:599–61010.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.01.043 ↗
45. Gentile L, De Luca G, Antunes FE, Rossi CO, Ranieri GA (2010) Thermogelation analysis of F127-water mixtures by physical Chemistry techniques. Appl Rheol 20:1–12
46. Zhang L, Parsons DL, Navarre C, Kompella UB (2002) Development and in-vitro evaluation of sustained release Poloxamer 407 (P407) gel formulations of ceftiofur. J Control Rel 85:73–8110.1016/S0168-3659(02)00273-0 ↗
47. Won DA, Kim M, Tae G (2015) Systemic modulation of the stability of pluronic hydrogel by a small amount of graphene oxide. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 128:515–52110.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.03.002 ↗
48. Branca C, Khouzami K, Wanderlingh U, D’Angelo G (2018) Effect of intercalated chitosan/clay nanostructures on concentrated pluronic F127 solution: a FTIR-ATR, DSC and rheological study. J Coll Interface Sci 517:221–22910.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.004 ↗
49. Sergi R, Bellucci D, Cannillo V (2020) A review of bioactive glass/natural polymer composites: state of the art. Materials (Basel) 13:1–38
50. Martins T et al (2017) Novel 3D composites with highly flexible behavior based on chitosan and bioactive glass for biomedical applications. Mater Chem Phys 189:1–1110.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.12.012 ↗
51. Gantar A et al (2014) Nanoparticulate bioactive-glass-reinforced gellan-gum hydrogels for bone-tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 43:27–3610.1016/j.msec.2014.06.045 ↗
52. Leite AJ, Mano JF (2017) Biomedical applications of natural-based polymers combined with bioactive glass nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B 5:4555–456810.1039/C7TB00404D ↗
53. Quah SP, Smith AJ, Preston AN, Laughlin ST, Bhatia SR (2018) Large-area alginate/PEO-PPO-PEO hydrogels with thermoreversible rheology at physiological temperatures. Polymer (Guildf) 135:171–17710.1016/j.polymer.2017.12.003 ↗
54. Dumortier G, Grossiord JL, Agnely F, Chaumeil JC (2006) A review of poloxamer 407 pharmaceutical and pharmacological characteristics. Pharm Res 23:2709–272810.1007/s11095-006-9104-4 ↗
55. Su YL, Wang J, Liu HZ (2002) FTIR spectroscopic investigation of effects of temperature and concentration on PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer properties in aqueous solutions. Macromolecules 35:6426–643110.1021/ma0105284 ↗
56. de Laia AGS et al (2020) Therapeutic cobalt ion incorporated in poly(vinyl alcohol)/bioactive glass scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 55:8710–872710.1007/s10853-020-04644-0 ↗
57. Park KM et al (2009) Thermosensitive chitosan-Pluronic hydrogel as an injectable cell delivery carrier for cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater 5:1956–196510.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.040 ↗
58. Fu S et al (2009) Injectable biodegradable thermosensitive hydrogel composite for orthopedic tissue engineering. 1. Preparation and characterization of nanohydroxyapatite/ poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel nanocomposites. J Phys Chem B 113:16518–1652510.1021/jp907974d ↗
59. dos Santos DMM, de Carvalho SM, Pereira MM, Houmard M, Nunes EHM (2019) Freeze-cast composite scaffolds prepared from sol-gel derived 58S bioactive glass and polycaprolactone. Ceram Int 45:9891–990010.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.030 ↗
60. Jung YP et al (2017) Thermo-sensitive injectable hydrogel based on the physical mixing of hyaluronic acid and Pluronic F-127 for sustained NSAID delivery. Carbohydr Polym 156:403–40810.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.068 ↗
61. Diniz IMA et al (2015) Pluronic F-127 hydrogel as a promising scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:1–1010.1007/s10856-015-5493-4 ↗
62. Cilurzo F et al (2011) Injectability evaluation: an open issue. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 12:604–60910.1208/s12249-011-9625-y ↗
63. Rungseevijitprapa W, Bodmeier R (2009) Injectability of biodegradable in situ forming microparticle systems (ISM). Eur J Pharm Sci 36:524–53110.1016/j.ejps.2008.12.003 ↗