Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (CMUT) Made with SWCNTs/Parylene-C Composite Membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Traditional CMUTs are fabricated from silicon-based membranes. However, the poor flexibility and high cost of silicon-based membranes have resulted in low output pressure and high manufacturing costs for the fabricated CMUTs. Here, we report the feasibility of a type of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs)/Parylene-C composite membrane for the fabrication of a CMUT. The innovative aspect of this method is the replacement of traditional silicon-based membranes with SWCNTs/Parylene-C composite membranes, which can simplify the process and reduce manufacturing costs. The SWCNTs/Parylene-C composite membrane has a Young’s modulus of 4.4 GPa and a surface resistivity of 29.6 Ω/sq. Prior to bonding, oxygen plasma treatment is performed on the SWCNTs/Parylene-C composite membrane and SU-8 surface to introduce functional groups such as hydroxyl and carboxyl, which aid in bonding. The resonance frequency of the fabricated CMUT is 2.108 MHz, and the quality factor is 52.6. The results suggest that the SWCNTs/Parylene-C composite membrane has potential for use in CMUT fabrication due to its excellent mechanical and electrical properties. The study provides a direction for the development of CMUTs with improved performance and may have significant applications in fields such as medical imaging and wearable health monitoring devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The School of Electrical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
Funding
School of Electrical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/tuffc.2003.125114210.1109/tuffc.2003.1251142 ↗
2. Chen, A. I. H.; Wong, L. L.; Logan, A. S.; Yeow, J. T. W. A CMUT-based real-time volumetric ultrasound imaging system with row-column addressing. 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE, 2011; pp 1755–1758.10.1109/ULTSYM.2011.0438 ↗
3. 10.1109/tuffc.2002.104974210.1109/tuffc.2002.1049742 ↗
4. 10.3390/mi1002015210.3390/mi10020152 ↗
5. 10.1109/51.54451110.1109/51.544511 ↗
6. 10.1155/2017/602702910.1155/2017/6027029 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.06.00910.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.06.009 ↗
8. 10.1109/tuffc.2014.672261010.1109/tuffc.2014.6722610 ↗
9. 10.1109/jsen.2016.259958010.1109/jsen.2016.2599580 ↗
10. Mills, D.; Smith, L. Real-time in-vivo imaging with capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (cMUT) linear arrays. 2003 IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics; IEEE, 2003; Vol. 1, pp 568–571.
11. Jie L. · Chin. J. Sci. Instrum. · 2018 · 39 · 98
12. 10.1109/tuffc.2016.255461210.1109/tuffc.2016.2554612 ↗
13. Legros, M.; Meynier, C.; Dufait, R.; Ferin, G.; Tranquart, F. Piezocomposite and CMUT arrays assessment through in vitro imaging performances. 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE, 2008; pp 1142–1145. ISSN: 1051-0117.10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0275 ↗
14. 10.1109/tuffc.2003.119796810.1109/tuffc.2003.1197968 ↗
15. 10.1109/tuffc.2006.166510910.1109/tuffc.2006.1665109 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.09.05510.1016/j.sna.2017.09.055 ↗
17. 10.1109/tuffc.2006.159338810.1109/tuffc.2006.1593388 ↗
18. Yu, T.; Lu, X.; Yu, F. Dual-bottom-electrode CMUT based on standard CMOS process. 2011 6th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems; IEEE, 2011; pp 21–24.10.1109/NEMS.2011.6017285 ↗
19. 10.1143/jjap.46.749610.1143/jjap.46.7496 ↗
20. Li, Z.; Chen, A. I. H.; Wong, L. L. P.; Na, S.; Yeow, J. T. W. Fabrication of polymer-based wafer-bonded capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers. 2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); IEEE, 2015; pp 1–4.
21. Chang, M. M.; Deng, M. T.; Gwo, J. T.; Mai, J. D.; Hsu, E. Polymer-based Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers (CMUT) for Micro Surgical Imaging Applications. 2006 1st IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems; IEEE, 2006; pp 61–65.10.1109/NEMS.2006.334622 ↗
22. Jie, L.; Wenjun, W.; Shan, X.; Fang, C. Effect of structural parameters on functional performance of CMUT: a simulation study and analysis. 2019 14th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement Instruments (ICEMI); IEEE, 2019; pp 936–941.10.1109/ICEMI46757.2019.9101897 ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.b.3158410.1002/jbm.b.31584 ↗
24. 10.1002/pat.372910.1002/pat.3729 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.9b2087710.1021/acsami.9b20877 ↗
26. 10.3390/polym401027510.3390/polym4010275 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20170438610.1002/adma.201704386 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2684210.1002/pc.26842 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.297663310.1063/1.2976633 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mee.2010.11.00810.1016/j.mee.2010.11.008 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.5b0400610.1021/acsami.5b04006 ↗
32. Wygant, I. O.; Kupnik, M.; Khuri-Yakub, B. T. Analytically calculating membrane displacement and the equivalent circuit model of a circular CMUT cell. 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE, 2008; pp 2111–2114.10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0522 ↗