UiO-66 derived nanoporous carbons/electrochemically reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites-based non-enzyme electrochemical sensor towards highly efficient determination of methyl parathion in food samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Shanmugam R, Manavalan S, Chen S-M, Keerthi M, Lin L-H (2020) Methyl parathion detection using SnS2/N, S–Co-doped reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:11194. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0252810.1021/acssuschemeng.0c02528 ↗
2. Ilager D, Shetti NP, Foucaud Y, Badawi M, Aminabhavi TM (2022) Graphene/g-carbon nitride (GO/g-C3N4) nanohybrids as a sensor material for the detection of methyl parathion and carbendazim. Chemosphere 292:133450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13345010.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133450 ↗
3. Liu X, Zhang H, Ma Y et al (2013) Graphene-coated silica as a highly efficient sorbent for residual organophosphorus pesticides in water. J Mater Chem A 1:1875. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TA00173J10.1039/C2TA00173J ↗
4. Liu L, Chen Z, Wang J et al (2019) Tuning the properties of Zr6O8 nodes in the metal organic framework UiO-66 by selection of node-bound ligands and linkers. Nat Chem 11:622. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0263-410.1038/s41557-019-0263-4 ↗
5. Chen Z, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Shi X, Zhang L, Jia G (2021) Hierarchical nitrogen-doped holey graphene as sensitive electrochemical sensor for methyl parathion detection. Sens Actuators B: Chem 336:129721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.12972110.1016/j.snb.2021.129721 ↗
6. CS Pundir, A Malik, Preety (2019) Bio‐sensing of organophosphorus pesticides: a review. Biosens Bioelectron 140:111348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.11134810.1016/j.bios.2019.111348 ↗
7. Tian X, Liu L, Li Y et al (2018) Nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor based on CuO–TiO2 for sensitive and selective detection of methyl parathion pesticide in ground water. Sens Actuators, B Chem 256:135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.10.06610.1016/j.snb.2017.10.066 ↗
8. Jaacks LM, Diao N, Calafat AM et al (2019) Association of prenatal pesticide exposures with adverse pregnancy outcomes and stunting in rural Bangladesh. Environ Int 133:105243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.10524310.1016/j.envint.2019.105243 ↗
9. Chen J, Zhang W-T, Shu Y, Ma X-H, Cao X-Y (2017) Detection of organophosphorus pesticide residues in leaf lettuce and cucumber through molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction coupled to gas chromatography. Food Analyt Methods 10:3452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-0875-510.1007/s12161-017-0875-5 ↗
10. Borrás E, Sánchez P, Muñoz A, Tortajada-Genaro LA (2011) Development of a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method for the determination of pesticides in gaseous and particulate phases in the atmosphere. Anal Chim Acta 699:57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2011.05.00910.1016/j.aca.2011.05.009 ↗
11. Harshit D, Charmy K, Nrupesh P (2017) Organophosphorus pesticides determination by novel HPLC and spectrophotometric method. Food Chem 230:448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.08310.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.083 ↗
12. Liu G, Lin Y (2005) Carbon nanotube-modified glassy carbon electrode for adsorptive stripping voltammetric detection of ultratrace levels of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. Anal Chem 77:5894. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050791t10.1021/ac050791t ↗
13. Kaur R, Rana S, Lalit K, Singh P, Kaur K (2020) Electrochemical detection of methyl parathion via a novel biosensor tailored on highly biocompatible electrochemically reduced graphene oxide-chitosan-hemoglobin coatings. Biosens Bioelectron 167:112486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.11248610.1016/j.bios.2020.112486 ↗
14. Charithra MM, Manjunatha JGG, Raril C (2020) Surfactant modified graphite paste electrode as an electrochemical sensor for the enhanced voltammetric detection of estriol with dopamine and uric acid. Adv Pharm Bull 10:247. https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2020.02910.34172/apb.2020.029 ↗
15. Liu Q, Fei A, Huan J, Mao H, Wang K (2015) A fast, simple and green method for the extraction of carbamate pesticides from rice by microwave assisted steam extraction coupled with solid phase extraction. J Electroanal Chem 740:8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.12.03710.1016/j.jelechem.2014.12.037 ↗
16. Rana S, Kaur R, Jain R, Prabhakar N (2019) Ionic liquid assisted growth of poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/reduced graphene oxide based electrode: an improved electro-catalytic performance for the detection of organophosphorus pesticides in beverages. Arab J Chem 12:1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.08.00810.1016/j.arabjc.2018.08.008 ↗
17. Arjmand M, Saghafifar H, Alijanianzadeh M, Soltanolkotabi M (2017) A sensitive tapered-fiber optic biosensor for the label-free detection of organophosphate pesticides. Sens Actuators, B Chem 249:523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.04.12110.1016/j.snb.2017.04.121 ↗
18. Hareesha N, Manjunatha JG, Amrutha BM, Sreeharsha N, Basheeruddin Asdaq SM, Anwer MK (2021) A fast and selective electrochemical detection of vanillin in food samples on the surface of poly (glutamic acid) functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphite composite paste sensor. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 626:127042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12704210.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127042 ↗
19. Manjunatha JG, Swamy BEK, Gilbert O, Mamatha GP, Sherigara BS (2010) Sensitive voltammetric determination of dopamine at salicylic acid and TX-100, SDS, CTAB modified carbon paste electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci 5:68210.1016/S1452-3981(23)15315-6 ↗
20. Gao N, He C, Ma M et al (2019) Electrochemical co-deposition synthesis of Au–ZrO2-graphene nanocomposite for a nonenzymatic methyl parathion sensor. Anal Chim Acta 1072:25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.04.04310.1016/j.aca.2019.04.043 ↗
21. Ramachandran T, Dhayabaran VV (2019) Utilization of a MnO 2/polythiophene/rGO nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode as an electrochemical sensor for methyl parathion. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 30:12315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01590-910.1007/s10854-019-01590-9 ↗
22. Lv Y, Yang T, Hou X et al (2022) Zirconia nanofibers-loaded reduced graphene oxide fabrication for specific electrochemical detection of methyl parathion. J Alloys Compd 904:163798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16379810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163798 ↗
23. Manjunatha JG (2020) Poly (adenine) modified graphene-based voltammetric sensor for the electrochemical determination of catechol, hydroquinone and resorcinol. Open Chem Eng J 14:52. https://doi.org/10.2174/187412310201401005210.2174/1874123102014010052 ↗
24. Raril C, Manjunatha JG (2018) Sensitive electrochemical analysis of resorcinol using polymer modified carbon paste electrode: a cyclic voltammetric study. Anal Bioanal Electrochem 10(4):488–498
25. Tigari G, Manjunatha JG (2020) Chromogenic and fluorogenic chemosensors and reagents for anions. A comprehensive review of the year 2009. Instrum Exp Tech 63:750. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002044122005013910.1134/S0020441220050139 ↗
26. Lashgari S, Tarlani A, Zanjanchi MA (2022) New nanoporous TiO2 with controlled porosities emanated from two concurrent correlative templates as potent adsorbents. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects 31:100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2022.10088110.1016/j.nanoso.2022.100881 ↗
27. Wang L, Meng T, Chen C et al (2018) Facile synthesis of ZnCo-ZIFs-derived ZnxCo3− xO4 hollow polyhedron for efficient oxygen evolution reduction. J Colloid Interface Sci 532:650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.03810.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.038 ↗
28. Safaei M, Foroughi MM, Ebrahimpoor N, Jahani S, Omidi A, Khatami M (2019) A review on metal-organic frameworks: synthesis and applications. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 118:401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.00710.1016/j.trac.2019.06.007 ↗
29. Kempahanumakkagari S, Vellingiri K, Deep A, Kwon EE, Bolan N, Kim K-H (2018) Metal–organic framework composites as electrocatalysts for electrochemical sensing applications. Coord Chem Rev 357:105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.02810.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.028 ↗
30. Jiang Y, Cheng G, Li Y et al (2021) Promoting vanadium redox flow battery performance by ultra-uniform ZrO2@ C from metal-organic framework. Chem Eng J 415:129014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.12901410.1016/j.cej.2021.129014 ↗
31. Sung Cho H, Deng H, Miyasaka K et al (2015) Extra adsorption and adsorbate superlattice formation in metal-organic frameworks. Nature 527:503. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1573410.1038/nature15734 ↗
32. Chen D, Sun H, Wang Y et al (2020) UiO-66 derived zirconia/porous carbon nanocomposites for efficient removal of carbamazepine and adsorption mechanism. Appl Surf Sci 507:145054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14505410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145054 ↗
33. Meng T, Wang L, Jia H et al (2019) Facile synthesis of platinum-embedded zirconia/porous carbons tri-component nanohybrids from metal-organic framework and their application for ultra-sensitively detection of methyl parathion. J Colloid Interface Sci 536:424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.07610.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.076 ↗
34. Zhu W, Yue X, Duan J et al (2016) Electrochemically co-reduced 3D GO-C60 nanoassembly as an efficient nanocatalyst for electrochemical detection of bisphenol S. Electrochim Acta 188:85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.13110.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.131 ↗
35. Lu M, Deng Y, Luo Y et al (2019) Graphene aerogel–metal–organic framework-based electrochemical method for simultaneous detection of multiple heavy-metal ions. Anal Chem 91:888. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b0376410.1021/acs.analchem.8b03764 ↗
36. Govindasamy M, Sakthinathan S, Chen S-M, Chiu T-W, Sathiyan A, Merlin JP (2017) Reduced graphene oxide supported cobalt bipyridyl complex for sensitive detection of methyl parathion in fruits and vegetables. Electroanalysis 29:1950. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.20170018610.1002/elan.201700186 ↗
37. Gao N, Tan R, Cai Z, Zhao H, Chang G, He Y (2021) A novel electrochemical sensor via Zr-based metal organic framework–graphene for pesticide detection. J Mater Sci 56:19060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06436-610.1007/s10853-021-06436-6 ↗
38. Tu X, Xie Y, Ma X et al (2019) Highly stable reduced graphene oxide-encapsulated Ce-MOF composite as sensing material for electrochemically detecting dichlorophen. J Electroanalyt Chem 848:113268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.11326810.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113268 ↗
39. Gannavarapu KP, Ganesh V, Thakkar M, Mitra S, Dandamudi RB (2019) Nanostructured Diatom-ZrO2 composite as a selective and highly sensitive enzyme free electrochemical sensor for detection of methyl parathion. Sens Actuators, B Chem 288:611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.03.03610.1016/j.snb.2019.03.036 ↗
40. Manavalan S, Veerakumar P, Chen S-M, Lin K-C (2019) Three-dimensional zinc oxide nanostars anchored on graphene oxide for voltammetric determination of methyl parathion. Microchim Acta 187:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-4031-310.1007/s00604-019-4031-3 ↗
41. Palomino Cabello C, Picó MFF, Maya F, del Rio M, Turnes Palomino G (2018) UiO-66 derived etched carbon/polymer membranes: High-performance supports for the extraction of organic pollutants from water. Chem Eng J 346:85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.01910.1016/j.cej.2018.04.019 ↗
42. Unnikrishnan B, Mani V, Chen S-M (2012) Highly sensitive amperometric sensor for carbamazepine determination based on electrochemically reduced graphene oxide–single-walled carbon nanotube composite film. Sens Actuators, B Chem 173:274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.08810.1016/j.snb.2012.06.088 ↗
43. Lai Y, Wang F, Zhang Y et al (2019) UiO-66 derived N-doped carbon nanoparticles coated by PANI for simultaneous adsorption and reduction of hexavalent chromium from waste water. Chem Eng J 378:122069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12206910.1016/j.cej.2019.122069 ↗
44. Takagi H, Maruyama K, Yoshizawa N, Yamada Y, Sato Y (2004) XRD analysis of carbon stacking structure in coal during heat treatment. Fuel 83:2427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.06.01910.1016/j.fuel.2004.06.019 ↗
45. Torad NL, Hu M, Ishihara S et al (2014) Direct synthesis of MOF‐derived nanoporous carbon with magnetic Co nanoparticles toward efficient water treatment. Small 10:2096. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20130291010.1002/smll.201302910 ↗
46. Wang Y, Alsmeyer DC, McCreery RL (1990) Raman spectroscopy of carbon materials: structural basis of observed spectra. Chem Mater 2:557. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00011a01810.1021/cm00011a018 ↗
47. Wang W, Quan H, Gao W et al (2017) N-Doped hierarchical porous carbon from waste boat-fruited sterculia seed for high performance supercapacitors. RSC Adv 7:16678. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01043E10.1039/C7RA01043E ↗
48. Valenzano L, Civalleri B, Chavan S et al (2011) Disclosing the complex structure of UiO-66 metal organic framework: a synergic combination of experiment and theory. Chem Mater 23:1700. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm102288210.1021/cm1022882 ↗
49. Dey SK, Wang C-G, Tang D et al (2003) Atomic layer chemical vapor deposition of ZrO 2-based dielectric films: nanostructure and nanochemistry. J Appl Phys 93:4144. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.155525710.1063/1.1555257 ↗
50. Tsunekawa S, Asami K, Ito S, Yashima M, Sugimoto T (2005) XPS study of the phase transition in pure zirconium oxide nanocrystallites. Appl Surf Sci 252:1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.03.18310.1016/j.apsusc.2005.03.183 ↗
51. Gong J, Miao X, Zhou T, Zhang L (2011) An enzymeless organophosphate pesticide sensor using Au nanoparticle-decorated graphene hybrid nanosheet as solid-phase extraction. Talanta 85:1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.06.01610.1016/j.talanta.2011.06.016 ↗
52. Ma L, He Y, Wang Y et al (2019) Nanocomposites of Pt nanoparticles anchored on UiO66-NH2 as carriers to construct acetylcholinesterase biosensors for organophosphorus pesticide detection. Electrochim Acta 318:525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.11010.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.110 ↗
53. Parham H, Rahbar N (2010) Square wave voltammetric determination of methyl parathion using ZrO2-nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode. J Hazard Mater 177:1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.03110.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.031 ↗
54. Karimi MA, Banifatemeh F, Ranjbar M (2017) Chemical synthesis of graphene oxide and graphene and application of them in corrosion and electronic behavior of Ni–Zn–GO/rGO composite coatings on copper. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 28:1844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5735-310.1007/s10854-016-5735-3 ↗
55. Wang M, Li Z (2008) Scalable routes to Janus Au−SiO2 and Ternary Ag−Au−SiO2 nanoparticles. Sens Actuators, B Chem 133:607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2008.03.02310.1016/j.snb.2008.03.023 ↗
56. Gong J, Miao X, Wan H, Song D (2012) Facile synthesis of zirconia nanoparticles-decorated graphene hybrid nanosheets for an enzymeless methyl parathion sensor. Sens Actuators, B Chem 162:341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.12.09410.1016/j.snb.2011.12.094 ↗
57. Zhao H, Ma H, Li X, Liu B, Liu R, Komarneni S (2021) Nanocomposite of halloysite nanotubes/multi-walled carbon nanotubes for methyl parathion electrochemical sensor application. Appl Clay Sci 200:105907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2020.10590710.1016/j.clay.2020.105907 ↗
58. Li Y, Du C, Liu X, Wang K, Yang H, Li Y (2021) Non-enzymatic methyl parathion electrochemical sensor based on hydroxyl functionalized ionic liquid/zeolitic imidazolate framework composites modified glassy carbon electrode. J Electrochem Soc 168:077511. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac13d410.1149/1945-7111/ac13d4 ↗
59. Ma B, Cheong L-Z, Weng X, Tan C-P, Shen C (2018) Lipase@ ZIF-8 nanoparticles-based biosensor for direct and sensitive detection of methyl parathion. Electrochim Acta 283:509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.17610.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.176 ↗