journal article·2022-05

Adsorption of diatomic gas molecules on transition-metal-decorated GeC monolayers

Alma L. Marcos-Viquez, Lucía G. Arellano, Álvaro Miranda, Miguel Cruz-Irisson, Luis A. Pérez

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, we study the adsorption of O2, N2 and NO molecules on graphene-like germanium carbide monolayers (2DGeC) decorated with transition metal (TM) atoms (Au, Ag and Cu) using density functional calculations. The results show that, in comparison with the pristine 2DGeC, the TM adatoms enhance the adsorption of these molecules, except for N2 on Au-2DGeC and Ag-2DGeC. The largest increment of adsorption energy (EA) for the studied molecules is found for the Cu-adatom case, followed by the Ag and Au ones, in decreasing order of EA. Moreover, the metal-decorated 2DGeC monolayers give electronic charge to the adsorbed molecules, which weakens the molecule bond. In all the TM-decorated 2DGeC, the N2 molecule has the smallest values of EA, in comparison with the other studied molecules. Finally, since NO has the largest EA in comparison with those of O2 and N2 on the TM-decorated 2DGeC, these nanosheets could be used as NO traps to fight air pollution.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang S, Jiang C, Wei S-H (2017) Gas sensing in 2D materials. App Phys Rev 4:021304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.498331010.1063/1.4983310 ↗
2. Schwierz F, Pezoldt J, Granzner R (2015) Two-dimensional materials and their prospects in transistor electronics. Nanoscale 7:8261. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR01052G10.1039/C5NR01052G ↗
3. Rojaee R, Shahbazian-Yassar R (2020) Two-Dimensional Materials to Address the Lithium Battery Challenges. ACS Nano 14:2628–2658. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b0839610.1021/acsnano.9b08396 ↗
4. Fan X, Zhang G, Zhang F (2015) Multiple roles of graphene in heterogeneous catalysis. Chem Soc Rev 44:3023–3035. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00094G10.1039/C5CS00094G ↗
5. Tang X, Du A, Kou L (2018) Gas sensing and capturing based on two-dimensional layered materials: Overview from theoretical perspective. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 8:e1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.136110.1002/wcms.1361 ↗
6. Yu X-f, Li Y-c, Cheng J-b, Liu Z-b, Li Q-z, Li W-z, Yang X, Xiao B (2015) Monolayer Ti2CO2: A promising candidate for NH3 sensor or capturer with high sensitivity and selectivity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:13707–13713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0373710.1021/acsami.5b03737 ↗
7. Xiao B, Li Y-c, Yu X-f, Cheng J-b (2016) MXenes: Reusable materials for NH3 sensor or capturer by controlling the charge injection. Sens Actuators B Chem 235:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.05.06210.1016/j.snb.2016.05.062 ↗
8. Ma S, Yuan D, Jiao Z, Wang T, Dai X (2017) Monolayer Sc2CO2: A promising candidate as a SO2 gas sensor or capturer. J Phys Chem C 121:24077–24084. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0792110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07921 ↗
9. Jiao Y, Du A, Zhu Z, Rudolph V, Lu GQ, Smith SC (2011) A density functional theory study on CO2 capture and activation by graphene-like boron nitride with boron vacancy. Catal Today 175:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.02.04310.1016/j.cattod.2011.02.043 ↗
10. Sun Q, Li Z, Searles DJ, Chen Y, Lu G, Du A (2013) Charge-controlled switchable CO2 capture on boron nitride nanomaterials. J Am Chem Soc 135:8246–8253. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja400243r10.1021/ja400243r ↗
11. Ma D, Ju W, Li T, Zhang X, He C, Ma B, Lu Z, Yang Z (2016) The adsorption of CO and NO on the MoS2 monolayer doped with Au, Pt, Pd, or Ni: A first-principles study. Appl Surf Sci 383:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.17110.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.171 ↗
12. Marcos-Viquez AL, Miranda A, Cruz-Irisson M, Pérez LA (2021) Gas adsorption enhancement on transition-metal-decorated tin carbide monolayers. Mater Lett 298:130030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13003010.1016/j.matlet.2021.130030 ↗
13. Luo H, Cao Y, Zhou J, Feng J, Cao J, Guo H (2016) Adsorption of NO2, NH3 on monolayer MoS2 doped with Al, Si, and P: A first-principles study. Chem Phys Lett 643:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2015.10.07710.1016/j.cplett.2015.10.077 ↗
14. Zhang Y-H, Chen Y-B, Zhou K-G, Liu C-H, Zeng J, Zhang H-L, Peng Y (2009) Improving gas sensing properties of graphene by introducing dopants and defects: A first-principles study. Nanotechnology 20:185504. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/18550410.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185504 ↗
15. Mao Y, Long L, Yuan J, Zhong J, Zhao H (2018) Toxic gases molecules (NH3, SO2 and NO2) adsorption on GeSe monolayer with point defects engineering. Chem Phys Lett 706:501–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.06110.1016/j.cplett.2018.06.061 ↗
16. Prasongkit J, Amorim RG, Chakraborty S, Ahuja R, Scheicher RH, Amornkitbamrung V (2015) Highly sensitive and selective gas detection based on silicene. J Phys Chem C 119:16934–16940. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0363510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03635 ↗
17. Marcos-Viquez AL, Miranda A, Cruz-Irisson M, Pérez LA (2021) Tin carbide monolayers as potential gas sensors. Mater Lett 294:129751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.12975110.1016/j.matlet.2021.129751 ↗
18. Şahin H et al (2009) Monolayer honeycomb structures of group-IV elements and III-V binary compounds: First-principles calculations. Phys Rev B 80:155453. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.15545310.1103/PhysRevB.80.155453 ↗
19. Gökçe AG, Ersan F (2017) Adsorption of alkali and alkaline earth metal atoms and dimers on monolayer germanium carbide. Philos Mag 97:155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2016.124851710.1080/14786435.2016.1248517 ↗
20. Lü T-Y, Liao X-X, Wang H-Q, Zheng J-C (2012) Tuning the indirect–direct band gap transition of SiC, GeC and SnC monolayer in a graphene-like honeycomb structure by strain engineering: a quasiparticle GW study. J Mater Chem 22:10062–10068. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM30915G10.1039/C2JM30915G ↗
21. Xu Z, Li Y, Liu Z (2016) Controlling electronic and optical properties of layered SiC and GeC sheets by strain engineering. Mater Des 108:333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.11510.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.115 ↗
22. Xu Z, Li Y, Li C, Liu Z (2016) Tunable electronic and optical behaviors of two-dimensional germanium carbide. Appl Surf Sci 367:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.13610.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.136 ↗
23. Jin H, Dai Y, Huang B-B (2016) Design of Advanced Photocatalysis System by Adatom Decoration in 2D Nanosheets of Group-IV and III–V Binary Compounds. Sci Rep 6:23104. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2310410.1038/srep23104 ↗
24. Soler JM, Artacho E, Gale JD, García A, Junquera J, Ordejón P, Sánchez-Portal D (2002) The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J Phys Condens Matter 14:2745. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/30210.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
25. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
26. Troullier N, Martins JL (1991) Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations. Phys Rev B 43:1993–200610.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
27. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188–5192. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
28. Grimme S (2006) Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J Comput Chem 27:1787e99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
29. Fonseca Guerra C, Handgraaf J-W, Baerends EJ, Bickelhaupt FM (2004) Voronoi deformation density (VDD) charges: assessment of the Mulliken, Bader, Hirshfeld, Weinhold, and VDD methods for charge analysis. J Comput Chem 25:189e210. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.1035110.1002/jcc.10351 ↗
30. Oprea A, Bârsan N, Weimar U (2009) Work function changes in gas sensitive materials: Fundamentals and applications. Sens Actuators B Chem 142:470–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2009.06.04310.1016/j.snb.2009.06.043 ↗
31. Bertocchi M, Amato M, Marri I, Ossicini S (2017) Tuning the Work Function of Si(100) Surface by Halogen Absorption: A DFT Study. Phys Stat Sol C 14:1700193. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.20170019310.1002/pssc.201700193 ↗
32. Bruno M, Palummo M, Marini A, Del Sole R, Ossicini S (2007) From Si nanowires to porous silicon: The role of excitonic effects. Phys Rev Lett 98:036807. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.03680710.1103/PhysRevLett.98.036807 ↗