journal article·2019-08

Electronic properties and defect levels induced by group III substitution–interstitial complexes in Ge

E. Igumbor, G. M. Dongho-Nguimdo, R. E. Mapasha, W. E. Meyer

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

In this report, we used the hybrid density functional theory to systematically investigate the formation of substitution–interstitial complex defects formed by group III (B, Al, Ga and In) atoms in Ge for charge states − 2, − 1, 0, + 1 and + 2 as a function of the Fermi level. Under equilibrium conditions, the substitution–interstitial complexes in Ge formation energies were found to be relatively lower than 7.00 eV and stable with respect to their binding energies. For the neutral charge state, the Al $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ Ga $$i$$ complex (where Al $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ and Ga $$i$$ represent Al substitution in Ge and Ga interstitial, respectively) is the most stable defect with a binding and formation energies of 2.41 and 4.14 eV, respectively. Substitution–interstitial complexes induced defect levels in the band gap of Ge. Whereas the shallow donor defects are the B $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ Al $$i$$ and In $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ Ga $$i$$ , the deep acceptor defects are Ga $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ B $$i$$ , B $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ Ga $$i$$ , Al $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ B $$i$$ and B $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ Al $$i$$ . The In $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ Ga $$i$$ acts as a shallow single donor defect, the In $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ Al $$i$$ and Al $$_{\mathrm {Ge}}$$ In $$i$$ induced only donor levels. The substitution–interstitial defects do not only alter the known electronic properties of the pristine host but also provide a new interesting character.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Semiconductor materials and devices · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Claeys C, Simoen E (2011) Germanium-based technologies: from materials to devices. Elsevier, Amsterdam
2. Igumbor E, Mapasha RE, Meyer WE (2017) Ab initio study of aluminium impurity and interstitial–substitutional complexes in Ge using a hybrid functional (HSE). J Electron Mater 46(7):3880–388710.1007/s11664-016-5026-z ↗
3. Igumbor E, Omotoso E, Tunhuma SM, Danga HT, Meyer WE (2017) Rare earth substitutional impurities in germanium: a hybrid density functional theory study. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 409:31–3510.1016/j.nimb.2017.05.045 ↗
4. Igumbor E, Mapasha RE, Andrew R, Meyer WE (2016) First principle hybrid functional calculation of TmGe$$3+$$-VGeVGe defect complexes in germanium. Comput Condens Matter 8:31–3510.1016/j.cocom.2016.07.003 ↗
5. Chroneos A, Uberuaga BP, Grimes RW (2007) Carbon, dopant, and vacancy interactions in germanium. J Appl Phys 102(8):08370710.1063/1.2798875 ↗
6. Śpiewak P, Vanhellemont J, Sueoka K, Kurzydłowski K, Romandic I (2008) First principles calculations of the formation energy and deep levels associated with the neutral and charged vacancy in germanium. J Appl Phys 103(8):08610310.1063/1.2907730 ↗
7. Chroneos A, Londos C, Bracht H (2011) A-centers and isovalent impurities in germanium: density functional theory calculations. Mater Sci Eng B 176(5):453–45710.1016/j.mseb.2011.01.004 ↗
8. Haller E, Joos B, Falicov L (1980) Acceptor complexes in germanium: systems with tunneling hydrogen. Phys Rev B 21(10):472910.1103/PhysRevB.21.4729 ↗
9. Bracht H (2014) Defect engineering in germanium. Phys Status Solidi (a) 211(1):109–11710.1002/pssa.201300151 ↗
10. Nyamhere C, Das M, Auret FD, Chawanda A (2008) A study of electron induced defects in n-type germanium by deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS). Phys Status Solidi (c) 5(2):623–62510.1002/pssc.200776812 ↗
11. Auret F, van Rensburg PJ, Hayes M, Nel J, Coelho S, Meyer W, Decoster S, Matias V, Vantomme A, Smeets D (2007) Electrical characterization of defects in heavy-ion implanted n-type Ge. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 257(12):169–17110.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.107 ↗
12. Coelho SM, Auret FD, van Rensburg PJ, Nel J (2014) Unexpected properties of the inductively coupled plasma induced defect in germanium. Phys B Condens Matter 439:97–10010.1016/j.physb.2013.10.061 ↗
13. Mikelsen M, Bleka J, Christensen J, Monakhov E, Svensson B, Härkönen J, Avset B (2007) Annealing of the divacancy-oxygen and vacancy-oxygen complexes in silicon. Phys Rev B 75(15):15520210.1103/PhysRevB.75.155202 ↗
14. Alfieri G, Monakhov E, Avset B, Svensson B (2003) Evidence for identification of the divacancy-oxygen center in Si. Phys Rev B 68(23):23320210.1103/PhysRevB.68.233202 ↗
15. Adey J, Goss J, Jones R, Briddon P (2003) Interstitial boron defects in Si. Phys B Condens Matter 340:505–50810.1016/j.physb.2003.09.147 ↗
16. Carvalho A, Jones R, Sanati M, Estreicher S, Coutinho J, Briddon P (2006) First-principles investigation of a bistable boron-oxygen interstitial pair in Si. Phys Rev B 73(24):24521010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245210 ↗
17. Monakhov EV, Svensson BG (2014) Point defect complexes in silicon, germanium, and their alloys: growth, defects, impurities, and nanocrystals, vol 255. CRC Press, Boca Raton
18. Csóré A, Von Bardeleben H, Cantin J, Gali A (2017) Characterization and formation of NV centers in 3C, 4H, and 6H SiC: an ab initio study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.0622910.1103/PhysRevB.96.085204 ↗
19. Dolgolenko A, Varentsov M, Gaidar G (2004) Energy-level position of bistable (CiCs)0 defect in the B configuration in the forbidden band of n-Si. Phys Status Solidi (b) 241(13):2914–292210.1002/pssb.200302060 ↗
20. Khirunenko LI, Sosnin MG, Duvanskii AV, Abrosimov NV, Riemann H (2017) Electronic absorption of interstitial boron-related defects in silicon. Phys Status Solidi (a) 214(7):170024510.1002/pssa.201700245 ↗
21. Igumbor E, Omotoso E, Danga HT, Tunhuma SM, Meyer WE (2017) Rare earth interstitial-complexes in Ge: hybrid density functional studies. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 409:9–1310.1016/j.nimb.2017.04.044 ↗
22. Weber J, Koehl W, Varley J, Janotti A, Buckley B, Van de Walle C, Awschalom D (2011) Defects in SiC for quantum computing. J Appl Phys 109(10):10241710.1063/1.3578264 ↗
23. Wang X, Zhao M, Bu H, Zhang H, He X, Wang A (2013) Formation and annealing behaviors of qubit centers in 4H-SiC from first principles. J Appl Phys 114(19):19430510.1063/1.4832457 ↗
24. Schmidt J, Macdonald D (2005) Recombination activity of iron–gallium and iron–indium pairs in silicon. J Appl Phys 97(11):11371210.1063/1.1929096 ↗
25. Sgourou E, Timerkaeva D, Londos C, Aliprantis D, Chroneos A, Caliste D, Pochet P (2013) Impact of isovalent doping on the trapping of vacancy and interstitial related defects in Si. J Appl Phys 113(11):11350610.1063/1.4795510 ↗
26. Makarenko L, Lastovskii S, Yakushevich H, Moll M, Pintilie I (2018) Effect of electron injection on defect reactions in irradiated silicon containing boron, carbon, and oxygen. J Appl Phys 123(16):16157610.1063/1.5010965 ↗
27. Heyd J, Scuseria GE, Ernzerhof M (2003) Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J Chem Phys 118(18):8207–821510.1063/1.1564060 ↗
28. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
29. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
30. Blochl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
31. Deák P, Aradi B, Frauenheim T, Janzén E, Gali A (2010) Accurate defect levels obtained from the HSE06 range-separated hybrid functional. Phys Rev B 81(15):15320310.1103/PhysRevB.81.153203 ↗
32. Igumbor E, Ouma C, Webb G, Meyer W (2016) Ab initio study of germanium di-interstitial using a hybrid functional (HSE). Phys B Condens Matter 480:191–19510.1016/j.physb.2015.08.015 ↗
33. Śpiewak P, Vanhellemont J, Sueoka K, Kurzydłowski KJ, Romandic I (2008) Ab initio simulation of self-interstitial in germanium. Mater Sci Semicond Process 11(5):328–33110.1016/j.mssp.2008.09.002 ↗
34. Tahini H, Chroneos A, Grimes RW, Schwingenschlögl U, Bracht H (2011) Diffusion of E centers in germanium predicted using GGA+U approach. Appl Phys Lett 99(7):07211210.1063/1.3625939 ↗
35. Igumbor E, Obodo K, Meyer WE (2015) Ab initio study of MgSe self-interstitial (Mgi and Sei). Solid State Phenom 242:440–44610.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.242.440 ↗
36. Morin FJ, Maita JP (1954) Conductivity and hall effect in the intrinsic range of germanium. Phys Rev 94(6):1525–152910.1103/PhysRev.94.1525 ↗
37. Igumbor E, Meyer WE (2016) A hybrid functional calculation of Tm3+ defects in germanium (Ge). Mater Sci Semicond Process 43:129–13310.1016/j.mssp.2015.12.015 ↗
38. Zhang S, Northrup JE (1991) Chemical potential dependence of defect formation energies in GaAs: application to Ga self-diffusion. Phys Rev Lett 67(17):233910.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2339 ↗
39. Freysoldt C, Neugebauer J, Van de Walle CG (2011) Electrostatic interactions between charged defects in supercells. Phys Status Solidi (b) 248(5):1067–107610.1002/pssb.201046289 ↗