journal article·2003-09

Properties of binary TiO2-SiO2 composite particles with various structures prepared by vapor phase hydrolysis

Byoung-Soo Lee, Dong-Jun Kang, Sun-Geon Kim

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 38· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Various TiO2/SiO2 composite nanoparticles were prepared by vapor phase hydrolysis of Titanium Tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) and Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) in a tubular reactor heated by electrical furnace by changing the methods of reactant mixing, the molar ratio of the precursors and the set temperature of the furnace. These variables affected the average size and the bulk composition of the particles as well as their morphological and crystalline structures. The morphological structures of the particles were reconfirmed as T-S, S-T and T/S as in the previous study. Various correlations were obtained between the molar ratio of the precursors, and the size, the composition and the TiO2 main peak intensity of the particles as a parameter of the mode of reactant mixing. In general, it was found that high content of silicon constituent showed translucent envelopes surrounding primary particles, which increased the dispersion diameter of the particles, reduced the thermal stability, retarded the anatase-to-rutile transformation and the initial photocatalytic degradation of phenol in an aqueous solution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Iron oxide chemistry and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Y. L. Lin, T. J. Wang and Y. Jin, Powder Technol. 123 (2002) 194.10.1016/S0032-5910(01)00470-3 ↗
2. C. Anderson and A. J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 9882.10.1021/j100024a033 ↗
3. X. Gao and I. E. Wachs, Catalysis Today 51 (1999) 233.10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00048-6 ↗
4. X. Fu, L. A. Clark, Q. Yang and M. A. Anderson, Environ. Sci. Technol. 647 (1996) 30.
5. Q. H. Powell, G. P. Fotou, T. T. Kodas and B. Anderson, J. Aerosol Sci. 26 (1995) S557.10.1016/0021-8502(95)97186-I ↗
6. S. Jain, T. T. Kodas, M. K. Wu and P. Preston, ibid. 28 (1997) 133.10.1016/S0021-8502(96)00068-7 ↗
7. S. H. Ehrman, S. K. Friedlander and M. R. Zachariah, ibid. 29 (1998) 687.10.1016/S0021-8502(97)00454-0 ↗
8. Y. Suyama, E. Ura and A. Kato, Jap. J. Chem. Soc. (Japan) (1978) 356.10.1246/nikkashi.1978.356 ↗
9. M. K. Akhtar, S. Pratsinis and S. V.R. Mastrangelo, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 75(1992) 3408.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04442.x ↗
10. G. P. Fotou, T. T. Kodas and B. Anderson, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 33 (2000) 557.10.1080/02786820050195395 ↗
11. S. K. Lee, K. W. Chung and S. G. Kim, ibid. 36 (2002) 763.10.1080/02786820290038456 ↗
12. W. H. Cho, D. J. Kangchung and S. G. Kim, AJ. Mater. Sc. Submitted (2002).
13. C. Anderson and A. J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem. 9882 (1995) 99.
14. F. Kirkbir and H. Komiyama, Chem. Lett. (1988) 791.10.1246/cl.1988.791 ↗
15. Y. Suyama, E. Ura and A. Kato, Jap. J. Chem. Soc. (Japan) (1978) 356.10.1246/nikkashi.1978.356 ↗
16. E. Matijevic, Q. Zhong and R. E. Partch, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 22 (1995) 162.10.1080/02786829408959737 ↗