journal article·2017-12Open access

Systematic investigation of the effect of oxygen mobility on CO oxidation over AgPt nanoshells supported on CeO2, TiO2 and Al2O3

Alisson H. M. da Silva, Thenner S. Rodrigues, Anderson G. M. da Silva, Pedro H. C. Camargo, Janaina F. Gomes, José M. Assaf

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 24

Abstract

Here, we have systematically investigated how the nature of the support influenced the oxygen mobility and activities in catalysts comprised of AgPt nanoshells deposited over inorganic oxides. We first synthesized AgPt nanoshells by galvanic replacement reaction between Ag nanospheres and PtCl6 2− (aq) combined with Pt reduction using hydroquinone as an auxiliary reducing agent. The nanoshells were then supported over TiO2, Al2O3 and CeO2. Through this methodology, we prepared materials with similar metallic nanoparticle AgPt compositions (~0.99 wt% Pt), sizes (43 ± 2 nm diameter), spherical shapes, surface morphologies, number of active sites $$ (\sim4.5\;\upmu{\text{mol}}\;{\text{g}}_{{{\text{cat}} .}} - 1 ) $$ and uniform distribution over the supports, differing only in terms of the nature of the support. The oxide reduction temperature, its capability of re-oxidation and the presence of oxygen mobility were strongly dependent on the metal–support interaction between AgPt nanoshells and oxide supports. These properties have significantly influenced their catalytic performances toward the CO oxidation. At 230 °C, the CO oxidation TOF was 40.4 ± 0.4, 6.9 ± 1, 1.4 ± 0.8 min−1 for AgPt/CeO2, AgPt/TiO2, AgPt/Al2O3, respectively. These differences were attributed to the concentration of oxygen vacancies in each catalyst, which presented exactly the same trend as that of the catalytic activities. Our results may have important contributions to the design of highly active metal oxide-based catalysts toward gas-phase oxidation transformations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (78)

Show source-provided references
1. Sun M, Fu Q, Gao L et al (2017) Catalysis under shell: improved CO oxidation reaction confined in Pt@h-BN core–shell nanoreactors. Nano Res 10:1403–1412. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1512-810.1007/s12274-017-1512-8 ↗
2. Rizo R, Sebastián D, Lázaro MJ, Pastor E (2017) On the design of Pt–Sn efficient catalyst for carbon monoxide and ethanol oxidation in acid and alkaline media. Appl Catal B Environ 200:246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.01110.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.011 ↗
3. Chen H, Liu Y, Yang F et al (2017) Active phase of FeOx/Pt catalysts in low-temperature CO oxidation and preferential oxidation of CO reaction. J Phys Chem C 121:10398–10405. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0139210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01392 ↗
4. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M, Gates BC (2012) Atomically dispersed supported metal catalysts. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 3:545–574. doi: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-062011-08093910.1146/annurev-chembioeng-062011-080939 ↗
5. Wang C, Wen C, Lauterbach J, Sasmaz E (2017) Superior oxygen transfer ability of Pd/MnOx–CeO2 for enhanced low temperature CO oxidation activity. Appl Catal B Environ 206:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.02010.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.020 ↗
6. Wang X, Zuo J, Luo Y, Jiang L (2017) New route to CeO2/LaCoO3 with high oxygen mobility for total benzene oxidation. Appl Surf Sci 396:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.03310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.033 ↗
7. Ramírez-López R, Elizalde I, Rodríguez-Méndez EE et al (2017) Al2O3–CeO2 sol–gel synthesis and addition of Rh to improve the oxygen mobility of mixed support. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 81:214–219. doi: 10.1007/s10971-016-4184-z10.1007/s10971-016-4184-z ↗
8. He H, Dai HX, Wong KW, Au CT (2003) RE0.6Zr0.4–x YxO2 (RE = Ce, Pr; x = 0, 0.05) solid solutions: an investigation on defective structure, oxygen mobility, oxygen storage capacity, and redox properties. Appl Catal A Gen 251:61–74. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00309-010.1016/S0926-860X(03)00309-0 ↗
9. Oemar U, Hidajat K, Kawi S (2015) Pd–Ni catalyst over spherical nanostructured Y2O3 support for oxy-CO2 reforming of methane: role of surface oxygen mobility. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:12227–12238. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.07610.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.076 ↗
10. Vasiliades MA, Makri MM, Djinović P et al (2016) Dry reforming of methane over 5 wt% Ni/Ce1-x PrxO2-δ catalysts: performance and characterisation of active and inactive carbon by transient isotopic techniques. Appl Catal B Environ 197:168–183. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.01210.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.012 ↗
11. Makri MM, Vasiliades MA, Petallidou KC, Efstathiou AM (2016) Effect of support composition on the origin and reactivity of carbon formed during dry reforming of methane over 5 wt% Ni/Ce1−x MxO2−δ (M = Zr4+, Pr3+) catalysts. Catal Today 259:150–164. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.06.01010.1016/j.cattod.2015.06.010 ↗
12. Mars P, van Krevelen DW (1954) Oxidations carried out by means of vanadium oxide catalysts. Chem Eng Sci 3(Supplem):41–59. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(54)80005-410.1016/S0009-2509(54)80005-4 ↗
13. Perdomo C, Pérez A, Molina R, Moreno S (2016) Storage capacity and oxygen mobility in mixed oxides from transition metals promoted by cerium. Appl Surf Sci 383:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.14510.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.145 ↗
14. Solsona B, Concepción P, Hernández S et al (2012) Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane over NiO–CeO2 mixed oxides catalysts. Catal Today 180:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.03.05610.1016/j.cattod.2011.03.056 ↗
15. Li S, Zhang C, Huang Z et al (2013) A Ni@ZrO2 nanocomposite for ethanol steam reforming: enhanced stability via strong metal-oxide interaction. Chem Commun 49:4226–4228. doi: 10.1039/C2CC37109J10.1039/C2CC37109J ↗
16. Kalamaras CM, Americanou S, Efstathiou AM (2011) “Redox” vs “associative formate with—OH group regeneration” WGS reaction mechanism on Pt/CeO2: effect of platinum particle size. J Catal 279:287–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.01.02410.1016/j.jcat.2011.01.024 ↗
17. Cargnello M, Doan-Nguyen VVT, Gordon TR et al (2013) Control of metal nanocrystal size reveals metal-support interface role for ceria catalysts. Science 341:771 LP–773 LP10.1126/science.1240148 ↗
18. Chen G, Zhao Y, Fu G et al (2014) Interfacial effects in iron–nickel hydroxide-platinum nanoparticles enhance catalytic oxidation. Science 344:495–49910.1126/science.1252553 ↗
19. Penkala B, Aubert D, Kaper H et al (2015) The role of lattice oxygen in CO oxidation over Ce18O2-based catalysts revealed under operando conditions. Catal Sci Technol 5:4839–4848. doi: 10.1039/C5CY00842E10.1039/C5CY00842E ↗
20. Wang LC, Widmann D, Behm RJ (2015) Reactive removal of surface oxygen by H2, CO and CO/H2 on a Au/CeO2 catalyst and its relevance to the preferential CO oxidation (PROX) and reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction. Catal Sci Technol 5:925–941. doi: 10.1039/C4CY01030B10.1039/C4CY01030B ↗
21. Fiorenza R, Crisafulli C, Condorelli GG et al (2015) Au–Ag/CeO2 and Au–Cu/CeO2 catalysts for volatile organic compounds oxidation and CO preferential oxidation. Catal Lett 145:1691–1702. doi: 10.1007/s10562-015-1585-510.1007/s10562-015-1585-5 ↗
22. Ribeiro MC, Rabelo-Neto RC, Mattos LV et al (2014) A relationship between the production of oxygenates from ethanol/steam mixtures and the oxygen mobility in transition metal oxide doped CeO2·SiO2 catalysts. J Phys Chem C 118:28007–28016. doi: 10.1021/jp509533g10.1021/jp509533g ↗
23. Si Z, Weng D, Wu X et al (2013) Lattice oxygen mobility and acidity improvements of NiO–CeO2–ZrO2 catalyst by sulfation for NOx reduction by ammonia. Catal Today 201:122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.05.00110.1016/j.cattod.2012.05.001 ↗
24. Widmann D, Behm RJ (2014) Activation of molecular oxygen and the nature of the active oxygen species for CO oxidation on oxide supported Au catalysts. Acc Chem Res 47:740–749. doi: 10.1021/ar400203e10.1021/ar400203e ↗
25. Zabilskiy M, Djinović P, Tchernychova E et al (2015) Nanoshaped CuO/CeO2 materials: effect of the exposed ceria surfaces on catalytic activity in N2O decomposition reaction. ACS Catal 5:5357–5365. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b0104410.1021/acscatal.5b01044 ↗
26. Fiévet F, Brayner R (2013) The polyol process. In: Brayner R, Fiévet F, Coradin T (eds) Nanomater. A danger or a promise? A chemical and biological perspective. Springer, London, pp 1–25
27. Rodrigues TS, da Silva AGM, Gonçalves MC et al (2015) AgPt hollow nanodendrites: synthesis and uniform dispersion over SiO2 support for catalytic applications. ChemNanoMat 1:46–51. doi: 10.1002/cnma.20150002510.1002/cnma.201500025 ↗
28. Rodrigues TS, da Silva AHM, da Silva AGM et al (2016) Hollow AgPt/SiO2 nanomaterials with controlled surface morphologies: is the number of Pt surface atoms imperative to optimize catalytic performances? Catal Sci Technol. doi: 10.1039/C5CY01415H10.1039/C5CY01415H ↗
29. Jiang SP (2006) A review of wet impregnation—an alternative method for the fabrication of high performance and nano-structured electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells. Mater Sci Eng A 418:199–210. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.05210.1016/j.msea.2005.11.052 ↗
30. Xia X, Wang Y, Ruditskiy A, Xia Y (2013) 25th anniversary article: galvanic replacement: a simple and versatile route to hollow nanostructures with tunable and well-controlled properties. Adv Mater 25:6313–6333. doi: 10.1002/adma.20130282010.1002/adma.201302820 ↗
31. da Silva AGM, Rodrigues TS, Slater TJA et al (2015) Controlling size, morphology, and surface composition of AgAu nanodendrites in 15 s for improved environmental catalysis under low metal loadings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:25624–25632. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b0872510.1021/acsami.5b08725 ↗
32. Qin H, Qian X, Meng T et al (2015) Pt/MOx/SiO2, Pt/MO x /TiO2, and Pt/MO x /Al2O3 catalysts for CO oxidation. Catalysts. doi: 10.3390/catal502060610.3390/catal5020606 ↗
33. Comotti M, Li W-C, Spliethoff B, Schüth F (2006) Support effect in high activity gold catalysts for CO oxidation. J Am Chem Soc 128:917–924. doi: 10.1021/ja056144110.1021/ja0561441 ↗
34. Trovarelli A (1996) Catalytic properties of ceria and CeO2-containing materials. Catal Rev 38:439–520. doi: 10.1080/0161494960800646410.1080/01614949608006464 ↗
35. Sutradhar N, Sinhamahapatra A, Pahari S et al (2011) Facile low-temperature synthesis of ceria and samarium-doped ceria nanoparticles and catalytic allylic oxidation of cyclohexene. J Phys Chem C 115:7628–7637. doi: 10.1021/jp200645q10.1021/jp200645q ↗
36. Silva AGM, Rodrigues TS, Dias A et al (2014) Ce1-xSmxO1.9-[small delta] nanoparticles obtained by microwave-assisted hydrothermal processing: an efficient application for catalytic oxidation of [small alpha]-bisabolol. Catal Sci Technol 4:814–821. doi: 10.1039/C3CY00788J10.1039/C3CY00788J ↗
37. Siang J-Y, Lee C-C, Wang C-H et al (2010) Hydrogen production from steam reforming of ethanol using a ceria-supported iridium catalyst: effect of different ceria supports. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:3456–3462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.06710.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.067 ↗
38. Mandal S, Bando KK, Santra C et al (2013) Sm–CeO2 supported gold nanoparticle catalyst for benzyl alcohol oxidation using molecular O2. Appl Catal A Gen 452:94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2012.11.03010.1016/j.apcata.2012.11.030 ↗
39. Yao HC, Yao YFY (1984) Ceria in automotive exhaust catalysts. J Catal 86:254–265. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(84)90371-310.1016/0021-9517(84)90371-3 ↗
40. Osojnik Črnivec IG, Djinović P, Erjavec B, Pintar A (2012) Effect of synthesis parameters on morphology and activity of bimetallic catalysts in CO2–CH4 reforming. Chem Eng J 207–208:299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.10710.1016/j.cej.2012.06.107 ↗
41. Aneggi E, Wiater D, de Leitenburg C et al (2014) Shape-dependent activity of ceria in soot combustion. ACS Catal 4:172–181. doi: 10.1021/cs400850r10.1021/cs400850r ↗
42. Zhu H, Qin Z, Shan W et al (2004) Pd/CeO2–TiO2 catalyst for CO oxidation at low temperature: a TPR study with H2 and CO as reducing agents. J Catal 225:267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.04.00610.1016/j.jcat.2004.04.006 ↗
43. Watanabe S, Ma X, Song C (2009) Characterization of structural and surface properties of nanocrystalline TiO2–CeO2 mixed oxides by XRD, XPS, TPR, and TPD. J Phys Chem C 113:14249–14257. doi: 10.1021/jp811030910.1021/jp8110309 ↗
44. Wang JA, Cuan A, Salmones J et al (2004) Studies of sol–gel TiO2 and Pt/TiO2 catalysts for NO reduction by CO in an oxygen-rich condition. Appl Surf Sci 230:94–105. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.02.05710.1016/j.apsusc.2004.02.057 ↗
45. Song I, Youn S, Lee H, Kim DH (2016) CeO2–TiO2 catalyst prepared by physical mixing for NH3 selective catalytic reduction: evidence about the migration of sulfates from TiO2 to CeO2 via simple calcination. Korean J Chem Eng 33:2547–2554. doi: 10.1007/s11814-016-0112-810.1007/s11814-016-0112-8 ↗
46. Kim SS, Park KH, Hong SC (2013) A study of the selectivity of the reverse water–gas-shift reaction over Pt/TiO2 catalysts. Fuel Process Technol 108:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.04.00310.1016/j.fuproc.2012.04.003 ↗
47. Kim SS, Lee HH, Hong SC (2012) A study on the effect of support’s reducibility on the reverse water–gas shift reaction over Pt catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 423–424:100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2012.02.02110.1016/j.apcata.2012.02.021 ↗
48. Upadhyay PR, Srivastava V (2016) Selective hydrogenation of CO2 gas to formic acid over nanostructured Ru–TiO2 catalysts. RSC Adv 6:42297–42306. doi: 10.1039/C6RA03660K10.1039/C6RA03660K ↗
49. Martínez-Huerta MV, Fierro JLG, Bañares MA (2009) Monitoring the states of vanadium oxide during the transformation of TiO2 anatase-to-rutile under reactive environments: H2 reduction and oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane. Catal Commun 11:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2009.08.00210.1016/j.catcom.2009.08.002 ↗
50. Liu J, Sun Q, Fu Y, Shen J (2009) Preparation and characterization of mesoporous VOx–TiO2 complex oxides for the selective oxidation of methanol to dimethoxymethane. J Colloid Interface Sci 335:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.02710.1016/j.jcis.2009.03.027 ↗
51. Li H, Wu S, Li L et al (2015) CuO–CeO2/TiO2 catalyst for simultaneous NO reduction and Hg0 oxidation at low temperatures. Catal Sci Technol 5:5129–5138. doi: 10.1039/C5CY00794A10.1039/C5CY00794A ↗
52. Kim SS, Lee HH, Hong SC (2012) The effect of the morphological characteristics of TiO2 supports on the reverse water–gas shift reaction over Pt/TiO2 catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 119–120:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.02.02310.1016/j.apcatb.2012.02.023 ↗
53. Duprez D, Descorme C, Birchem T, Rohart E (2001) Oxygen storage and mobility on model three-way catalysts. Top Catal 16:49–56. doi: 10.1023/A:101662261252110.1023/A:1016622612521 ↗
54. He H, Dai HX, Au CT (2004) Defective structure, oxygen mobility, oxygen storage capacity, and redox properties of RE-based (RE = Ce, Pr) solid solutions. Catal Today 90:245–254. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.04.03310.1016/j.cattod.2004.04.033 ↗
55. Priya NS, Somayaji C, Kanagaraj S (2014) Optimization of Ce0.6Zr0.4−x Al1.3x O2 solid solution based on oxygen storage capacity. J Nanoparticle Res 16:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-2214-010.1007/s11051-013-2214-0 ↗
56. Pan X, Yang M-Q, Fu X et al (2013) Defective TiO2 with oxygen vacancies: synthesis, properties and photocatalytic applications. Nanoscale 5:3601–3614. doi: 10.1039/C3NR00476G10.1039/C3NR00476G ↗
57. Sun Y, Gao S, Lei F, Xie Y (2015) Atomically-thin two-dimensional sheets for understanding active sites in catalysis. Chem Soc Rev 44:623–636. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00236A10.1039/C4CS00236A ↗
58. Pacchioni G (2003) Oxygen vacancy: the invisible agent on oxide surfaces. ChemPhysChem 4:1041–1047. doi: 10.1002/cphc.20030083510.1002/cphc.200300835 ↗
59. Swamy V, Kuznetsov A, Dubrovinsky LS et al (2005) Finite-size and pressure effects on the Raman spectrum of nanocrystalline anatase TiO2. Phys Rev B 71:18430210.1103/PhysRevB.71.184302 ↗
60. Tian F, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Pan C (2012) Raman spectroscopy: a new approach to measure the percentage of anatase TiO2 exposed (001) facets. J Phys Chem C 116:7515–7519. doi: 10.1021/jp301256h10.1021/jp301256h ↗
61. Teng M, Luo L, Yang X (2009) Synthesis of mesoporous Ce1−x Zr x O2 (x = 0.2–0.5) and catalytic properties of CuO based catalysts. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 119:158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.01910.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.019 ↗
62. Reddy BM, Lakshmanan P, Khan A (2004) Investigation of surface structures of dispersed V2O5 on CeO2–SiO2, CeO2–TiO2, and CeO2–ZrO2 mixed oxides by XRD, Raman, and XPS techniques. J Phys Chem B 108:16855–16863. doi: 10.1021/jp047217q10.1021/jp047217q ↗
63. Nakajima A, Yoshihara A, Ishigame M (1994) Defect-induced Raman spectra in doped CeO2. Phys Rev B 50:13297–1330710.1103/PhysRevB.50.13297 ↗
64. Weber WH, Hass KC, McBride JR (1993) Raman study of CeO2: second-order scattering, lattice dynamics, and particle-size effects. Phys Rev B 48:178–18510.1103/PhysRevB.48.178 ↗
65. Petallidou KC, Efstathiou AM (2013) Low-temperature water-gas shift on Pt/Ce1−x La x O2−δ: effect of Ce/La ratio. Appl Catal B Environ 140:333–347. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.00710.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.007 ↗
66. Chen S-Y, Chen R-J, Lee W et al (2014) Spectromicroscopic evidence of interstitial and substitutional dopants in association with oxygen vacancies in Sm-doped ceria nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:3274–3281. doi: 10.1039/C3CP54613F10.1039/C3CP54613F ↗
67. Gao Y, Wang W, Chang S, Huang W (2013) Morphology effect of CeO2 support in the preparation, metal-support interaction, and catalytic performance of Pt/CeO2 catalysts. ChemCatChem 5:3610–3620. doi: 10.1002/cctc.20130070910.1002/cctc.201300709 ↗
68. Monte M, Gamarra D, López Cámara A et al (2014) Preferential oxidation of CO in excess H2 over CuO/CeO2 catalysts: performance as a function of the copper coverage and exposed face present in the CeO2 support. Catal Today 229:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.07810.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.078 ↗
69. Zheng Y-L, Mao D-S, Sun S-S, Fu G-Y (2016) Solvothermal synthesis in ethylene glycol and catalytic activity for CO oxidation of CuO/CeO2 catalysts. J Mater Sci 51:917–925. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9420-310.1007/s10853-015-9420-3 ↗
70. He B, Zhao Q, Zeng Z et al (2015) Effect of hydrothermal reaction time and calcination temperature on properties of Au@CeO2 core–shell catalyst for CO oxidation at low temperature. J Mater Sci 50:6339–6348. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9181-z10.1007/s10853-015-9181-z ↗
71. Wu K, Zhou L, Jia C-J et al (2017) Pt-embedded-CeO2 hollow spheres for enhancing CO oxidation performance. Mater Chem Front. doi: 10.1039/C7QM00244K10.1039/C7QM00244K ↗
72. Morfin F, Nguyen T-S, Rousset J-L, Piccolo L (2016) Synergy between hydrogen and ceria in Pt-catalyzed CO oxidation: an investigation on Pt–CeO2 catalysts synthesized by solution combustion. Appl Catal B Environ 197:2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.05610.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.056 ↗
73. McCrea KR, Parker JS, Somorjai GA (2002) The role of carbon deposition from co dissociation on platinum crystal surfaces during catalytic CO oxidation: effects on turnover rate, ignition temperature, and vibrational spectra. J Phys Chem B 106:10854–10863. doi: 10.1021/jp014679k10.1021/jp014679k ↗
74. Li N, Chen Q-Y, Luo L-F et al (2013) Kinetic study and the effect of particle size on low temperature CO oxidation over Pt/TiO2 catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 142–143:523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.05.06810.1016/j.apcatb.2013.05.068 ↗
75. Taira K, Nakao K, Suzuki K, Einaga H (2016) SOx tolerant Pt/TiO2 catalysts for CO oxidation and the effect of TiO2 supports on catalytic activity. Environ Sci Technol 50:9773–9780. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b0165210.1021/acs.est.6b01652 ↗
76. Mergler YJ, van Aalst A, van Delft J, Nieuwenhuys BE (1996) CO oxidation over promoted Pt catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 10:245–261. doi: 10.1016/S0926-3373(96)00017-310.1016/S0926-3373(96)00017-3 ↗
77. Casapu M, Fischer A, Gänzler A et al (2016) The origin of the normal and inverse hysteresis behavior during CO oxidation over Pt/Al2O3. ACS Catal. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b0270910.1021/acscatal.6b02709 ↗
78. Bera P, Gayen A, Hegde MS et al (2003) Promoting effect of CeO2 in combustion synthesized Pt/CeO2 catalyst for CO oxidation. J Phys Chem B 107:6122–6130. doi: 10.1021/jp022132f10.1021/jp022132f ↗