Computational study of the effect of core–skin structure on the mechanical properties of carbon nanofibers
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of the core–skin structure on the mechanical properties of carbon nanofibers is investigated in large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of tensile deformation of carbon nanofibers with the core–skin and homogeneous structures. Contrary to an established notion of the deleterious effect of the skin layer on the strength of carbon fibers, the presence of a high-quality skin layer is found to increase both the Young’s modulus and tensile strength of the nanofiber. A detailed analysis of the fracture process indicates that the nanofiber strengthening is related to the ability of skin layer to suppress crack nucleation at the core–skin interface. The computational predictions suggest that the design of new approaches to carbon fiber manufacturing and processing leading to the generation of a high-quality skin layer while avoiding the introduction of structural defects at the core–skin interface may yield a significant enhancement of the mechanical properties of carbon fibers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Islam MS, Deng Y, Tong L, Faisal SN, Roy AK, Minett AI, Gomes VG (2016) Grafting carbon nanotubes directly onto carbon fibers for superior mechanical stability: towards next generation aerospace composites and energy storage applications. Carbon 96:701–71010.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.002 ↗
2. Xu Z, Gao C (2015) Graphene fiber: a new trend in carbon fibers. Mater Today 18:480–49210.1016/j.mattod.2015.06.009 ↗
3. Frank E, Steudle LM, Ingildeev D, Spörl JM, Buchmeiser MR (2014) Carbon fibers: precursor systems, processing, structure, and properties. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:5262–529810.1002/anie.201306129 ↗
4. Jacob A (2014) Carbon fibre and cars—2013 in review. Reinf Plast 58:18–1910.1016/S0034-3617(14)70036-0 ↗
5. Meng F, McKechnie J, Turner T, Wong KH, Pickering SJ (2017) Environmental aspects of use of recycled carbon fiber composites in automotive applications. Environ Sci Technol 51:12727–1273610.1021/acs.est.7b04069 ↗
6. Knibbs RH (1971) The use of polarized light microscopy in examining the structure of carbon fibres. J Microsc 94:273–28110.1111/j.1365-2818.1971.tb02377.x ↗
7. Bennett SC, Johnson DJ (1979) Electron microscope studies of structural heterogeneity in PAN-based carbon fibers. Carbon 17:25–3910.1016/0008-6223(79)90067-8 ↗
8. Edit DD (1998) The effect of processing on the structure and properties of carbon fibers. Carbon 36:345–36210.1016/S0008-6223(97)00185-1 ↗
9. Kobayashi T, Sumiya K, Fukuba Y, Fujie M, Takahagi T, Tashiro K (2011) Structural heterogeneity and stress distribution in carbon fiber monofilament as revealed by synchrotron micro-beam X-ray scattering and micro-Raman spectral measurements. Carbon 49:1646–165210.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.048 ↗
10. Dumanh AG, Windle AH (2012) Carbon fibres from cellulosic precursors: a review. J Mater Sci 47:4236–4250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6081-810.1007/s10853-011-6081-8 ↗
11. Sha Y, Yang W, Li S, Yao L, Li H, Cheng L, Yan H, Cao W, Tan J (2018) Laser induced graphitization of PAN-based carbon fibers. RCS Adv 8:11543–11550
12. Loidl D, Paris O, Rennhofer H, Müller M, Peterlik H (2007) Skin-core structure and bimodal Weibull distribution of the strength of carbon fibers. Carbon 45:2801–280510.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.011 ↗
13. Liu F, Wang H, Xue L, Fan L, Zhu Z (2008) Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of PAN-based carbon fibers during high-temperature graphitization. J Mater Sci 43:4316–4322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2633-y10.1007/s10853-008-2633-y ↗
14. Steiner SA III, Li R, Wardle BL (2013) Circumventing the mechanochemical origins of strength loss in the synthesis of hierarchical carbon fibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:4892–490310.1021/am4006385 ↗
15. Gardea F, Naraghi M, Lagoudas D (2014) Effect of thermal interface on heat flow in carbon nanofiber composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1061–107210.1021/am4046102 ↗
16. Varshney V, Roy AK, Baur JW (2015) Modeling the role of bulk and surface characteristics of carbon fiber on thermal conductance across the carbon-fiber/matrix interface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:26674–2668310.1021/acsami.5b08591 ↗
17. Liu X, Zhu C, Guo J, Liu Q, Dong H, Gu Y, Liu R, Zhao N, Zhang Z, Xu J (2014) Nanoscale dynamic mechanical imaging of the skin-core difference: From PAN precursors to carbon fibers. Mater Lett 128:417–42010.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.176 ↗
18. Huang Y, Young RJ (1995) Effect of fiber microstructure upon the modulus of PAN- and pitch-based carbon fibres. Carbon 33:97–10710.1016/0008-6223(94)00109-D ↗
19. Chae HG, Newcomb BA, Gulgunje PV, Liu Y, Gupta KK, Kamath MG, Lyons KM, Ghoshal S, Pramanik C, Giannuzzi L, Sahin K, Chasiotis I, Kumar S (2015) High strength and high modulus carbon fibers. Carbon 93:81–8710.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.016 ↗
20. Liu J, Yue Z, Fong H (2009) Continuous nanoscale carbon fibers with superior mechanical strength. Small 5:536–54210.1002/smll.200801440 ↗
21. Arshad SN, Naraghi M, Chasiotis I (2011) Strong carbon nanofibers from electrospun polyacrylonitrile. Carbon 49:1710–171910.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.056 ↗
22. Chawla S, Cai J, Naraghi M (2017) Mechanical tests on individual carbon nanofibers reveals the strong effect of graphitic alignment achieved via precursor hot-drawing. Carbon 117:208–21910.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.095 ↗
23. Cai J, Naraghi M (2018) Non-intertwined graphitic domains leads to super strong and tough continuous 1D nanostructures. Carbon 137:242–25110.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.030 ↗
24. Zussman E, Chen X, Ding W, Calabri L, Dikin DA, Quintana JP, Ruoff RS (2005) Mechanical and structural characterization of electrospun PAN-derived carbon nanofibers. Carbon 43:2175–218510.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.031 ↗
25. Saha B, Furmanchuk A, Dzenis Y, Schatz GC (2015) Multi-step mechanism of carbonization in templated polyacrylonitrile derived fibers: ReaxFF model uncovers origins of graphite alignment. Carbon 94:694–70410.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.048 ↗
26. Desai S, Li C, Shen T, Strachan A (2017) Molecular modeling of the microstructure evolution during carbon fiber processing. J Chem Phys 147:22470510.1063/1.5000911 ↗
27. Joshi K, Arefev MI, Zhigilei LV (2019) Generation and characterization of carbon fiber microstructure in atomistic simulations. Carbon 152:396–40810.1016/j.carbon.2019.06.014 ↗
28. Zhu J, Gao Z, Kowalik M, Joshi K, Ashraf CM, Arefev MI, Schwab Y, Bumgardner C, Brown K, Burden DE, Zhang L, Klett JW, Zhigilei LV, van Duin ACT, Li X (2019) Unveiling carbon ring structure formation mechanisms in polyacrylonitrile-derived carbon fibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:42288–4229710.1021/acsami.9b15833 ↗
29. Kowalik M, Ashraf C, Damirchi B, Akbarian D, Rajabpour S, van Duin ACT (2019) Atomistic scale analysis of the carbonization process for C/H/O/N-based polymers with the ReaxFF reactive force field. J Phys Chem B 123:5357–536710.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04298 ↗
30. Gao Z, Zhu J, Rajabpour S, Joshi K, Kowalik M, Croom B, Schwab Y, Zhang L, Bumgardner C, Brown KR, Burden D, Klett JW, van Duin ACT, Zhigilei LV, Li X (2020) Graphene reinforced carbon fibers. Sci Adv 6:eaaz4191
31. Mao Q, Rajabpour S, Kowalik M, van Duin ACT (2020) Predicting cost-effective carbon fiber precursors: unraveling the functionalities of oxygen and nitrogen-containing groups during carbonization from ReaxFF simulations. Carbon 159:25–3610.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.008 ↗
32. Shi L, Sessim M, Tonks MR, Phillpot SR (2021) Generation and characterization of an improved carbon fiber model by molecular dynamics. Carbon 173:232–24410.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.011 ↗
33. Shi L, Sessim M, Tonks MR, Phillpot S (2020) Modeling carbon fiber oxidation under high temperature by ReaxFF based molecular dynamics simulation. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, AIAA paper 2020–048410.2514/6.2020-0484 ↗
34. Zhu C, Liu X, Yu X, Zhao N, Liu J, Xu J (2012) A small-angle X-ray scattering study and molecular dynamics simulation of microvoid evolution during the tensile deformation of carbon fibers. Carbon 50:235–24310.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.040 ↗
35. Ito A, Okamoto S (2013) Using molecular dynamics to assess mechanical properties of PAN-based carbon fibers comprising imperfect crystals with amorphous structures. Int J Mech Aero Indus Mechatron Manuf Eng 7:1839–1845
36. Penev ES, Artyukhov VI, Yakobson BI (2015) Basic structural units in carbon fibers: atomistic models and tensile behavior. Carbon 85:72–7810.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.067 ↗
37. Gupta N, Artyukhov VI, Penev ES, Yakobson BI (2016) Carbonization with misfusion: fundamental limits of carbon-fiber strength revisited. Adv Mater 28:10317–1032210.1002/adma.201603009 ↗
38. Bashir Z (1991) A critical review of the stabilisation of polyacrylonitrile. Carbon 29:1081–109010.1016/0008-6223(91)90024-D ↗
39. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graphics 14:33–3810.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
40. O’Connor TC, Andzelm J, Robbins MO (2015) AIREBO-M: a reactive model for hydrocarbons at extreme pressures. J Chem Phys 142:02490310.1063/1.4905549 ↗
41. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
42. Jensen BD, Wise KE, Odegard GM (2015) The effect of time step, thermostat, and strain rate on ReaxFF simulations of mechanical failure in diamond, graphene, and carbon nanotube. J Comput Chem 36:1587–159610.1002/jcc.23970 ↗
43. Plimpton SJ, Thompson AP (2012) Computational aspects of many-body potentials. MRS Bull 37:513–52110.1557/mrs.2012.96 ↗
44. Senftle TP, Hong S, Islam MM, Kylasa SB, Zheng Y, Shin YK, Junkermeier C, Engel-Herbert R, Janik MJ, Aktulga HM, Verstraelen T, Grama A, van Duin ACT (2016) The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications, and future directions. Nat Comput Mater 2:15011
45. Srinivasan SG, van Duin ACT, Ganesh P (2015) Development of a ReaxFF potential for carbon condensed phases and its application to the thermal fragmentation of a large fullerene. J Phys Chem A 119:571–58010.1021/jp510274e ↗
46. Jensen BD, Wise KE, Odegard GM (2015) Simulation of the elastic and ultimate tensile properties of diamond, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and amorphous carbon using a revised ReaxFF parameterization. J Phys Chem A 119:9710–972110.1021/acs.jpca.5b05889 ↗
47. Ni Z, Bu H, Zou M, Yi H, Bi K, Chen Y (2010) Anisotropic mechanical properties of graphene sheets from molecular dynamics. Phys B 405:1301–130610.1016/j.physb.2009.11.071 ↗
48. Mylvaganam K, Zhang LC (2004) Important issues in a molecular dynamics simulation for characterizing the mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 42:2025–203210.1016/j.carbon.2004.04.004 ↗
49. Lebedeva IV, Minkin AS, Popov AM, Knizhnik AA (2019) Elastic constants of graphene: comparison of empirical potentials and DFT calculations. Phys E 108:326–33810.1016/j.physe.2018.11.025 ↗
50. Kok ZKJ, Wong CH (2016) Molecular dynamics simulation studies of mechanical properties of different carbon nanotube systems. Mol Simul 42:1274–128010.1080/08927022.2016.1185790 ↗
51. Deb Nath SK, Kim S-G (2014) Study of the nanomechanics of CNTs under tension by molecular dynamics simulation using different potentials. ISRN Condens Matter Phys 2014:60601710.1155/2014/606017 ↗
52. Van Lier G, Van Alsenoy C, Van Doren V, Geerlings P (2000) Ab initio study of the elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes and graphene. Chem Phys Lett 326:181–18510.1016/S0009-2614(00)00764-8 ↗
53. Kudin KN, Scuseria GE, Yakobson BI (2001) C2F, BN, and C nanoshell elasticity from ab initio computations. Phys Rev B 64:23540610.1103/PhysRevB.64.235406 ↗
54. Liu F, Ming P, Li J (2007) Ab initio calculation of ideal strength and phonon instability of graphene under tension. Phys Rev B 76:064120
55. Ozcan S, Vautard F, Naskar AK (2014) Designing the structure of carbon fibers for optimal mechanical properties. in: Polymer Precursor-Derived Carbon. American Chemical Society, 2014, Ch. 10, pp. 215–23210.1021/bk-2014-1173.ch010 ↗
56. Liu YD, Chae HG, Kumar S (2011) Gel-spun carbon nanotubes/polyacrylonitrile composite fibers. Part III: effect of stabilization conditions on carbon fiber properties. Carbon 49:4487–449610.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.045 ↗
57. Hua Z, Zhong YJ, Li DF (2007) Pores in PAN-based carbon fiber and effects of pore defects on mechanical properties. Mater Sci Forum 546–549:1665–166810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.546-549.1665 ↗
58. Lu J, Li W, Kang H, Feng L, Xu J, Liu R (2020) Microstructure and properties of polyacrylonitrile based carbon fibers. Polym Test 81:106267
59. Thünemann AF, Ruland W (2000) Microvoids in polyacrylonitrile fibers: a small-angle X-ray scattering study. Macromolecules 33:1848–185210.1021/ma991427x ↗
60. Fontana J, Palffy-Muhoray P (2020) St. Petersburg paradox and failure probability. Phys Rev Lett 124:24550110.1103/PhysRevLett.124.245501 ↗
61. Wicks BJ, Coyle RA (1976) Microstructural inhomogeneity in carbon fibres. J Mater Sci 11:376–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055144910.1007/BF00551449 ↗