Flexible Cube-Shaped PTFE-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Improving Wind Energy Harvesting Output
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a newly developed wind-driven triboelectric nanogenerator (WD-TENG) using flexible cube polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to improve harvesting energy in four directions. The flexible cube-shaped PTFE was made with a deformable surface that allowed for a larger contact area during triboelectricity. When the wind was introduced into the cylinder structure, the cube-shaped PTFEs were rotated by the force of the wind and generated electricity through contact and separation with aluminum (Al) attached to the inner wall of the cylinder. As a result, the flexible cube-shaped PTFE-based WD-TENG increased the output performance by up to 25.1% compared with the WD-TENG using the stiff cube-shaped PTFEs. It was observed that the output value exhibited a linear relationship with respect to changes in wind speed in both cube types. The number of illuminated LEDs demonstrated that the wind, applied from four different directions, yielded comparable power outputs regardless of the direction of wind.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Chonnam University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
Automotive Materials & Components R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, 6, Cheomdangwagi-ro 208beon-gil, Buk-gu, Gwangju 31056, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Institute of Industrial Technology
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.00810.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.01010.1016/j.rser.2015.11.010 ↗
3. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.13810.1038/nenergy.2016.138 ↗
4. 10.1088/0957-0233/25/1/01200210.1088/0957-0233/25/1/012002 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.486913010.1063/1.4869130 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12541-013-0226-410.1007/s12541-013-0226-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.00410.1016/j.rser.2011.12.004 ↗
8. Brulle, R. V. Feasibility investigation of the giromill for generation of electrical power; McDonnell Aircraft Co.: St. Louis, MO (USA), 1975, 77, 11536.10.2172/7325479 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.10396910.1016/j.jweia.2019.103969 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0715710.1021/acsnano.5b07157 ↗
11. 10.1007/s40684-022-00424-010.1007/s40684-022-00424-0 ↗
12. 10.1515/ehs-2016-002310.1515/ehs-2016-0023 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20200444610.1002/adfm.202004446 ↗
14. 10.1002/ese3.48910.1002/ese3.489 ↗
15. Carandell M. · 2019 · 1
16. 10.1029/2004JD00546210.1029/2004JD005462 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.01710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.017 ↗
18. 10.1002/aenm.20160152910.1002/aenm.201601529 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10662910.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106629 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0238410.1021/acsnano.6b02384 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.9b0591510.1021/acsami.9b05915 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.05210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.052 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.eml.2017.07.00510.1016/j.eml.2017.07.005 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20220423910.1002/aenm.202204239 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10437910.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104379 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.04610.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.046 ↗
27. 10.3390/nano1220359510.3390/nano12203595 ↗
28. 10.1007/s12274-021-3968-910.1007/s12274-021-3968-9 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0257510.1021/acsnano.5b02575 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10745310.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107453 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10447710.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104477 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11100510.1016/j.matdes.2022.111005 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10638210.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106382 ↗