Multifunctional Ag/polymer composite nanospheres for drug delivery and cell imaging
Source abstract
Abstract
Judicious combination of noble metals and smart gels makes cell imaging and drug delivery into one, which provides support for the integrated technology of diagnosis and treatment. In this work, the Ag nanoparticles (Ag NPs)/poly-(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate) core–shell multifunctional composite nanosphere (Ag–p (NIPAM-co-DMAEMA)) was successfully synthesized by two-step one-pot method. The composite nanospheres had a particle size of approximately 200 nm and possessed multiple sensitive release properties, biocompatibility, and pharmacological activity. Importantly, it was found that cancer cells (CT-26) uptake more hybrid gels and exhibited stronger fluorescence, compared to normal cells (COS-7). This indicated that the hybrid gel had certain specificity and could be used for the imaging of cancer cells. Multifunctional composite nanospheres with optical and therapeutic functionality constructed by a simple method offered broad opportunities for cancer treatment and cell imaging.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. He L, Pang K, Liu W et al (2019) Core–shell noble-metal@ zeolitic-imidazolate-framework nanocarriers with high cancer treatment efficiency in vitro. J Mater Chem B 7:1050–1055. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TB03318H10.1039/C8TB03318H ↗
2. Tian X, Zhang L, Yang M, Bai L, Dai Y, Yu Z, Pan Y (2018) Functional magnetic hybrid nanomaterials for biomedical diagnosis and treatment. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 10:1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.147610.1002/wnan.1476 ↗
3. Malekzad H, Zangabad PS, Mohammadi H et al (2018) Noble metal nanostructures in optical biosensors: basics, and their introduction to anti-doping detection. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 100:116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.12.00610.1016/j.trac.2017.12.006 ↗
4. Lyu Y, Fang Y, Miao Q, Zhen X, Ding D, Pu K (2016) Intraparticle molecular orbital engineering of semiconducting polymer nanoparticles as amplified theranostics for in vivo photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 10:4472–4481. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b0016810.1021/acsnano.6b00168 ↗
5. Wu W, Shen J, Banerjee P, Zhou S (2010) Core–shell hybrid nanogels for integration of optical temperature-sensing, targeted tumor cell imaging, and combined chemo-photothermal treatment. Biomaterials 31:7555–7566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.03010.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.030 ↗
6. Boisselier E, Astruc D (2009) Gold nanoparticles in nanomedicine: preparations, imaging, diagnostics, therapies and toxicity. Chem Soc Rev 38:1759–1782. https://doi.org/10.1039/B806051G10.1039/B806051G ↗
7. Yuan P, Lee YH, Gnanasammandhan MK, Guan Z, Zhang Y, Xu Q (2012) Plasmon enhanced upconversion luminescence of NaYF4: Yb, Er@ SiO2@ Ag core–shell nanocomposites for cell imaging. Nanoscale 4:5132–5137. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR31241G10.1039/C2NR31241G ↗
8. Wu W, Zhou T, Berliner A, Banerjee P, Zhou S (2010) Smart core-shell hybrid nanogels with Ag nanoparticle core for cancer cell imaging and gel shell for pH-regulated drug delivery. Chem Mat 22:1966–1976. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm903357q10.1021/cm903357q ↗
9. Paramasivam G, Kayambu N, Rabel AM, Sundramoorthy AK, Sundaramurthy A (2017) Anisotropic noble metal nanoparticles: synthesis, surface functionalization and applications in biosensing, bioimaging, drug delivery and theranostics. Acta Biomater 49:45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.06610.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.066 ↗
10. Ragelle H, Danhier F, Preat V, Langer R, Anderson DG (2017) Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems: a commercial and regulatory outlook as the field matures. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 14:851–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2016.124418710.1080/17425247.2016.1244187 ↗
11. Hill LK, Frezzo JA, Katyal P et al (2019) Protein-engineered nanoscale micelles for dynamic 19F magnetic resonance and therapeutic drug delivery. ACS Nano 13:2969–2985. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b0748110.1021/acsnano.8b07481 ↗
12. Wang J, He H, Cooper RC, Gui Q, Yamg H (2019) Drug-conjugated dendrimer hydrogel enables sustained drug release via a self-cleaving mechanism. Mol Pharm 16:1874–1880. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b0120710.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01207 ↗
13. Pan L, Liu J, He Q, Shi J (2014) MSN-mediated sequential vascular-to-cell nuclear-targeted drug delivery for efficient tumor regression. Adv Mater 26:6742–6748. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20140275210.1002/adma.201402752 ↗
14. Llopis-Lorente A, Diez P, Delatorre C et al (2017) Enzyme-controlled nanodevice for acetylcholine-triggered cargo delivery based on Janus Au–mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem Eur J 23:4276–4281. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20170060310.1002/chem.201700603 ↗
15. Gao L, Zabihi F, Ehrmann S, Hedtrich S, Haag R (2019) Supramolecular nanogels fabricated via host-guest molecular recognition as penetration enhancer for dermal drug delivery. J Control Rel 300:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.02.01110.1016/j.jconrel.2019.02.011 ↗
16. Hu H, Wang C, Zhang R, Xiao C, Lai C, Li Z, Xu D (2020) Branched worm-like nanoparticles featured with programmed drug release for synergistic castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy. J Mater Sci 55:6992–7008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04495-910.1007/s10853-020-04495-9 ↗
17. Karimi M, Eslami M, Sahandi-Zangabad P et al (2016) pH-Sensitive stimulus-responsive nanocarriers for targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 8:696–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.138910.1002/wnan.1389 ↗
18. Lin T, Zhao P, Jiang Y et al (2016) Blood–brain-barrier-penetrating albumin nanoparticles for biomimetic drug delivery via albumin-binding protein pathways for antiglioma therapy. ACS Nano 10:9999–10012. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b0426810.1021/acsnano.6b04268 ↗
19. Karimi M, Ghasemi A, Zangabad PS et al (2016) Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems. Chem Soc Rev 45:1457–1501. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00798D10.1039/C5CS00798D ↗
20. Wang X, Lin W, Zhang W, Li C, Sun T, Chen G, Xie Z (2019) Amphiphilic redox-sensitive NIR BODIPY nanoparticles for dual-mode imaging and photothermal therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci 536:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.05110.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.051 ↗
21. Choi GE, Kang MS, Kim YJ, Yoon JJ, Jeong YI (2019) Magnetically responsive drug delivery using doxorubicin and iron oxide nanoparticle-incorporated lipocomplexes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19:675–679. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2019.1591010.1166/jnn.2019.15910 ↗
22. Ameen D, Michniak-Kohn B (2019) Development and in vitro evaluation of pressure sensitive adhesive patch for the transdermal delivery of galantamine: effect of penetration enhancers and crystallization inhibition. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 139:262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.04.00810.1016/j.ejpb.2019.04.008 ↗
23. Birajdar RP, Patil SB, Alange VV, Kulkarni RV (2019) Electro-responsive polyacrylamide-grafted-gum ghatti copolymer for transdermal drug delivery application. J Macromol Sci Part A 56:306–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2019.157453910.1080/10601325.2019.1574539 ↗
24. Deng K, Zhao X, Liu F, Peng J, Wei H (2019) Synthesis of thermo-sensitive conjugated triblock copolymers by sequential click couplings for drug delivery and cell imaging. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5:3419–3428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0066410.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00664 ↗
25. Strachota B, Strachota A, Šlouf M, Brus J, Cimrova V (2019) Monolithic intercalated PNIPAm/starch hydrogels with very fast and extensive one-way volume and swelling responses to temperature and pH: prospective actuators and drug release systems. Soft Matter 15:752–769. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM02153H10.1039/C8SM02153H ↗
26. Cong Y, Li Q, Chen M, Wu L (2017) Synthesis of dual-stimuli-responsive microcontainers with two payloads in different storage spaces for preprogrammable release. Angew Chem Int Edit 56:3552–3556. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20161229110.1002/anie.201612291 ↗
27. Wang J, Cooper RC, He H, Li B, Yang H (2018) Polyamidoamine dendrimer microgels: hierarchical arrangement of dendrimers into micrometer domains with expanded structural features for programmable drug delivery and release. Macromolecule 51:6111–6118. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0100610.1021/acs.macromol.8b01006 ↗
28. Ji P, Zhou B, Zhan Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, He P (2017) Multistimulative nanogels with enhanced thermosensitivity for intracellular therapeutic delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:39143–39151. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0820910.1021/acsami.7b08209 ↗
29. Escalona GR, Sanchis J, Vicent MJ (2018) pH-Responsive polyacetal-protein conjugates designed for polymer masked-unmasked protein therapy (PUMPT). Macromol Biosci 18:1700302. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20170030210.1002/mabi.201700302 ↗
30. Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Concheiro A (2013) Bioinspired drug delivery systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol 24:1167–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.01310.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.013 ↗
31. Wu S, Huang X, Du X (2013) Glucose-and pH-responsive controlled release of cargo from protein-gated carbohydratefunctionalized mesoporous silica nanocontainers. Angew Chem Int Edit 52:5580–5584. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20130095810.1002/anie.201300958 ↗
32. Xue Y, Guan Y, Zheng A, Xiao H (2013) Amphoteric calix [8] arene-based complex for pH-triggered drug delivery. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces 101:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.06.02210.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.06.022 ↗
33. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P (2013) Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery. Nat Mater 12:991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat377610.1038/nmat3776 ↗
34. Wu W, Aiello M, Zhou T, Berliner A, Banerjee P, Zhou S (2010) In-situ immobilization of quantum dots in polysaccharide-based nanogels for integration of optical pH-sensing, tumor cell imaging, and drug delivery. Biomaterials 31:3023–3031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.011 ↗
35. Guo X, Cheng Y, Zhao X, Luo Y, Chen J, Yuan W (2018) Advances in redox-responsive drug delivery systems of tumor microenvironment. J Nanobiotechnol 16:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0398-210.1186/s12951-018-0398-2 ↗
36. Zhu Z, Gao N, Wang H, Sukhishvili SA (2013) Temperature-triggered on-demand drug release enabled by hydrogen-bonded multilayers of block copolymer micelles. J Control Release 171:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.06.03110.1016/j.jconrel.2013.06.031 ↗
37. Duan L, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Li Y, He P (2018) pH/redox/thermo-stimulative nanogels with enhanced thermosensitivity via incorporation of cationic and anionic components for anticancer drug delivery. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 67:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2017.132321510.1080/00914037.2017.1323215 ↗
38. Zhou D, Liu S, Hu Y et al (2020) Tumor-mediated shape-transformable nanogels with pH/redox/enzymatic sensitivity for anticancer therapy. J Mater Chem B 8:3801–3813. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TB00143K10.1039/D0TB00143K ↗
39. Han K, Lei Q, Wang SB et al (2015) Dual-stage-light-guided tumor inhibition by mitochondria-targeted photodynamic therapy. Adv Funct Mater 25:2961–2971. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20150059010.1002/adfm.201500590 ↗
40. Niu G, Yang Y, Zhang H et al (2009) Synthesis and characterization of acrylamide/N-vinylpyrrolidone copolymer with pendent thiol groups for ophthalmic applications. Acta Biomater 5:1056–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.01510.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.015 ↗
41. Schrand AM, Braydich-Stolle LK, Schlager JJ, Dai L, Hussain SM (2008) Can silver nanoparticles be useful as potential biological labels? Nanotechnology 19:235104. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/23/23510410.1088/0957-4484/19/23/235104 ↗
42. Kulkarni SA, Feng SS (2013) Effects of particle size and surface modification on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. Pharm Res 30:2512–2522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-012-0958-310.1007/s11095-012-0958-3 ↗
43. Sun H, Kabb CP, Sims MB, Sumerlin BS (2019) Architecture-transformable polymers: reshaping the future of stimuli-responsive polymers. Prog Polym Sci 89:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.00610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.006 ↗
44. Shi H, Qiu T, Ou-Yang HD et al (2019) ABA-type triblock copolymer micellar system with lower critical solution temperature-type sol-gel transition. J Colloid Interface Sci 545:220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.03910.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.039 ↗
45. Sundlevander M, Forsberg C, Wahren LK (2002) Normal oral, rectal, tympanic and axillary body temperature in adult men and women: a systematic literature review. Scand J Caring Sci 16:122–128. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00069.x10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00069.x ↗
46. Wang J, Zhang L, Peng F, Shi X, Leong DT (2018) Targeting endothelial cell junctions with negatively charged gold nanoparticles. Chem Mat 30:3759–3767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0084010.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00840 ↗
47. Liu Y, Song Z, Zheng N, Nagasaka K, Yin L, Cheng J (2018) Systemic siRNA delivery to tumors by cell-penetrating α-helical polypeptide-based metastable nanoparticles. Nanoscale 10:15339–15349. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR03976C10.1039/C8NR03976C ↗
48. Chaisiwamongkhol K, Batchelor-Mcauley C, Compton RG (2019) Optimising amperometric pH sensing in blood samples: an iridium oxide electrode for blood pH sensing. Analyst 144:1386–1393. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8AN02238K10.1039/C8AN02238K ↗
49. Dong B, Du S, Wang C et al (2019) Reversible self-assembly of nanoprobes in live cells for dynamic intracellular pH imaging. ACS Nano 13:1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b0705410.1021/acsnano.8b07054 ↗
50. Liu S, Li W, Gai S et al (2019) A smart tumor microenvironment responsive nanoplatform based on upconversion nanoparticles for efficient multimodal imaging guided therapy. Biomater Sci 7:951–962. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM01243A10.1039/C8BM01243A ↗
51. Xi T, Fan C, Feng X, Wan Z, Wang C, Chou L (2006) Cytotoxicity and altered c-myc gene expression by medical polyacrylamide hydrogel. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 78:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3061910.1002/jbm.a.30619 ↗
52. Nouri A, Castro R, Kairys V et al (2012) Insight into the role of N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) conjugation onto poly (ethylenimine): cell viability and gene transfection studies. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:2967–2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4753-910.1007/s10856-012-4753-9 ↗
53. Fullenkamp DE, Rivera JG, Gong YK, Lau KHA, He L, Varshney R, Messersmith PB et al (2012) Mussel-inspired silver-releasing antibacterial hydrogels. Biomaterials 33:3783–3791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.02710.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.027 ↗
54. Liao C, Li Y, Tjong SC (2019) Bactericidal and cytotoxic properties of silver nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 20(2):449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2002044910.3390/ijms20020449 ↗
55. Zhang Y, Wang F, Li M, Yu Z, Qi R, Ding J, Zhang Z, Chen X (2018) Self-stabilized hyaluronate nanogel for intracellular codelivery of doxorubicin and cisplatin to osteosarcoma. Adv Sci 5:1700821. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20170082110.1002/advs.201700821 ↗
56. Chen K, Cai H, Zhang H, Zhu H, Gu Z, Gong Q, Luo K (2019) Stimuli-responsive polymer–doxorubicin conjugate: antitumor mechanism and potential as nano-prodrug. Acta Biomater 84:339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.05010.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.050 ↗
57. He C, Hu Y, Yin L, Tang C, Yin C (2010) Effects of particle size and surface charge on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Biomaterials 31:3657–3666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.06510.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.065 ↗