journal article·2019-05

Magnetically sensitive nanocomposites based on the conductive shear-stiffening gel

Xiwen Fan, Sheng Wang, Shuaishuai Zhang, Yu Wang, Xinglong Gong

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper a novel multi-functional composite with high electrical conductivity and excellent magnetic field sensitivity was fabricated by embedding carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbonyl iron powders (CIPs) into shear-stiffening gel (STG). Oscillatory shear test demonstrated its excellent rheological properties. When the mass fractions of CNTs and CIPs were 1 wt% and 50 wt%, the increase in storage modulus (G′) reached 585% under 100 Hz oscillatory shear and 428% under 1.2 T magnetic flux density with respect to its initial state. The resistivity of this CNT–CIP–STG composite achieved 25 Ω m and showed strong dependence on the magnetic field. When the external magnetic flux density was 873 mT, the normalized electrical resistance response reached up to − 40.5%. Linearly increasing and step magnetic field was employed to study the electrical and mechanical behaviors of this CNT–CIP–STG composite. The instantaneous response and time effect were discussed. Interestingly, oscillatory shear showed limited influence on the electrical conductivity but notable enhancement on the sensitivity to magnetic field. A mechanic–electric coupling mechanism was proposed to illustrate enhancement of shear thickening effect and sensibility to magnetic field.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Micro and Nano Robotics · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Xu CH, Wang Y, Wu J, Song S, Cao S, Xuan SH, Jiang WQ, Gong XL (2017) Anti-impact response of Kevlar sandwich structure with silly putty core. Compos Sci Technol 153:168–17710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.019 ↗
2. He QY, Gong XL, Xuan SH, Jiang WQ, Chen Q (2015) Shear thickening of suspensions of porous silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 50(18):6041–6049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9151-510.1007/s10853-015-9151-5 ↗
3. Hogg PJ (2006) Perspectives-composites in armor. Science 314(5802):1100–110110.1126/science.1131118 ↗
4. Liang J, Zhang XH (2015) Rheological properties of SP in shock transmission application. J Mater Civil Eng 27(9):0401425010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001227 ↗
5. Lin XG, Guo F, Du CB, Yu GJ (2018) The mechanical properties of a novel STMR damper based on magnetorheological silly putty. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:2681461
6. Wang Y, Ding L, Zhao C, Wang S, Xuan S, Jiang H, Gong X (2018) A novel magnetorheological shear-stiffening elastomer with self-healing ability. Compos Sci Technol 168:303–31110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.019 ↗
7. Wagner HD, Lourie O, Zhou XF (1999) Macrofragmentation and microfragmentation phenomena in composite materials. Compos A 30(1):59–6610.1016/S1359-835X(98)00072-4 ↗
8. Zhou W, Cui K, Tian N, Liu D, Liu Y, Meng L, Li X, He J, Li L, Li X, Tian F (2013) Disentanglement decelerating flow-induced nucleation. Polymer 54(2):942–94710.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.074 ↗
9. Chattaraj S, Pant P, Nanavati H (2018) Inter-relationships between mechanical properties of glassy polymers from nanoindentation and uniaxial compression. Polymer 144:128–14110.1016/j.polymer.2018.04.040 ↗
10. Cross R (2012) Elastic and viscous properties of silly putty. Am J Phys 80(10):870–87510.1119/1.4732086 ↗
11. Tian TF, Li WH, Ding J, Alici G, Du H (2012) Study of shear-stiffened elastomers. Smart Mater Struct 21(12):12500910.1088/0964-1726/21/12/125009 ↗
12. Goertz MP, Zhu XY, Houston JE (2009) Temperature dependent relaxation of a “solid–liquid”. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 47(13):1285–129010.1002/polb.21721 ↗
13. Palmer RM, Green PC (2010) Energy absorbing material, U.S. Patent 7,794,827[P]
14. Alam R, Lightcap IV, Karwacki CJ, Kamat PV (2014) Sense and shoot: simultaneous detection and degradation of low-level contaminants using graphene-based smart material assembly. ACS Nano 8(7):7272–727810.1021/nn502336x ↗
15. Zambrzycki M, Fraczek-Szczypta A (2018) Conductive hybrid polymer composites based on recycled carbon fibres and carbon nanofillers. J Mater Sci 53(10):7403–7416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2062-510.1007/s10853-018-2062-5 ↗
16. Lee JS, Shin KY, Cheong OJ, Kim JH, Jang J (2015) Highly sensitive and multifunctional tactile sensor using free-standing ZnO/PVDF thin film with graphene electrodes for pressure and temperature monitoring. Sci Rep 5:788710.1038/srep07887 ↗
17. He S, Li H, Chen HL (2018) Preparation of light-sensitive polymer/graphene composite via molecular recognition by beta-cyclodextrin. J Mater Sci 53(20):14337–14349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2639-z10.1007/s10853-018-2639-z ↗
18. Zhou G, Wang W, Peng M (2018) Functionalized aramid nanofibers prepared by polymerization induced self-assembly for simultaneously reinforcing and toughening of epoxy and carbon fiber/epoxy multiscale composite. Compos Sci Technol 168:312–31910.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.013 ↗
19. Boland CS, Khan U, Ryan G, Barwich S, Charifou R, Harvey A, Backes C, Li Z, Ferreira MS, Mobius ME, Young RJ, Coleman JN (2016) Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene–polymer nanocomposites. Science 354(6317):1257–126010.1126/science.aag2879 ↗
20. Borin DY, Stepanov GV (2015) Elastomer with magneto- and electrorheological properties. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26(14):1893–189810.1177/1045389X15581521 ↗
21. Ge J, Yao HB, Wang X, Ye YD, Wang JL, Wu ZY, Liu JW, Fan FJ, Gao HL, Zhang CL, Yu SH (2013) Stretchable conductors based on silver nanowires: improved performance through a binary network design. Angew Chem Int Ed 52(6):1654–165910.1002/anie.201209596 ↗
22. Wang S, Xuan SH, Jiang WQ, Jiang WF, Yan L, Mao Y, Liu M, Gong XL (2015) Rate-dependent and self-healing conductive shear stiffening nanocomposite: a novel safe-guarding material with force sensitivity. J Mater Chem A 3(39):19790–1979910.1039/C5TA06169E ↗
23. Wang S, Jiang WQ, Jiang WF, Ye F, Mao Y, Xuan SH, Gong XL (2014) Multifunctional polymer composite with excellent shear stiffening performance and magnetorheological effect. J Mater Chem C 2(34):7133–714010.1039/C4TC00903G ↗
24. Golinelli N, Spaggiari A, Dragoni E (2017) Mechanical behaviour of magnetic silly putty: viscoelastic and magnetorheological properties. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 28(8):953–96010.1177/1045389X15591655 ↗
25. Kim GM, Yang BJ, Cho KJ, Kim EM, Lee HK (2017) Influences of CNT dispersion and pore characteristics on the electrical performance of cementitious composites. Compos Struct 164:32–4210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.049 ↗
26. Liu Z, Pickeb SJ, Besseling NAM (2014) Polyborosiloxanes (PBSs), synthetic kinetics and characterization. Macromolecules 47:4531–453710.1021/ma500632f ↗
27. Gkikas G, Barkoula NM, Paipetis AS (2012) Effect of dispersion conditions on the thermo-mechanical and toughness properties of multi walled carbon nanotubes-reinforced epoxy. Composites B 43(6):2697–270510.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.070 ↗
28. Mittal G, Dhand V, Rhee KY, Park SJ, Lee WR (2015) A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 21:11–2510.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 ↗
29. Houston JE (2005) A local-probe analysis of the rheology of a “solid liquid”. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 43(21):2993–299910.1002/polb.20598 ↗
30. Ma P-C, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J-K (2010) Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos A 41(10):1345–136710.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
31. Tkalya EE, Ghislandi M, de With G, Koning CE (2012) The use of surfactants for dispersing carbon nanotubes and graphene to make conductive nanocomposites. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 17(4):225–23110.1016/j.cocis.2012.03.001 ↗
32. An HN, Sun B, Picken SJ, Mendes E (2012) Long time response of soft magnetorheological gels. J Phys Chem B 116(15):4702–471110.1021/jp301482a ↗