Probabilistic failure criteria for individual microstructural elements: an application to hydrogen-assisted crack initiation in alloy 725
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical failure of polycrystalline metals is often difficult to predict, in part because of the wide range of conditions under which individual elements of the material’s microstructure fail. We describe an efficient method for posing, assessing, and optimizing failure criteria for individual microstructural elements, such as grains, grain boundaries, precipitates, or precipitate–matrix interfaces. Such criteria may lead to improved failure predictions for polycrystalline metals. Our method constructs a failure probability function from a database of individual failure events obtained from experiments on polycrystalline samples. It then uses the Kullback–Leibler (K–L) divergence to compare it to probability densities corresponding to specific hypothesized failure mechanisms. The likeliest failure mechanism is the one that minimizes the K–L divergence with respect to a suitably chosen null hypothesis. As a demonstration, we apply this approach to hydrogen-assisted crack initiation at coherent twin boundaries in Ni-based alloy 725 and deduce a best-fit failure criterion for them.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Seita M, Hanson JP, Gradecak S, Demkowicz MJ (2015) The dual role of coherent twin boundaries in hydrogen embrittlement. Nat Commun 6:6164. doi: 10.1038/ncomms716410.1038/ncomms7164 ↗
2. Hanson JP, Seita M, Jones E, Gradecak S, Demkowicz MJ (2015) Corrosion 2015Nace International. Dallas, Texas
3. Jothi S, Merzlikin SV, Croft TN, Andersson J, Brown SGR (2016) An investigation of micro-mechanisms in hydrogen induced cracking in nickel-based superalloy 718. J Alloy Compd 664:664–681. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.03310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.033 ↗
4. Bridier F, Villechaise P, Mendez J (2008) Slip and fatigue crack formation processes in an alpha/beta titanium alloy in relation to crystallographic texture on different scales. Acta Mater 56:3951–3962. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.03610.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.036 ↗
5. Uta E, Gey N, Bocher P, Humbert M, Gilgert J (2009) Texture heterogeneities in alpha(p)/alpha(s) titanium forging analysed by EBSD-relation to fatigue crack propagation. J Microsc-Oxford 233:451–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03141.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03141.x ↗
6. Simkin BA, Crimp MA, Bieler TR (2003) A factor to predict microcrack nucleation at gamma-gamma grain boundaries in TiAl. Scr Mater 49:149–154. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6462(03)00216-110.1016/S1359-6462(03)00216-1 ↗
7. Kumar D, Bieler TR, Eisenlohr P et al (2008) On predicting nucleation of microcracks due to slip-twin interactions at grain boundaries in duplex Near gamma-TiAl. J Eng Mater Technol 130:02101210.1115/1.2841620 ↗
8. Bieler TR, Eisenlohr P, Roters F et al (2009) The role of heterogeneous deformation on damage nucleation at grain boundaries in single phase metals. Int J Plast 25:1655. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.09.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2008.09.002 ↗
9. Johnson OK, Li L, Demkowicz MJ, Schuh CA (2015) Inferring grain boundary structure-property relations from effective property measurements. J Mater Sci 50:6907. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9241-410.1007/s10853-015-9241-4 ↗
10. Sutton AP, Balluffi RW (1995) Interfaces in crystalline materials. Clarendon Press, Oxford
11. Jun TS, Zhang Z, Sernicola G, Dunne FPE, Britton TB (2016) Local strain rate sensitivity of single alpha phase within a dual-phase Ti alloy. Acta Mater 107:298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.05710.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.057 ↗
12. Imrich PJ, Kirchlechner C, Motz C, Dehm G (2014) Differences in deformation behavior of bicrystalline Cu micropillars containing a twin boundary or a large-angle grain boundary. Acta Mater 73:240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.02210.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.022 ↗
13. Robertson IM (2001) The effect of hydrogen on dislocation dynamics. Eng Fract Mech 68:671–69210.1016/S0013-7944(01)00011-X ↗
14. Legros M (2014) In situ mechanical TEM: seeing and measuring under stress with electrons. CR Phys 15:224–240. doi: 10.1016/j.crhy.2014.02.00210.1016/j.crhy.2014.02.002 ↗
15. LE Shoemaker (2005) Alloys 625 and 725: trends in properties and applications. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Derivatives, Proceedings: 40910.7449/2005/Superalloys_2005_409_418 ↗
16. Watanabe T (1994) The impact of grain-boundary-character-distribution on fracture in polycrystals. Mater Sci Eng A 176:39–4910.1016/0921-5093(94)90957-1 ↗
17. Palumbo G, Aust KT (1995) Solute effects in grain-boundary engineering. Can Metall Quart 34:165. doi: 10.1016/0008-4433(95)00014-O10.1179/cmq.1995.34.3.165 ↗
18. Bechtle S, Kumar M, Somerday BP, Launey ME, Ritchie RO (2009) Grain-boundary engineering markedly reduces susceptibility to intergranular hydrogen embrittlement in metallic materials. Acta Mater 57:4148. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.01210.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.012 ↗
19. Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 22:79. doi: 10.1214/aoms/117772969410.1214/aoms/1177729694 ↗
20. Eguchi S, Copas J (2006) Interpreting Kullback–Leibler divergence with the Neyman–Pearson lemma. J Multivar Anal 97:2034. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2006.03.00710.1016/j.jmva.2006.03.007 ↗
21. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern classification. Wiley, New York
22. Huffman DA (1952) A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes. Proc Inst Radio Eng 40:1098–1101. doi: 10.1109/jrproc.1952.27389810.1109/jrproc.1952.273898 ↗
23. Bachmann F, Hielscher R, Schaeben H (2010) Texture analysis with MTEX—free and open source software toolbox. Sol St Phen 160:63–68. doi:10.4028/ http://www.scientific.net/SSP.160.6310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 ↗
24. Grimmer H, Bollmann W, Warringt Dh (1974) Coincidence-site lattices and complete pattern-shift lattices in cubic-crystals. Acta Crystallogr Sect A 30:197–207. doi: 10.1107/S056773947400043x10.1107/S056773947400043X ↗
25. Saylor DM, Morawiec A, Rohrer GS (2003) Distribution of grain boundaries in magnesia as a function of five macroscopic parameters. Acta Mater 51:3663–3674. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00181-210.1016/S1359-6454(03)00181-2 ↗
26. Saylor DM, El-Dasher BS, Adams BL, Rohrer GS (2004) Measuring the five-parameter grain-boundary distribution from observations of planar sections. Metall Mater Trans A 35A:1981–1989. doi: 10.1007/s11661-004-0147-z10.1007/s11661-004-0147-z ↗
27. Randle V, Davies H (2002) A comparison between three-dimensional and two-dimensional grain boundary plane analysis. Ultramicroscopy 90:153–162. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00137-110.1016/S0304-3991(01)00137-1 ↗
28. Davies H, Randle V (2002) Single-section plane assessment in grain boundary engineered brass. J Microsc-Oxf 205:253–258. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.00989.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.00989.x ↗
29. Rohrer GS (2011) Grain boundary energy anisotropy: a review. J Mater Sci 46:5881–5895. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5677-310.1007/s10853-011-5677-3 ↗
30. Tschopp MA, McDowell DL (2007) Structures and energies of Sigma 3 asymmetric tilt grain boundaries in copper and aluminium. Philos Mag 87:3147–3173. doi: 10.1080/1478643070125589510.1080/14786430701255895 ↗
31. Wang J, Zhang X (2016) Twinning effects on strength and plasticity of metallic materials. MRS Bull 41:274–28110.1557/mrs.2016.67 ↗
32. Jin SB, Zhang K, Bjorge R et al (2015) Formation of incoherent deformation twin boundaries in a coarse-grained Al-7 Mg alloy. Appl Phys Lett 107:091901. doi: 10.1063/1.492968310.1063/1.4929683 ↗
33. Hirth JP, Lothe J (1982) Theory of dislocations. Wiley, New York
34. Osovski S, Srivastava A, Williams JC, Needleman A (2015) Grain boundary crack growth in metastable titanium beta alloys. Acta Mater 82:167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.06210.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.062 ↗
35. Adams BL, Kalidindi S, Fullwood DT (2013) Microstructure-sensitive design for performance optimization. Butterworth–Heinemann, Waltham
36. Fullwood DT, Niezgoda SR, Adams BL, Kalidindi SR (2010) Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Prog Mater Sci 55:477–562. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.08.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.08.002 ↗
37. Seita M, Nimerfroh MM, Demkowicz MJ (2017) Acquisition of partial grain orientation information using optical microscopy. Acta Mater 123:70–8110.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.021 ↗
38. Seita M, Volpi M, Patala S et al (2016) A high-throughput technique for determining grain boundary character non-destructively in microstructures with through-thickness grains. Nat Comput Mater 2:16016
39. Sheather SJ (2009) A modern approach to regression with R. Springer, New York10.1007/978-0-387-09608-7 ↗
40. Di Stefano D, Mrovec M, Elsasser C (2015) First-principles investigation of hydrogen trapping and diffusion at grain boundaries in nickel. Acta Mater 98:306–312. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.03110.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.031 ↗
41. Ritchie RO, Knott JF, Rice JR (1973) Relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild-steel. J Mech Phys Solids 21:395–410. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(73)90008-210.1016/0022-5096(73)90008-2 ↗
42. Chen X, Dejoie C, Jiang T, Ku C-S, Tamura N (2016) Quantitative microstructural imaging by scanning Laue x-ray micro- and nanodiffraction. MRS bull 41:445–45310.1557/mrs.2016.97 ↗