Prediction of enthalpy of formation and Gibbs energy change in pseudo-binary (Ti–Zr)(Fe–Cr)2 and pseudo-ternary (Ti–Zr)(Fe–Cr)2-H system using extended Miedema model
Source abstract
Abstract
The thermodynamic model proposed by Miedema is capable of predicting the enthalpy of formation (ΔH) and relative stability of phases in binary but not in ternary or multi-component systems. While developing nanocrystalline binary/ternary metal hydrides for compressor-driven reversible heating–cooling applications, it is necessary to identify appropriate alloy compositions with suitable hydrogen storage capacity and reversible hydrogen absorption–desorption capability. Accordingly, a suitable modification of the Miedema model is proposed in the present study for calculating ΔH of AB2 type of pseudo-binary (Ti–Zr)(Fe–Cr)2 and pseudo-ternary (Ti–Zr)(Fe–Cr)2-H alloys. Subsequently, Gibbs energy (ΔG) of the possible phases is estimated to predict relative phase stability/equilibrium in a given system. It is shown that grain size or interfacial energy contribution exerts a significant influence on ΔG and relative stability of the phases beyond a critical value/limit. Finally, the predicted phase equilibrium from this model-based calculation is validated by suitable comparison with relevant experimental data reported in the literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Shaltiel D, Jacob I, Davidov D (1977) J Less-Common Met 53:11710.1016/0022-5088(77)90162-X ↗
2. Shaltiel D (1978) J Less-Common Met 62:40710.1016/0022-5088(78)90055-3 ↗
3. de Boer FR, Boom R, Mattens WCM, Miedema AR, Niessen AK (1989) In: de Boer FR, Pettifor DG (eds) Cohesion in Metals, 2nd edn. North Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam
4. Bouten PCP, Meidema AR (1980) J Less-Common Met 71:14710.1016/0022-5088(80)90110-1 ↗
5. van Mal HH, Buschow KHJ, Miedema AR (1974) J Less-Common Met 35:6510.1016/0022-5088(74)90146-5 ↗
6. Miedema AR, Buschow KHJ, van Mal HH (1976) J Less-Common Met 49:46310.1016/0022-5088(76)90057-6 ↗
7. Miedema AR, Buschow KHJ, van Mal HH (1977) In: Proc. symp. on electrode materials and processes for energy conversion and storage, Philadelphia, PA, pp 77–6. The Electrochemical Society, Princeton, p 456
8. Herbst JF (2002) J Alloys Compd 337:9910.1016/S0925-8388(01)01939-9 ↗
9. Herbst JF (2004) J Alloys Compd 368:22110.1016/j.jallcom.2003.08.063 ↗
10. Fang S, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Yao M, Feng F, Northwood DO (2000) Int J Hydrogen Energy 25:14310.1016/S0360-3199(99)00032-4 ↗
11. Fang S, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Yao M, Feng F, Northwood DO (1999) J Alloys Compd 293–295 1010.1016/S0925-8388(99)00380-1 ↗
12. http://hydpark.ca.sandia.gov, as on 20 July 2005
13. Yu GY, Pourarian F, Wallace WE (1985) J Less-Common Met 106:7910.1016/0022-5088(85)90368-6 ↗
14. Lee JY, Park JM (1990) In: Veziroglu TN, Takahashi PK (eds) Hydrogen energy progress VIII. Pergamon Press, New York, 2, pp 985–993
15. Wallace WE, Pourarian F (1985) U.S. Patent 4,556,551, Dec. 3, 1985
16. Park J-G, Jang K-J, Lee PS, Lee J-Y (2001) Int J Hydrogen Energy 26:70110.1016/S0360-3199(01)00006-4 ↗
17. Murr LE (1975) In: Interfacial phenomena in metals and alloys. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company