Modeling the compression-induced morphological behavior of nonwoven materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Nonwovens have the most complex morphologies in textile materials and they are often being compressed in a range of applications. The morphology of a typical nonwoven is defined in terms of fiber orientation, fiber volume fraction, number of fiber-to-fiber contacts, distance between the contacts, porosity, and pore size distribution. In this study, an attempt has been made to predict the morphological characteristics of nonwoven materials under the state of compression. A concept of compression ratio has been introduced in predicting the fiber volume fraction at a defined level of compression strain that has significantly influenced the other morphological characteristics of nonwoven materials. A mechanistic model of pore size distribution of nonwoven has been proposed by updating the structural and morphological parameters under predefined compressive stresses. A comparison has been made between theoretical and experimental pore size distributions of compressed nonwoven fibrous materials. In addition, the out-of-plane fiber orientation distribution was experimentally obtained by analyzing the two-dimensional (2D) cross-sections of fibers in the thickness direction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Material Properties and Processing · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Palmeira EM, Gardoni MG (2002) Geotext Geomembranes 20:9710.1016/S0266-1144(02)00004-3 ↗
2. Englund KR, Wolcott MP, Hermanson JC (2004) Compos Part A 35:27310.1016/j.compositesa.2002.12.001 ↗
3. Li Y, Ma T, Yang ST, Kniss DA (2001) Biomaterials 22:60910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00224-6 ↗
4. Schladitz K, Peters S, Reinel-Bitzer D, Wiegmann A, Ohser J (2006) Comp Mater Sci 38:5610.1016/j.commatsci.2006.01.018 ↗
5. Perna VF, Dixon JS, Zguris GC (1998) Evaluation of pore size deformation in Hovosorb battery separators, battery conference on applications and advances, the thirteenth annual, Long Beach, CA, USA
6. van Wyk CM (1946) J Text Inst 37:T28510.1080/19447024608659279 ↗
7. Komori T, Makashima K (1977) Text Res J 47:1310.1177/004051757704700104 ↗
8. Carnaby GA, Pan N (1989) Text Res J 59:27510.1177/004051758905900505 ↗
9. Rawal A (2009) J Text Inst 100:2810.1080/00405000701592975 ↗
10. Rawal A, Saraswat H (2011) Geotext Geomembranes 29:36310.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.12.006 ↗
11. Pan N, Zhong W (2006) Textile Progress 38:3
12. Jaganathan S, Tafreshi HV, Shim E, Pourdeyhimi B (2009) Colloid Surface A 337:17310.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.12.019 ↗
13. Rawal A (2010) J Text Inst 101:35010.1080/00405000802442351 ↗
14. Rawal A, Kameswara Rao PV, Russell S, Jeganathan A (2010) J Appl Polym Sci 118:266810.1002/app.32608 ↗
15. Rawal A, Agrahari SK (2011) J Mater Sci 46:4487. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5342-x10.1007/s10853-011-5342-x ↗
16. Zhu S, Pelton RH, Collver K (1995) Chem Eng Sci 50:355710.1016/0009-2509(95)00205-J ↗
17. Stearn AE (1971) J Text Inst 62:T353
18. Lee DH, Lee JK (1985) In: Kawabata S, Postle R, Niwa M (eds) Objective measurement: applications to product design and process control. The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, p 613
19. Rawal A, Lomov SV, Ngo T, Verpoest I, Vankerrebrouck J (2007) Text Res J 77:41710.1177/0040517507081313 ↗
20. Pan N, Chen J, Seo M, Backer S (1997) Text Res J 67:90710.1177/004051759706701208 ↗
21. Kang TJ, Lee SH (1999) J Compos Mater 33:211610.1177/002199839903302203 ↗
22. Pan N (1995) Text Res J 65:61810.1177/004051759506501010 ↗