journal article·2009-08

Comparison of Ca/P mineralization on the surfaces of poly (ε-caprolactone) composites filled with silane-modified nano-apatite

Chi Deng, Nin Yao, Xiong Lu, Shuxin Qu, Bo Feng, Jie Weng, Xiaobing Yang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

This study aims to comparatively investigate the Ca/P mineralization on the surfaces of poly (e-caprolactone) (PCL) composites with apatite nano-fillers, which were modified with silane coupling agents. Three kinds of silane coupling agents like 3-Methylacryoxypropyltrimethoxy silane (KH560), γ-Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane (KH570), and N-(β-aminoethyl)-γ-aminopropyltrimethoxy silane (KH792) were firstly employed to modify the surfaces of nano-apatite particles, and then silane-modified nano-apatite/PCL composites were prepared by combining solvent dispersion and melting co-blending with hot-pressing methods. The Ca/P mineralization of the modified PCL-Matrix composites was evaluated by soaking in 2-time simulated body fluid (2SBF) at 36.5 °C and pH 7.40 after 21 days. These results showed that the Ca/P mineralization on the surface of the silane-modified composite was same as not modified composite. Apatite obtained on the surface of the modified composite film was of lower crystallinity, 1.62 Ca/P ratio and carbonate ceramic, similar to inorganic composition of bone in biological body, and not notably different from one of not modified PCL composite. This discussion revealed that as-fabricated silane-modified composite could achieve Ca/P mineralization and exhibited the ability of obtaining like-bone apatite on own surface like other bioactive materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang M (2003) Biomaterials 24:213310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00037-1 ↗
2. Yang R, Takahashi A, Wong CP (2003) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 34:111310.1016/S1359-835X(03)00202-1 ↗
3. Huang J, Yu WL, Xiao WF et al (2007) J Mater Sci Mater Med 18:215110.1007/s10856-007-3201-8 ↗
4. Chen BQ, Sun K (2005) Polym Test 24:97810.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.07.013 ↗
5. Lei Y, Rai B, Ho KH, Teoh SH (2007) Mater Sci Eng C 27:29310.1016/j.msec.2006.05.006 ↗
6. Chen BQ, Sun K (2005) Polym Test 24:6410.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.07.010 ↗
7. Causa F, Netti PA, Ambrosio L et al (2005) J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:672
8. Yu SC, Kithva PH, Rajemdra K, Philip C, Khor KA (2005) Biomaterials 26:234310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.028 ↗
9. Silvio LD, Dalby M, Bonfield W (1998) J Mater Sci Mater Med 9:84510.1023/A:1008900312950 ↗
10. Shor L, Guceri S, Wen XJ et al (2007) Biomaterials 28:529110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.018 ↗
11. Magnaldo AM, Champion R (2007) Chem Eng Sci 62:76610.1016/j.ces.2006.08.076 ↗
12. Wong SC, Baji A (2008) J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:92910.1007/s10856-007-3016-7 ↗