Comparison of Ca/P mineralization on the surfaces of poly (ε-caprolactone) composites filled with silane-modified nano-apatite
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to comparatively investigate the Ca/P mineralization on the surfaces of poly (e-caprolactone) (PCL) composites with apatite nano-fillers, which were modified with silane coupling agents. Three kinds of silane coupling agents like 3-Methylacryoxypropyltrimethoxy silane (KH560), γ-Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane (KH570), and N-(β-aminoethyl)-γ-aminopropyltrimethoxy silane (KH792) were firstly employed to modify the surfaces of nano-apatite particles, and then silane-modified nano-apatite/PCL composites were prepared by combining solvent dispersion and melting co-blending with hot-pressing methods. The Ca/P mineralization of the modified PCL-Matrix composites was evaluated by soaking in 2-time simulated body fluid (2SBF) at 36.5 °C and pH 7.40 after 21 days. These results showed that the Ca/P mineralization on the surface of the silane-modified composite was same as not modified composite. Apatite obtained on the surface of the modified composite film was of lower crystallinity, 1.62 Ca/P ratio and carbonate ceramic, similar to inorganic composition of bone in biological body, and not notably different from one of not modified PCL composite. This discussion revealed that as-fabricated silane-modified composite could achieve Ca/P mineralization and exhibited the ability of obtaining like-bone apatite on own surface like other bioactive materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang M (2003) Biomaterials 24:213310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00037-1 ↗
2. Yang R, Takahashi A, Wong CP (2003) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 34:111310.1016/S1359-835X(03)00202-1 ↗
3. Huang J, Yu WL, Xiao WF et al (2007) J Mater Sci Mater Med 18:215110.1007/s10856-007-3201-8 ↗
4. Chen BQ, Sun K (2005) Polym Test 24:97810.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.07.013 ↗
5. Lei Y, Rai B, Ho KH, Teoh SH (2007) Mater Sci Eng C 27:29310.1016/j.msec.2006.05.006 ↗
6. Chen BQ, Sun K (2005) Polym Test 24:6410.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.07.010 ↗
7. Causa F, Netti PA, Ambrosio L et al (2005) J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:672
8. Yu SC, Kithva PH, Rajemdra K, Philip C, Khor KA (2005) Biomaterials 26:234310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.028 ↗
9. Silvio LD, Dalby M, Bonfield W (1998) J Mater Sci Mater Med 9:84510.1023/A:1008900312950 ↗
10. Shor L, Guceri S, Wen XJ et al (2007) Biomaterials 28:529110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.018 ↗
11. Magnaldo AM, Champion R (2007) Chem Eng Sci 62:76610.1016/j.ces.2006.08.076 ↗
12. Wong SC, Baji A (2008) J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:92910.1007/s10856-007-3016-7 ↗