journal article·2004-01

Interaction between cyclic loading and residual stresses in titanium matrix composites

J. M. Hausmann, C. Leyens, W. A. Kaysser

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Metal matrix composites are gaining popularity for applications where high performance materials are needed. Titanium matrix composites (TMCs) continuously reinforced by silicon carbide fibres are under development for applications in aeroengines. Their use in blades, rings and shafts promises a significant weight reduction and performance improvement due to their high specific strength and stiffness. To obtain the whole capabilities of the material not only advanced processing techniques but also post-processing treatments are necessary. A detailed analysis of the residual stress development during cyclic loading leads to the necessity of residual stress modifications to optimise the fatigue behaviour of TMCs. Since the aerospace industry requires high reliability of the materials used, models for predicting failure and life time are of special interest. Predictive models based on the properties of the single constituents of the composite are most suitable to reduce the number of experiments and to develop methodologies to improve specific mechanical properties. Nevertheless, both experiments on the single constituents as well as on the composite are necessary to validate the model. A previously developed rheological model is used to assess different post-processing procedures to improve the fatigue behaviour of a titanium matrix composite. The usage of the model and experiments on the system SCS-6/Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo are presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Kumpfert, M. Peters, U. Schulz and W. A. Kaysser, in Proceedings of the European Conf. on Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Mechanical Testing, Braunschweig, 1999 (ESA, 1999) p. 315.
2. M. P. Thomas, G. Hopward, R. Pather, M. R. Brown and P. Tranter, Int. J. Fatigue 10 (2001) 851.10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00056-1 ↗
3. C. Leyens, F. Kocian, J. Hausmann and W. A. Kaysser, Aerosp. Sci. Tech. 7(3) (2003) 201.10.1016/S1270-9638(02)00013-5 ↗
4. J. F. Durodola and B. Derby, Acta Met. Mater. 5 (1994) 1525.10.1016/0956-7151(94)90362-X ↗
5. N. P. Rangswamy, M. B. Prime, M. Daymond, M. A. M. Bourke, B. Clausen, H. Chon and N. P. Jayaraman, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2 (1999) 209.10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00893-4 ↗
6. H. Assler, J. Hemptenmacher and K. H. Trautmann, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Low Cycle Fatigue and Elasto-Plastic Behaviour of Materials, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany (1998) p. 461.
7. J. Hemptenmacher, P. W. M. Peters, H. Assler and Z. Xia, in Proceedings of EUROMAT 99 (Munich, 2000) p. 190.
8. P. W. M. Peters, Z. Xia, J. Hemptenmacher and H. Assler, Composites A 3/4 (2001) 561.10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00130-5 ↗
9. N. E. Dowling, “Mechanical Behavior of Materials” (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999) p. 832.
10. J. Hausmann, J. Hemptenmacher and J. Kumpfert, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Composite Materials, edited by Y. Zhang (Beijing, China, June 2001), CD-R.
11. N. Chandra, C. R. Ananth and H. Garmestani, J. Comp. Tech. Res. (1994) 37.
12. J. L. Bobet, C. Masuda and Y. Kagawa, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1997) 6357.10.1023/A:1018665901020 ↗
13. D. S. Li and M. R. Wisnom, J. Comp. Tech. Res. 3 (1994) 225.
14. W. A. Curtin and N. Takeda, J. Comp. Mater. 22 (1998) 2042.10.1177/002199839803202203 ↗
15. H. Assler, “Charakterisierung und Modellierung der mechanischen Eigenschaften von SiC-faserverstärkten Titanmatrix-Verbundwerkstoffen,” PhD-Thesis, RWTH Aachen, 1999, p. 170.
16. T. Nicholas, M. G. Castelli and M. L. Gambone, Scr. Mater. 5 (1997) 585.10.1016/S1359-6462(96)00425-3 ↗
17. T. E. Steyer, F. W. Zok and P. D. Walls, Comp. Sci. Tech. 10 (1998) 1583.10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00218-2 ↗
18. T. Nicholas, “Titanium Matrix Composites—Mechanical Behavior” (Technomic Publ. Co., Lancaster, 1998) p. 209.
19. J. Hausmann, C. Leyens, J. Hemptenmacher and W. A. Kaysser, in Proceedings of TMS Fall Meeting 2001 (Indianapolis, TMS Warendale, 2001) CD-R.
20. S. R. Lampman, Fatigue and Fracture. “ASM Handbook. 19” (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1996) p. 1057.
21. D. Munz, “Ermüdungsverhalten metallischer Werkstoffe,” (DGM, Oberursel, 1985) p. 484.
22. S. Kocanda, “Series of Fatigue and Fracture” (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen, Netherlands, 1978) p. 379.
23. H. Kraus, “Creep Analysis” (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980) p. 280.
24. T. Neeraj, D.-H. Hou, G. S. Daehn and M. J. Mills, Acta Mater. 6 (2000) 1225.10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00426-7 ↗
25. H. J. Frost and M. F. Ashby, “Deformation Mechanism Maps: The Plasticity and Creep of Metals and Ceramics” (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982) p. 166.
26. R. Boyer, G. Welsch and E. W. Collings, “Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys” (ASM International: Materials Park OH, 1994) p. 1169.
27. S. Timoskenko, “Strength of Materials—Part II Advanced Theory and Problems” (Van Nostrand Reinhold Ltd., New York, 1958) p. 572.
28. S. G. Warrier, P. Rangaswamy, M. A. M. Bourke and S. Krishnamurthy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2 (1999) 220.10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00894-6 ↗
29. D. B. Gundel and D. B. Miracle, Comp. Sci. Tech. 10 (1998) 1571.10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00217-0 ↗
30. J. Hausmann, C. Leyens, J. Hemptenmacher and W. A. Kaysser, Adv. Eng. Mater. 7 (2002) 497.10.1002/1527-2648(20020717)4:7<497::AID-ADEM497>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
31. H. J. Dudek and R. Leucht, “Advanced Aerospace Materials” (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1992) p. 124.