Magnetostrictive properties of epoxy resins modified with Terfenol-D particles for detection of internal stress in CFRP. Part 2: evaluation of stress detection
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical performance of carbon fibre reinforced polymers is predominantly limited by internal stress induced by resin shrinkage of the polymer matrix. Terfenol-D particles are investigated as internal sensors to detect the stress situation on a non-destructive way. Part 1 of the article describes the preparation and characterization of the samples used in the investigation of the sensory effect (Kubicka et al. J Mater Sci 47:5752–5759, 2012). Part 2 presents the results of the evaluation of the stress detection. A fundamental discussion is given how these magnetostrictive particles act as stress sensors in epoxy resins using the Villari effect. Analysing this effect in terms of particle content, particle size and particle distribution the most promising parameters are identified. Obviously the higher the particle content (20 wt%) and the smaller the particle size (<20 μm) combined with a strong homogeneous particle distribution the higher the magnetic flux density changes, in case of tensile loads. These corresponding stress situations are quantified by a Hall probe. Interestingly, the magnetic flux density changes (∆B) can be significantly increased by a pre-magnetization step of the samples, allowing a more sensitive detection of the Villari effect.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Rudd CD, Long AC, Kendall KN, Mangin CGE (1998) Liquid moulding technologies. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge
2. Kruckenberg TK, Paton R (eds) (1998) Resin transfer moulding for aerospace structures. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht
3. Mei W, Okane T, Umeda T (1998) J Appl Phys 84:620810.1063/1.368938 ↗
4. McKnight GP (2002) Oriented Terfenol-D composites. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
5. Anjanappa M, Wu Y (1997) Smart Mater Struct 6:39310.1088/0964-1726/6/4/002 ↗
6. Krishna Murty AV, Anjanappa M, Wu Y-F (1997) J Sound Vib 206(2):13310.1006/jsvi.1997.0997 ↗
7. Krishnamurthy AV, Anjanappa M, Wang Z, Chen X (1999) J Intell Mater Syst Struct 10:82510.1106/6UR5-7LE3-QV3H-AG6V ↗
8. Saidha E, Naik GN, Gopalkrishnan S (2003) Struct Health Monit 2:27310.1177/147592103039918 ↗
9. Duenas TA, Carman GP (2001) J Appl Phys 90:243310.1063/1.1389518 ↗
10. Dong X, Guan X, Ou J (2009) Effects of particle size on magnetostrictive properties of magnetostrictive composites with low particulate volume fraction. In: SPIE 7289, Nr. 728920, 1
11. Villari E (1865) Ann Phys Chem 126:8710.1002/andp.18652020906 ↗
12. Lee EW (1955) Rep Prog Phys 18:18410.1088/0034-4885/18/1/305 ↗
13. Jiles DC (1995) J Phys D 28:153710.1088/0022-3727/28/8/001 ↗
14. Kubicka M, Mahrholz T, Kühn A, Wierach P, Sinapius M (2012) J Mater Sci 47:5752. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6466-310.1007/s10853-012-6466-3 ↗
15. Newnham RE (1986) Ferroelectrics 1:110.1080/00150198608238734 ↗