journal article·2021-10Open access

Comparative study on the influence of surface characteristics on de-icing evaluation

Halar Memon, Kiana Mirshahidi, Kamran Alasvand Zarasvand, Kevin Golovin, Davide S. A. De Focatiis, Kwing-So Choi, Xianghui Hou

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 30

Abstract

Abstract A comparative study of de-icing evaluation methods was conducted in this work, and their variations in response to surface characteristics were investigated. The mechanical de-icing measurements include centrifugal, push, and tensile methods. The centrifugal and the horizontal push (shear) methods suggested a linear relationship of ice adhesion strength with surface roughness, whereas the tensile (normal) method indicated an inverse curvilinear relationship with contact angle hysteresis. A partial correlation of contact angle hysteresis on the shear-based methods was also indicated over a specified range of surface roughness. Further attempts were also made on 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyltriethoxysilane-coated surfaces, and the ice adhesion indicated a clear reduction in the normal de-icing method, whereas the shear-based methods did not show a considerable change in ice adhesion, highlighting their mechanical forces-centric response. Lastly, a further evaluation using a hybrid de-icing method was conducted, to verify the influence of surface characteristics on ice removal involving heating, which demonstrated a partial correlation of energy consumption with the ice adhesion strength over a specified range of surface roughness. The results obtained in this study provide crucial information on the influence of surface characteristics on ice adhesion and offer material-dependent correlations of the popular de-icing evaluation methods. The conclusions could be applied to define an appropriate testing method for the evaluation of icephobic surfaces and coatings. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Icing and De-icing Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Work A, Lian Y (2018) A critical review of the measurement of ice adhesion to solid substrates. Prog Aerosp Sci 98:1–2610.1016/j.paerosci.2018.03.001 ↗
2. Rønneberg S, Zhuo Y, Laforte C, He J, Zhang Z (2019) Interlaboratory study of ice adhesion using different techniques. Coatings 9:67810.3390/coatings9100678 ↗
3. Wang F, Ding W, He J, Zhang Z (2019) Phase transition enabled durable anti-icing surfaces and its DIY design. Chem Eng J 360:243–24910.1016/j.cej.2018.11.224 ↗
4. Vazirinasab E, Maghsoudi K, Jafari R, Momen G (2020) A comparative study of the icephobic and self-cleaning properties of Teflon materials having different surface morphologies. J Mater Process Technol 276:11641510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116415 ↗
5. Wang F, Xiao S, Zhuo Y, Ding W, He J, Zhang Z (2019) Liquid layer generators for excellent icephobicity at extremely low temperatures. Mater Horiz 6:2063–207210.1039/C9MH00859D ↗
6. Zhu L, Xue J, Wang Y, Chen Q, Ding J, Wang Q (2013) Ice-phobic coatings based on silicon-oil-infused polydimethylsiloxane. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:4053–406210.1021/am400704z ↗
7. Bharathidasan T, Kumar SV, Bobji MS, Chakradhar RPS, Basu BJ (2014) Effect of wettability and surface roughness on ice-adhesion strength of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 314:241–25010.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.101 ↗
8. A.H. Work Jr, A.L. Gyekenyesi, R.E. Kreeger, J.A. Salem, M.M. Vargas, D.R. Drabiak, The adhesion strength of impact ice measured using a modified lap joint test, in: Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, Atlanta, GA, USA, (2018) 25–28
9. Soltis J, Palacios J, Eden T, Wolfe D (2015) Evaluation of ice-adhesion strength on erosion-resistant materials. AIAA J 53:1825–183510.2514/1.J053516 ↗
10. Palacios J, Wolfe D, Bailey M, Szefi J (2015) Ice testing of a centrifugally powered pneumatic deicing system for helicopter rotor blades. J Am Helicopter Soc 60:1–1210.4050/JAHS.60.032014 ↗
11. Janjua ZA, Turnbull B, Choy K-L, Pandis C, Liu J, Hou X, Choi K-S (2017) Performance and durability tests of smart icephobic coatings to reduce ice adhesion. Appl Surf Sci 407:555–56410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.206 ↗
12. Tetteh E, Loth E (2020) Reducing static and impact ice adhesion with a self-lubricating icephobic coating (SLIC). Coatings 10:26210.3390/coatings10030262 ↗
13. Zhuo Y, Xiao S, Håkonsen V, Li T, Wang F, He J, Zhang Z (2020) Ultrafast self-healing and highly transparent coating with mechanically durable icephobicity. Appl Mater Today 19:10054210.1016/j.apmt.2019.100542 ↗
14. Li X, Wang G, Moita AS, Zhang C, Wang S, Liu Y (2020) Fabrication of bio-inspired non-fluorinated superhydrophobic surfaces with anti-icing property and its wettability transformation analysis. Appl Surf Sci 505:14438610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144386 ↗
15. Rønneberg S, He J, Zhang Z (2020) The need for standards in low ice adhesion surface research: a critical review. J Adhes Sci Technol 34:319–34710.1080/01694243.2019.1679523 ↗
16. M.R. Kasaai, M. Farzaneh, A Critical Review of Evaluation Methods of Ice Adhesion Strength on the Surface of Materials, in: ASME 2004 23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 3. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, (2004) 919–92610.1115/OMAE2004-51264 ↗
17. M. Schulz, M. Sinapius, Evaluation of Different Ice Adhesion Tests for Mechanical Deicing Systems, SAE Tech. Pap. 2015–01–2135, Warrendale, PA, USA (2015)10.4271/2015-01-2135 ↗
18. Maghsoudi K, Vazirinasab E, Momen G, Jafari R (2021) Icephobicity and durability assessment of superhydrophobic surfaces: the role of surface roughness and the ice adhesion measurement technique. J Mater Process Technol 288:11688310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116883 ↗
19. A. Laroche, M.J. Grasso, A. Dolatabadi, E. Bonaccurso, Tensile and Shear Test Methods for Quantifying the Ice Adhesion Strength to a Surface, In: Ice Adhesion: Mechanism, Measurement and Mitigation (eds K. Mittal and C.-H. Choi), (2020) 237-28410.1002/9781119640523.ch9 ↗
20. Memon H, Liu J, De Focatiis DSA, Choi K-S, Hou X (2020) Intrinsic dependence of ice adhesion strength on surface roughness. Surf Coat Technol 385:12538210.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125382 ↗
21. Memon H, Liu J, Weston N, Wang J, De Focatiis DSA, Choi K-S, Hou X (2019) In-situ icing and water condensation study on different topographical surfaces. Cold Reg Sci Technol 165:10281410.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102814 ↗
22. Liu J, Wang J, Memon H, Fu Y, Barman T, Choi K-S, Hou X (2019) Hydrophobic/icephobic coatings based on thermal sprayed metallic layers with subsequent surface functionalization. Surf Coat Technol 357:267–27210.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.002 ↗
23. Memon H, De Focatiis DSA, Choi K-S, Hou X (2021) Durability enhancement of low ice adhesion polymeric coatings. Prog Org Coat 151:10603310.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.106033 ↗
24. Liu J, Wang J, Mazzola L, Memon H, Barman T, Turnbull B, Mingione G, Choi K-S, Hou X (2018) Development and evaluation of poly (dimethylsiloxane) based composite coatings for icephobic applications. Surf Coat Technol 349:980–98510.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.06.066 ↗
25. Wang J, Memon H, Liu J, Yang G, Xu F, Hussain T, Scotchford C, Hou X (2019) Effect of surface adsorption on icing behaviour of metallic coating. Surf Coat Technol 380:12506810.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125068 ↗
26. Tas M, Memon H, Xu F, Ahmed I, Hou X (2020) Electrospun nanofibre membrane based transparent slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces with icephobic properties. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 585:12417710.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124177 ↗
27. Golovin K, Kobaku SPR, Lee DH, DiLoreto ET, Mabry JM, Tuteja A (2016) Designing durable icephobic surfaces. Sci Adv 2:e150149610.1126/sciadv.1501496 ↗
28. Mirshahidi K, Zarasvand KA, Luo W, Golovin K (2020) A high throughput tensile ice adhesion measurement system. HardwareX 8:e0014610.1016/j.ohx.2020.e00146 ↗
29. Zheng Y, Wang J, Liu J, Choi K-S, Hou X (2019) Energy saving strategy for the development of icephobic coatings and surfaces. Thin Solid Films 687:13745810.1016/j.tsf.2019.137458 ↗
30. D.T. Bishoy, C. Giuffre, A. Bastawros (2018) Fracture Mechanics Based Approach for Ice Adhesion Characterization, in: 2018 Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA 334310.2514/6.2018-3343 ↗
31. Susoff M, Siegmann K, Pfaffenroth C, Hirayama M (2013) Evaluation of icephobic coatings—screening of different coatings and influence of roughness. Appl Surf Sci 282:870–87910.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.073 ↗
32. Zou M, Beckford S, Wei R, Ellis C, Hatton G, Miller MA (2011) Effects of surface roughness and energy on ice adhesion strength. Appl Surf Sci 257:3786–379210.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.149 ↗
33. He Y, Jiang C, Cao X, Chen J, Tian W, Yuan W (2014) Reducing ice adhesion by hierarchical micro-nano-pillars. Appl Surf Sci 305:589–59510.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.139 ↗
34. Rønneberg S, Xiao S, He J, Zhang Z (2020) Nanoscale correlations of ice adhesion strength and water contact angle. Coatings 10:37910.3390/coatings10040379 ↗
35. Davis A, Yeong YH, Steele A, Bayer IS, Loth E (2014) Superhydrophobic nanocomposite surface topography and ice adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:9272–927910.1021/am501640h ↗
36. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2006) Contact angle hysteresis explained. Langmuir 22:6234–623710.1021/la060254j ↗
37. Mittal KL (1977) The role of the interface in adhesion phenomena. Polym Eng Sci 17:467–47310.1002/pen.760170709 ↗
38. Kulinich SA, Farzaneh M (2009) How wetting hysteresis influences ice adhesion strength on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 25:8854–885610.1021/la901439c ↗
39. Gold LW (1970) Process of failure in ice. Can Geotech J 7:405–41310.1139/t70-052 ↗
40. Javan-Mashmool M, Volat C, Farzaneh M (2006) A new method for measuring ice adhesion strength at an ice–substrate interface. Hydrol Process 20:645–65510.1002/hyp.6110 ↗
41. Somlo B, Gupta V (2001) A hydrophobic self-assembled monolayer with improved adhesion to aluminum for deicing application. Mech Mater 33:471–48010.1016/S0167-6636(01)00068-0 ↗
42. H. Koivuluoto, C. Stenroos, R. Ruohomaa, G. Bolelli, L. Lusvarghi, P. Vuoristo, Research on icing behavior and ice adhesion testing of icephobic surfaces, In: Proceedings of 16th International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures-IWAIS XVI, June, (2015) 6
43. Chen J, Luo Z, Fan Q, Lv J, Wang J (2014) Anti-ice coating inspired by ice skating. Small 10:4693–469910.1002/smll.201401557 ↗
44. Goertz MP, Zhu X-Y, Houston JE (2009) Exploring the liquid-like layer on the ice surface. Langmuir 25:6905–690810.1021/la9001994 ↗
45. Jiang G, Chen L, Zhang S, Huang H (2018) Superhydrophobic SiC/CNTs coatings with photothermal deicing and passive anti-icing properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:36505–3651110.1021/acsami.8b11201 ↗
46. Wang F, Tay TE, Sun Y, Liang W, Yang B (2019) Low-voltage and -surface energy SWCNT/poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) nanocomposite film: Surface wettability for passive anti-icing and surface-skin heating for active deicing. Compos Sci Technol 184:10787210.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107872 ↗
47. Schaaf J, Kauffeld M (2018) Ice aluminum debonding with induction heating. J Adhes Sci Technol 32:2111–212710.1080/01694243.2018.1463671 ↗
48. Zhang Y, Chen L, Liu H (2020) Study on ice adhesion of composite anti-/deicing component under heating condition. Adv Compos Lett 29:1–1010.1177/2633366X20912440 ↗